Haemaphysalis aponommoides Warburton, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5251.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3326BF76-A2FB-4244-BA4C-D0AF81F55637 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7728770 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03966A56-0F26-C726-BABF-8F29B492FA0D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Haemaphysalis aponommoides Warburton, 1913 |
status |
|
8. Haemaphysalis aponommoides Warburton, 1913 View in CoL View at ENA .
Oriental: 1) China (south), 2) India, 3) Nepal (south and central); Palearctic: 1) China (north), 2) Nepal (north and central) ( Hoogstraal & Mitchell 1971, Kolonin 2009, Chen et al. 2010, Pun et al. 2018).
Phan Trong (1977) included Vietnam within the range of Haemaphysalis aponommoides , but this is not supported by other workers. Geevarghese & Mishra (2011) included Iran, Taiwan and Japan within the geographic range of Haemaphysalis aponommoides , based on Hoogstraal (1962a). The presence of this tick in Iran is supported by a female specimen listed in Delpy (1938), but Hosseini-Chegeni et al. (2019) excluded Haemaphysalis aponommoides from the Iranian tick fauna, while Robbins (2005) explained that supposed Taiwanese Haemaphysalis aponommoides were in fact Haemaphysalis kitaokai . Yamaguti et al. (1971) also noted that the alleged occurrence of Haemaphysais aponommoides in Japan (under the name Haemaphysalis inermis aponommoides ) is not based on bona fide specimens. Therefore, Vietnam, Iran, Taiwan and Japan are not included within the geographic distribution of Haemaphysalis aponommoides .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |