Rhipicephalus camicasi Morel, Mouchet & Rodhain, 1976
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5251.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3326BF76-A2FB-4244-BA4C-D0AF81F55637 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7718343 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03966A56-0F19-C718-BABF-8DAEB6CEFF19 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhipicephalus camicasi Morel, Mouchet & Rodhain, 1976 |
status |
|
13. Rhipicephalus camicasi Morel, Mouchet & Rodhain, 1976 View in CoL View at ENA .
Afrotropical: 1) Djibouti, 2) Ethiopia, 3) Kenya, 4) Oman, 5) Saudi Arabia (south), 6) Somalia, 7) Sudan, 8) Yemen; Palearctic: 1) Egypt, 2) Jordan, 3) Lebanon, 4) Saudi Arabia (north) ( Morel 1980, Pegram et al. 1987c, 1989, Saliba et al. 1990, Wassef et al. 1997, Walker et al. 2000, ElGhali & Hassan 2012, Harrison et al. 2015, Estrada-Peña et al. 2017, Springer et al. 2020, Olivieri et al. 2021, Perveen et al. 2021).
Morel (1980) stressed the difficulties involved in morphologically separating Rhipicephalus camicasi from Rhipicephalus bergeoni , Rhipicephalus guilhoni and Rhipicephalus sulcatus , while Chitimia-Dobler et al. (2017b) suggested that Rhipicephalus camicasi is a synonym of Rhipicephalus guilhoni . Chandra et al. (2022) emphasized the need for a revision of Rhipicephalus camicasi because more than one species may be included under this name; consequently, the range of this tick should be considered provisional.
The supposed presence of Rhipicephalus camicasi in Zambia ( Kobayashi et al. 2021) requires confirmation, and that country is provisionally excluded from the range of this tick.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |