Calotes Cuvier, 1817
The genus
Calotes Cuvier, 1817
with the type species
Lacerta calotes Linnaeus, 1758
belongs to the subfamily
Draconinae
of the family
Agamidae
, containing 26 species. The geographical distribution of this genus is largely restricted to South Asia and Indo-china, except for one isolated species
Calotes nigriplicatus Hallermann, 2000
found in Ambon Island in Indonesia. The greatest diversity of the genus is in the Western Ghats and Sri Lanka. Four species of
Calotes
(
C. grandisquamis
,
C. nemoricola
,
Calotes cf. versicolor
,
Calotes calotes
) are known from the Western Ghats of which two are endemic to this region.
Diagnosis. Medium to large sized agamids with a relatively broader head; dorsal and lateral scales uniform, arranged in rows of backwardly pointed scales; dorsal and nuchal crest more or less developed; groups or rows of spines from eye to above tympanum; often an antehumeral skin fold or pit present covered with small scales; gular sac usually present; tympanum naked; tail long and slender, usually swollen and rounded at the base in males; no preanal or femoral pores.
Distribution. Lizards belonging to the Genus
Calotes
are widely distributed across Iran, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Nepal, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka as well as southern China; parts of Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Peninsular Malaysia and parts of Indonesia. Moreover,
Calotes versicolor
has been introduced into Kenya, Borneo, Sulawesi, Seychelles, Mauritius, Oman and Florida ( USA) (Das et al. 2008; Manthey, 2008; Uetz and Hošek, 2016).
Taxonomic groups. Smith (1935) separated members of the genus
Calotes
into four distinct groups, I.
C. cristatella
group, II.
C. microlepis
group, III.
C. versicolor
group, and IV.
C. liocephalus
group, each composed of multiple species and another group composed of two dwarf species based on their morphological similarities. Later, Moody (1980) separated the genus into four different genera, namely
Bronchocela Kaup, 1827
(group I of Smith),
Dendragama Doria, 1888
,
Pseudocalotes Fitzinger, 1843
(group II of Smith) and
Calotes
(group III, IV and the two dwarf species of Smith). Most of the
Calotes
species occurring in the Western Ghats belong to the
Calotes versicolor
group of Smith (1935) except
Calotes rouxii
and
Calotes ellioti
, which belong to the dwarf group. Here, we transfer these two species to the new genus
Monilesaurus
gen. nov. In the present study, we follow Smith’s species groups for taxonomic accounts and morphological comparisons. Since Smith, there have been various new additions to the genus
Calotes
and to the
Calotes versicolor
group. In this study, we compare each individual species only with members of their own group.
Calotes versicolor
group. Members of the
C. versicolor
group are characterized by a medium to large adult body size; body more or less compressed, dorsal and lateral scales large, uniform, smooth or feebly keeled and oriented postero-dorsally; antehumeral fold absent; dorsal scales larger than the ventrals except in
C. calotes
where it is equal to or slightly smaller than the ventrals; nuchal and dorsal crest well developed, continuous, at least till behind the shoulders; postorbital spine absent except in
C. emma Gray, 1845
; supratympanic spines in form of paired patches or as a single longitudinal series of spines ( Fig. 4
View FIGURE 4
& 5
View FIGURE 5
). For taxonomic comparisons, we add the recently designated
C. minor
to Smith’s
C. versicolor
group (See Deepak et al. 2015).
Content.
Calotes bachae Hartmann, Geissler, Poyarkov, Ihlow, Galoyan, Rödder & Böhme, 2013
;
C. bhutanensis Biswas, 1975
;
C. calotes
;
C. ceylonensis Müller, 1887
;
C. chincollium Vindum, 2003
;
C. desilvai Bahir & Maduwage, 2005
;
C. emma
;
C. grandisquamis
,
C. hutunwini Zug & Vindum, 2006
;
C. irawadi Zug, Grown, Schulte & Vindum, 2006
;
C. jerdoni Günther, 1870
;
C. liocephalus Günther, 1872
;
C. liolepis Boulenger, 1885
;
C. versicolor
,
C. manamendrai Amarasinghe & Karunarathna, 2014
;
C. maria Gray, 1845
;
C. medgoensis Zhao & Li, 1984
;
C. minor
,
C. mystaceus Duméril & Bibron, 1837
;
C. nemoricola
,
C. nigrilabris Peters, 1860
;
C. nigriplicatus Hallermann, 2000
and
C. pethiyagodai Amarasinghe, Karunarathna, Hallermann, Fujinuma, Grillitsch & Campbell, 2014
.
Diagnosis. All the species belonging to this group can be differentiated from the other groups of
Calotes
based on the combination of the following characters: From members of the genus
Monilesaurus
gen.nov., they can be easily distinguished morphologically based on a larger adult size (vs. smaller); dorsal and lateral scales rows directed posterodorsally, much larger in size (vs. posteroventrally, smaller in size); dorsal and lateral scales larger than ventrals, except in
C. calotes
(vs. not larger than ventrals) ( Fig. 4–5
View FIGURE 4
View FIGURE 5
vs 6–7) and absence of antehumeral fold (vs. presence of a well developed antehumeral fold) ( Fig. 10
View FIGURE 10
). From members of the genus
Psammophilus
, group they can be distinguished by the presence of compressed body shape (vs. depressed) ( Fig. 4–5
View FIGURE 4
View FIGURE 5
vs 8a); absence of an antehumeral fold (vs. antehumeral fold present) ( Fig. 10f
View FIGURE 10
vs 10g); lateral scales much larger (vs. smaller); presence of well developed nuchal crest (vs. reduced) and lesser number of midbody scale rows, less than 60 (vs. scale rows higher in number, more than 80). From
Microauris
gen. nov. by having a relatively large tympanum ( Fig. 9a
View FIGURE 9
vs 9b); scales on head large uniform shield like (vs. small, sub-triangular) ( Fig. 10b
View FIGURE 10
vs 10d).