Neodeightonia C. Booth, 1970
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.627.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10249873 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0397879F-FC06-2931-FF64-9AA9FE3AFCBB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neodeightonia C. Booth |
status |
|
Neodeightonia C. Booth View in CoL View at ENA , in Punithalingam, Mycological Papers 119: 17 (1970), MycoBank MB3450
Neodeightonia View in CoL was introduced by Booth based on N. subglobosa View in CoL on dead culms of Bambusa arundinacea View in CoL from Sierra Leone ( Punithalingam 1969). von Arx & Müller (1975) transferred N. subglobosa View in CoL to Botryosphaeria View in CoL and consequently reduced Neodeightonia View in CoL to synonymy under Botryosphaeria View in CoL . However, based on morpho-molecular data, Phillips et al. (2008) reinstated Neodeightonia View in CoL as a separate lineage in Botryosphaeriaceae View in CoL distinct from Botryosphaeria View in CoL . Neodeightonia species are characterized by hyaline, aseptate ascospores with bipolar germ pores, surrounded by a membrane that swells in water acquiring a wing-like appearance, and hyaline, aseptate conidia that may become pigmented, 1-septate and smooth to finely roughened or striate ( Liu et al. 2012, Phillips et al. 2013, 2019) ( Table 4 View TABLE 4 ). They are typically associated with monocotyledonous plants and are mostly restricted to palms ( Arecaceae View in CoL ) and bamboos ( Poaceae View in CoL ) ( Punithalingam 1969, Phillips et al. 2008, Liu et al. 2012, Adamčík et al. 2015, Dai et al. 2017), being primarily reported as saprobes, although a few have been reported as pathogens causing leaf spots and leaf, rachis and root rot ( Ligoxigakis et al. 2013, Bengyella et al. 2015, Nishad & Ahmed 2020, Shabong & Kayang 2022, Zhang & Song 2022). Given the synonymies proposed and the species introduced herein, nine species known from culture are included in Neodeightonia View in CoL based on morphological and phylogenetic analyses, namely N. chamaeropicola sp. nov., N. licuriensis ( Adamčík et al. 2015) View in CoL , N. microspora ( Dai et al. 2017) View in CoL , N. palmicola ( Liu et al. 2010) View in CoL , N. phoenicum ( Phillips et al. 2008) View in CoL , N. rattanica View in CoL , N. rattanicola ( Konta et al. 2016a) View in CoL , N. septata ( Wu et al. 2022) View in CoL and N. subglobosa ( Phillips et al. 2008) View in CoL . Of these, seven have been reported from palms ( N. chamaeropicola , N. licuriensis View in CoL , N. palmicola View in CoL , N. phoenicum View in CoL , N. rattanica View in CoL , N. rattanicola View in CoL and N. septata View in CoL ), while the remaining two have been reported from bamboos ( N. microspora View in CoL and N. subglobosa View in CoL ). Recently Botryosphaeria mucosa was transferred to Neodeightonia View in CoL by Zhang et al. (2021b) based on morphological analysis, but since no molecular data are available for this species its status cannot be confirmed.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Neodeightonia C. Booth
Pereira, Diana S. & Phillips, Alan J. L. 2023 |
Neodeightonia
Punithalingam 1970: 17 |