Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) bracatus, Gustafsson & Zou, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5284.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DED5B7B1-123A-483D-93B0-803D0D1D05EF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7929338 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687AE-FFAA-FFD0-FF4D-FAFBFED2FC9F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) bracatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) bracatus new species
( Figs 17–23 View FIGURES 17–18 View FIGURES 19–23 , 40 View FIGURES 40–44 )
Type host. Arborophila atrogularis (Blyth, 1849) —white-cheeked partridge.
Type locality. Myanmar .
Diagnosis. Reticulipeurus (Forcipurellus) bracatus is most similar to R. (F.) formosanus , with which it shares the following characters: frons broadly rounded ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 3–8 , 19 View FIGURES 19–23 ); male scape not modified except length and width compared from female ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 3–8 , 19–20 View FIGURES 19–23 ); ventral sclerite of mesosome of similar shape ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 3–8 , 22 View FIGURES 19–23 ); male stylus short, spatulate and distal margin of male abdomen shallowly concave ( Figs 40, 42 View FIGURES 40–44 ). However, these two species can be separated by the following characters: male flagellomere I expanded distally in R. (F.) formosanus ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–8 ), but not in R. (F.) bracatus ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19–23 ); male mesosome proportionately larger and with coarser rugosity in R. (F.) formosanus ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3–8 ) than in R. (F.) bracatus ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19–23 ); lateral ends of ventral sclerite of male mesosome of different shape ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 3–8 , 22 View FIGURES 19–23 ); basal apodeme proportionately longer in R. (F.) bracatus ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19–23 ) than in R. (F.) formosanus (Fig, 5); lateral lobes of female vulval margin generally with more vms in R. (F.) bracatus (19–22; Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19–23 ) than in R. (F.) formosanus (15–20; Fig. 8 View FIGURES 3–8 ), but there is some overlap between species in this character, and females may be best separated by the shape of the lateral lobes and claspers ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 3–8 , 23 View FIGURES 19–23 ), as well as by head shape ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–2 , 18 View FIGURES 17–18 ).
Description. Preantennal head broadly rounded ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19–23 ). Male scape longer than female ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19–23 ), slightly wider but otherwise not modified; male flagellomere I without distal extension. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19–23 . Lateral margins of temples rounded in male. Thoracic and abdominal segments and chaetotaxy as in Figs 17–18 View FIGURES 17–18 . Holotype male with pterothoracic chaetotaxy aberrant: left side with only 2 mms macrosetae on posterior margin, but right side with 4 mms macrosetae; we have here illustrated 4 setae; as these are broken in holotype, they are here illustrated tentatively based on comparisons with other species in the group. Paratype female with abdominal segment III aberrant on one side: much reduced in length, distal margin displaced proximally in lateral section, and spiracle opening absent. Female leg II broken off at femur on both sides, and not illustrated. Distal abdomen of male as in Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40–44 ; sternal plate VII apparently separate from to subgenital plate; stylus short, spatulate; distal margin of segment XI distinctly concave, lateral corners not extended distally. Male genitalia as in Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 19–23 . Distal rugosity of mesosome fine, limited to near margin. Ventral sclerite with flat anterior margin and two visible gpmes on each side. Gonopore approaches distal margin of mesosome. Parameres broken in single examined male, and not illustrated. Female sternal plate VII without median bulge on distal margin ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19–23 ). Median bulge of vulval margin moderate, with 3–5 vss on each side; lateral lobes with 19–22 long, slender vms on each side. Lateral margin of claspers with 7–8 lateral setae on each side. Measurements as in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .
Type material examined. Holotype 1♁, Burma [= Myanmar], no date, coll. R. Meinertzhagen , 13341, NHMUK010682695 About NHMUK ( NHML) . Paratype 1♀, same data as holotype ( NHML) .
Etymology. The species epithet is derived from “ bracatus ”, Latin for “wearing trousers”. This refers to the reticulation patterns of femurs II and III, which can be clearly seen in this species, more than in the other species treated here.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
NHML |
Natural History Museum, Tripoli |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |