Belonuchus cifuentesi Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5152.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:92E9DD85-6CC6-4602-BD7C-C51F49CEEF47 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6630871 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E8789-7769-7F44-81AF-A36FFCB2FE49 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Belonuchus cifuentesi Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia, 2016 |
status |
|
Belonuchus cifuentesi Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia, 2016 View in CoL
Figs. 7a View FIGURE 7 , 20a View FIGURE 20 , 24e View FIGURE 24 , 32a View FIGURE 32
Belonuchus cifuentesi Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia, 2016: 445 View in CoL View Cited Treatment .
This species has been recently described by Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia (2016); therefore, a redescription is not necessary. We only include some taxonomic comments and some illustrations of diagnostic structures.
Taxonomic comments. This species can be confused with B. dichrous and B. flavipennis . The means of separation from B. dichrous is mentioned in the taxonomic comments of that species. Belonuchus cifuentesi is distinguished from B. flavipennis by having the legs and first two visible abdominal segments reddish as elytra, male genital sternite very elongate (3.28 times longer than wide), aedeagus large (3.1 mm), oval-elongate shape, with apex subacute ( Fig. 24e View FIGURE 24 ). While B. flavipennis has legs and all abdomen black, except anterior border of sixth visible segment, male genital sternite short (2.21 times longer than wide), small aedeagus (1.13 mm), with elongate shape, convex apex, slightly acute in ventral view and moderately acute in lateral view ( Fig. 24g View FIGURE 24 ). Belonuchus cifuentesi also can be confused with B. arizonicus . According with Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia (2016: 450), “ B. cifuentesi is recognized by the black abdominal segments from tergite V, the pleurites VI and VIII are black in more than half of specimens, antennomeres pubescent, tempora less than twice as long as the length of the eyes, the first 4 antennomeres are longer than width, anterior corners and pronotal hypomera reddish-brown, frons with wide fovea and with a longitudinal impression, dorsal surface with scattered umbilicate punctures, first three antennomeres bearing only sparse strong setae, outer antennomeres (4–11) with microtrichia and long setae, profemur with two lines of spines of irregular size, metafemur with two lines of small and strong spines; tibiae with several spines; tarsi filiform, first and fifth tarsomeres longer than each one of the second to fourth, aedeagus small, narrow and elongate, median lobe subparallel-sided to slightly, evenly narrowed toward obtuse apex and smaller than B. arizonicus ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 )”.
Type material examined (two males): Paratypes: “ México: Jalisco, Teocuitatlán de Corona, Cerro de García , colecta manual en Agave inaequidens, 2-VII al 3-VIII de 2014, 20°09´N, 103°19´W, 2314 msnm, col. William D. Rodríguez / Paratype Belonuchus cifuentesi Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia (2015) ” (m 1, CEZUG). Same data as previous, except: “3-VIII al 3-IX de 2014” (m 1, CEZUG) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Belonuchus cifuentesi Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia, 2016
Márquez, Juan & Asiain, Julieta 2022 |
Belonuchus cifuentesi Rodríguez & Navarrete-Heredia, 2016: 445
Rodriguez, W. D. & Navarrete-Heredia, J. L. 2016: 445 |