Scirtothrips casuarinae Palmer & Mound
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157021 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D03EBF36-25FC-4294-A36B-4614392064B3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6276637 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0391C840-FFE6-9976-8347-FECCFE19CE21 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scirtothrips casuarinae Palmer & Mound |
status |
|
Scirtothrips casuarinae Palmer & Mound View in CoL
[ Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 10 ]
Scirtothrips casuarinae Palmer & Mound, 1983: 512 View in CoL 513.
In common with S. solus View in CoL , the only other species in this genus with seven instead of eight antennal segments, S. casuarinae View in CoL appears to be associated with the foliage of young Casuarina View in CoL plants [ Casuarinaceae View in CoL ]. Although taken at several sites in eastern New South Wales and Queensland, the species has been collected rarely. As in S. solus View in CoL , the tergal median discal setae are further apart than in many Australian Scirtothrips View in CoL species, and the metanotum has weak equiangular reticulation with the median setae well behind the anterior margin. The forewing posteromarginal cilia are mainly straight in this species, but two or more cilia near the base of the wing are weakly undulating. The male bears a pair of long dorsallycurving drepanae on the ninth tergite, but the aedeagus does not bear any spines or stout setae.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Scirtothrips casuarinae Palmer & Mound
Hoddle, Mark S. & Mound, Laurence A. 2003 |
Scirtothrips casuarinae
Palmer 1983: 512 |