Montina distincta ( Stål, 1859 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2022.019 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10552723 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039387AD-1360-FFBC-FC0A-B0F34148DD41 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Montina distincta ( Stål, 1859 ) |
status |
|
Montina distincta ( Stål, 1859) View in CoL
( Figs 9 View Fig ; 10 View Fig ; 24D View Fig ; 26D View Fig ; 28D View Fig ; 30 View Fig ; 40 View Fig )
Ploeogaster distinctus Stål, 1859: 198 (new species).
Ploeogaster distinctus: WALKER (1873) : 93 (checklist).
Aristippus distinctus: STÂL (1868) : 99 (key, new generic placement).
Montina (Aristippus) distincta: STÂL (1872) View in CoL : 74 (checklist, new generic placement, Aristippus as subgenus).
Montina distincta: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1896) View in CoL : 195 (catalog); MALDONADO (1990): 234 (catalog).
Type locality. Brazil, Pará.
Type material. LECTOTYPE (here designated): [ BRAZIL – PARA]: 1 ♂, (GREEN LABEL) “PARA” / “ distinctus Stål ” / 2566 / (red label) Typus / Lectotype Ploeogaster distinctus Stål, 1859 Desig. by A. Mejía-Soto & D. Forero ( ZMHB). PARALECTOTYPES: BRAZIL: 1 ♀, (green label) “Brazil. Coll. Germ. ” / “distinctus ♀ Stål” / 8227 / (red label) “Allo-” Typus (ZMHB). PARA: 1 ♀, (green label) “Pará Sieber” / “2564” / “* Ploeogaster testaceus ” (sic) ♀ Paratypus Stål” (red label) Paratypus ( ZMHB) . [UNKNOWN]: 1 ♂, “distinctus !! Stål” / M. Berl / (red label) Paratypus / (red label) 380 “82” / NHRS-GULI 000000606 ( NHRS); 1♂, “* Ploeogaster distinctus Paratypus Stal” / (red label) Paratypus ( ZMHB).
Other specimens examined. COLOMBIA: AMAZONAS: 1 ♂, Leticia, comunidad indígena Monifue Amena, Km 9,8 vía Leticia-Tarapacá; [04.1416°S 69.9232°W]; 70 m; 2 Oct 2009; M. Cubillos, M. Gamba leg.; MPUJ _ENT0058490 ( MPUJ). CAQUETǠ: 1 ♀, Florencia; 22 Ene 1969; I. Zenner leg.; CTNI No. 2541 ( CTNI). CUNDINAMARCA: 1 ♀, La Vega, vereda El Volcán; 1600 m; 28 Mar 2002; N. Ulba leg.; vegetación baja; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB); 1♀, Cáqueza; 4°24′30″N, 73°56′50″W; 1740 m; 10 Sep 1994; W. Valero leg.; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB). META: 1 ♂, La Macarena; 2°10′54.185″N, 73°47′11.22″W; 28 Mar 1997; C. Santana leg.; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB); 1 ♀, Puerto López; 2 Nov; L.E. Aguirre leg.; ICN 029913 ( ICN); 1 ♀, Puerto López; 85 m; Oct 194?; F. Gallego leg.; MEFLG 7277 ( MEFLG); 1 ♂, Puerto López, Cafam; 9 Sep 1991; C. Jímenez leg.; MPUJ _ENT0058529 ( MPUJ); 1 ♀, Puerto López, Remolinos; 300 m; 19 Mar 1993; [colecta] manual; MPUJ _ENT0058509 ( MPUJ); 1 ♀, Puerto López, Remolinos, Centro Cafam Llanos, ~ 55km W Puerto Gaitán; 04.2751°N 72.5408°W; 165 m; A. Guillen leg.; MPUJ _ENT0058527 ( MPUJ); 1 ♀, Remolinos; 300 m; 20 Mar 1993; J. Gary leg.; MPUJ _ENT0058515 ( MPUJ); 1 ♀, Remolinos; 390 m; 19 Mar 1993; MPUJ _ENT0058509 ( MPUJ); 1 adult, sex not determined; San Juan de Arama, PNN [Parque Nacional Naural] La Macarena, vereda Monserrate; Nov 1989; ICN 027664 ( ICN); 1 ♀, San Juan de Arama; 3°22′, 73°52′W; 450 m; 24 Mar 1997; S. Henríquez leg.; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, San Martín, Finca [el] Caduceo, cerca al río Camoa; 400 m; 14 May 2006; C. Sánchez leg.; jama [insect net] ( ICN); 1 ♀, San Martín, vereda Puerto Castro, Finca Hato; 11 Dic 2001; J. Ramírez leg.; MPUJ _ENT0058580 ( MPUJ); 1 ♂, San Martín; 3°42′N, 73°42′W; 419 m; 17 Ene 1997; O. Fuentes leg.; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB); 2 ♀♀, Villavicencio; 4°09′N, 73°39′W; 467 m; 12 Nov 1992; R. Marisol leg.; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB); 1♀, same data; 13 Oct 1994; D. Aponte leg.; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB); 1 ♀, Villavicencio, Km 20 Vía Puerto López, Hacienda San Antonio; 1 Dic 2003; M.Turgeman leg.; MPUJ _ENT0058601 ( MPUJ); 1 ♂, same data; 15 Nov 2003; A. Robayo leg.; MPUJ _ENT0058528 ( MPUJ). VICHADA: 1♀, Puerto Carreño,Finca La Morena; 6°12′N, 67°23′W; 90 m; 26 Sep 1998; J. Herrera,M.Martínez leg.; UNAB No. 4861 ( UNAB).
