Anthalona, Van Damme, Sinev & Dumont, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2875.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0390471D-FFD4-181D-FF22-D12068A4CFD2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anthalona |
status |
incertae sedis |
Synonyms and Anthalona incertae sedis
Together with Alona verrucosa , we move a few taxa from Alona to Anthalona gen. n. We cannot decide on the identity behind these names because of poor original descriptions and the absence of type material. A denticle on We reproduce the original drawings of these taxa in Figure 25 View FIGURE 25 , compared to drawings of Anthalona verrucosa ( Sars, 1901) , of which paralectotypes exist ( Figs 22D–L View FIGURE 22 ). Comments on these species included in Alona checklist in Van Damme et al. (2010).
1. Alona alonopsiformis Brehm, 1933 = Anthalona alonopsiformis ( Brehm, 1933) comb. nov. ( Figs 25E–F View FIGURE 25 ). Type locality: “Dagiangan, Indo-Malaysia”, this is likely Mindanao Island, South-Philippines. No type material exists. A. alonopsiformis is too briefly described by Brehm to allow identification with Anthalona species described here. But, Brehm (1933) shows a postabdomen with all characters of Anthalona . Dumont et al. (1984) considered this animal correctly as member of the A. verrucosa- complex, but transferred the name to Africa. A. alonopsiformis is unlikely to occur on latter continent, replaced by A. harti n. sp. We do not want to dismiss Brehm’s name until material from the Philippines can be investigated. Without it, decisions on synonymy cannot be made. It is uncertain if the species described herein, from Borneo ( Anthalona obtusa n. sp.), is identical, but latter may differ mainly in having a blunt denticle on the labral keel.
2. Alona verrucosa lineolata Chen & Li, 1991 = Anthalona lineolata (Chen & Li, 1991) comb.nov. ( Figs 25G– J View FIGURE 25 ) =? Alona mediterranea ( Yalim, 2005) . Type locality: reservoir in Dongshan Village, Huarong County, Hunan Province; collected by Yi Zhong in August 12, 1989 ( Chen et al. 1991). Type material deposited in the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China (Holotype: parthenogenetic female, Paratypes: two parthenogenetic females) ( Chen, Zhang, Yi & Guo, 1991). Identity uncertain, type material could not be examined. Definitely a member of Anthalona and certainly NOT A. verrucosa ( Sars, 1901) . A. lineolata has: 1) fine striation on the carapace ( Fig. 25G View FIGURE 25 ); 2) elongate body shape with high posterior corner ( Fig. 25G View FIGURE 25 ); and 3) round posterior margin and relatively long denticles on the postabdomen ( Fig. 25H View FIGURE 25 ). These are all typical characters of Anthalona mediterranea . There is a strong possibility that Anthalona mediterranea ( Yalim, 2005) , redescribed herein, may be identical to A. lineolata ( Chen et al., 1991) . Until re-study of the Chinese taxon, we cannot make a decision on its identity. There may be also differences with A. mediterranea . According to Chen et al. (1991), Anthalona lineolata has a denticle on the labral keel ( Fig. 25J View FIGURE 25 ), lateral pores are very close to the main head pores ( Fig. 25I View FIGURE 25 ) and one seta is presumably (needs to be checked) absent in the second antenna (according to description; antennal formula exo/endo 003/013), present in A. mediterranea . If both are identical, the nomenclatural situation should be examined.
3. Biapertura pseudoverrucosa pseudoverrucosa Smirnov, 1971 = Alona rectangula Sars, 1861 sensu Daday , pseudoverrucosa pseudoverrucosa Smirnov, 1971 as opposed to Biapertura pseudoverrucosa verrucosa . Daday’s (1905) figures of A. rectangula show a clear Anthalona and the author notes several differences with A. verrucosa . No type material exists (see Forró & Frey, 1982 for Daday’s Cladocera collection). The figures of Daday (1905) are not realistic; his drawing style contains over-enthusiastic curves and characters may be exaggerated, others ignored. However, the name by Smirnov (1971) was not correct, as the older name verrucosa cannot be a subspecies of the younger pseudoverrucosa , and both do not belong in Biapertura (= A. affinis group). Also the major character of distinction, presence or absence of the tubercles ( Smirnov, 1971), is invalid as we observed this variable in the same stock of A. verrucosa verrucosa (see Figs 27A–B View FIGURE 27 ). We regard Biapertura pseudoverrucosa Smirnov, 1971 here as a junior synonym of Alona verrucosa Sars, 1901 .
Two others names in the lump genus Alona Baird, 1843 , cannot be assigned unambiguously to Anthalona gen. n. These taxa may be better grouped as incertae sedis under Coronatella . First is Alona anodonta Daday, 1905 from Paraguay. Tuberculate valves, lacks a proximal denticle in the labral keel ( Daday, 1905). In the same publication and from the same samples, Daday (1905) lists Alona verrucosa and Alona rectangula (see above under Anthalona pseudoverrucosa ( Smirnov 1971)) , now respectively Anthalona verrucosa and Coronatella rectangula . Alona anodonta Daday, 1905 has the general body shape and postabdomen of these genera. Tubercles may appear in both. In a later publication, Daday considers his own species, A. anodonta , synonym of A. rectangula (Daday 1910) . We think that A. anodonta may be a Coronatella indeed. Details and status unknown, types absent. Smirnov (1971) lists A. anodonta as tuberculate form of Alona pseudoanodonta Brehm, 1933 , but both have very different origins. Rajapaksa & Fernando (1982) depict an Alona cf. anodonta from Sri Lanka. From their figures, this is clearly a Coronatella species. It shows the amount of confusion in these smaller Aloninae ... The second, Alona pseudoanodonta Brehm, 1933 , may be also be a member of Coronatella . Description and drawings in Brehm (1933) do not allow a decision on its identity.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.