Panthera pardus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2017n2a8 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36D6C5E9-8632-41E2-88F0-D470B3DEA72C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03961919-FD04-FFB1-FF76-0BEDD49E29AA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Panthera pardus ( Linnaeus, 1758 ) |
status |
|
cf. Panthera pardus ( Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL
(Leopard)
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Craniodental. CD 701, left Ci; CD 16744, I2; CD 9602, I3; CD 6210, I3; CD 3691, posterior portion of cranium ( Table 1). Postcranial: CD 6672 + CD 6673, refitting fragments of a right distal femoral epiphysis; CD 2053, left distal femoral epiphysis; CD 5996, humerus, proximal diaphysis only.
DIAGNOSIS AND DISCUSSION
These specimens are all leopard-sized. CD 701 is the enamel cap of a lower canine, there is no dentine infill and the crown is completely unworn, indicating it was unerupted. The crown is unkeeled (so it is not Dinofelis ) and has one lingual groove near the tip, but it is small in comparison with modern leopards. CD 16744 is a small and heavily worn left I2 with pyrolusite encrustation. CD 6210 is a broken and worn right I3 with pyrolusite encrustation. The crown is strongly curved with a clear internal cingulum. CD 9602 is a large left I3 with a possible accessory cusp. It is slightly narrower medio-laterally than a modern leopard (AZ 420) and also lacks the internal cingulum. CD 3691 is the posterior portion of a cranium, with both auditory bullae, both occipital condyles, and a small portion of the sagittal crest. CD 6672 and CD 6673 are refitting fragments of a right distal femoral epiphysis. They are the same size and morphology as CD 2053, a left distal femoral epiphysis, suggesting that they may be antimeres. They are good, but not exact, matches for Panthera pardus , however there were no distal Megantereon femora available to compare them with. CD 5996 is a humeral diaphysis in three pieces, it is entirely unfused and is a good match for a male leopard of similar age (AZ 420), however the medial ridge appears much more pronounced in the modern specimen.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.