Diagnosis. Total length, female 20.5–21.8 mm (n = 4), male 14.3–14.6 mm (n = 4). General coloration light brown ( Figs 9B, D View Fig ), sometimes pronotum dark brown ( Fig. 31B View Fig ); membrane translucent yellow; reduced anterolateral pronotal angles ( Figs 9B, D View Fig ); discal tubercle of the anterior pronotal lobe conical and small in males ( Fig. 9F View Fig ), thick, subconical, directed anteriad in females ( Fig. 9E View Fig ); apex of corium usually red ( Fig. 9B View Fig ); margin of connexivum almost straight, never lobed ( Figs 9A, C View Fig ); females with ventral laterotergites with a dorsal, broad, pale yellow band contrasting with the black ventral area ( Fig. 9C View Fig ), males similar but usually with the black band reaching the dorsal margin on segments 4–5 ( Fig. 9A View Fig ).
Variation. Two characters are sexually dimorphic in M. distincta , the coloration and structure of the connexivum. The dark band on the ventral laterotergites in females usually covers the lower half of segments 2–6 and part of 7 ( Fig. 9C View Fig ), whereas in males this dark band resembles a semicircle that covers most of segments 4 and 5 but only a small part of segments 3 and 6 ( Figs 9A View Fig ). The posterior margin of each of the connexival segment has a blunt process, these are more conspicuous in segments 2–6 in males, whereas in females they are more conspicuous in segments 2–5.
Differential diagnosis. Montina distincta is similar in coloration to M. fumosa and M. tikuna sp. nov. but can be easily distinguished by having a shorter total length and by the contrasting black band on the ventral laterotergites ( Figs 9A, C View Fig ), whereas in M. tikuna sp. nov. the ventral laterotergites are uniformly black ( Fig. 23A View Fig ) and in M. fumosa the ventral laterotergites are uniformly dark brown, both without a conspicuous contrasting pattern ( Figs 11A, C View Fig ).
Distribution. Brazil, French Guiana ( MALDONADO 1990; STÂL 1859, 1868), and Colombia (Amazonas, Caquetá, Cundinamarca, Meta, and Vichada), with records between 90–1500 m ( Fig. 40 View Fig ).
Remark on types. When describing M. distincta, STÂL (1859) indicated that he had examined a male from “Mus. Berol.” (ZMHB). We found several specimens that we consider syntypes in both ZMHB and NHRS. We have designated a male in good condition from ZMHB as the lectotype which bears a “Para” label ( Fig. 31 View Fig ). We have selected this male because it is from the ZMHB collection, agreeing with the original description ( STÂL 1859), and has a label that although not directly indicating Brazil, it fits Stål’s note of “Brasilia?” because Pará is a large Brazilian state in Amazon region. The lectotype differs from most of the examined specimens on the dorsal extension of the dark marking on the ventral laterotergites. In the lectotype the dark marking extends only slightly dorsally on segments 4 and 5, whereas in most examined males the dark marking reaches the dorsal margin of the ventral laterotergites. Similarly, one female paralectotype has the black marking completely covering the ventral laterotergites on segments 2, 3 and part of 4. This suggests that the dark marking is variable in its extension on the ventral laterotergites, but the presence of a dark marking strongly contrasting with a dorsal pale area is common to all examined specimens, and thus, of specific value. We are considering one of the paralectotype specimens to belong here although it bears an identification label of “ Ploeogaster testaceus ”. As discussed below under M. testacea , that specimen was likely mislabeled for curatorial purposes, and because it fits all the diagnostic characters of M. distincta , we are considering it as a paralectotype of this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Montina distincta ( Stål, 1859 )
Mejía-Soto, Andrés, Forero, Dimitri & Wolff, Marta 2022 |
Montina distincta:
LETHIERRY L. F. & SEVERIN G. 1896: 195 |
Ploeogaster distinctus:
WALKER F. 1873: 93 |
Montina (Aristippus) distincta: STÂL (1872)
STAL C. 1872: 74 |
Aristippus distinctus: STÂL (1868)
STAL C. 1868: 99 |
Ploeogaster distinctus Stål, 1859: 198
STAL C. 1859: 198 |