Austrodecus, Hodgson, 1907
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4567.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0AEFAF80-B001-4A18-88AC-5B6A189F6DCD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5944896 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03895C33-2904-4F11-FF01-FC8BFB6DF9D3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Austrodecus |
status |
|
Austrodecus View in CoL sp. C
Figure 12 View FIGURE 12 A–D; Plate 4 View PLATE 4 B–D
Material examined. Male, Southwest Indian Ocean, Middle of What Seamount, 37 ° 57.42´S, 50° 26.34´E, ROV, 1148 m, specimen JC066-2743, coral rubble and sediment, 1 December 2011.
Description. Male holotype. Trunk segmented ( Fig. 12A, B View FIGURE 12 ), segments 1 to 4 with finger-like dorsomedian tubercles ( Plate 4B View PLATE 4 ), height at least as tall as the depth of trunk, margins of tubercles uneven, otherwise without spines or processes; lateral processes smooth, separated by less than their own basal width; diverging distally ( Plate 4C View PLATE 4 ). Ocular tubercle tall, height almost equal to half length of trunk, inclined forward, over-reaching proboscis base, tapering from broad base to narrow truncate apical surface; four eyes, unpigmented, evidenced by four white areas ( Plate 4D View PLATE 4 ).
Proboscis typical of genus, down-curved, annulated distally, basal part inflated, smooth; jaws vertically bilateral.
Abdomen unarticulated at base, length about 25% of trunk length, carried horizontally, tapering slightly distally.
Chelifores absent.
Palp five-segmented, attached to lateral extension of cephalon, segment 1 longest, segment 3 next longest, less than half length segment 1.
Oviger probably four-segmented, details of segments unclear, distal-most segment appears to be longest.
Third leg ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ) bearing short, scattered setae, femur longest segment, with long dorsodistal hair-like spine on low process, tibia 2 longer than tibia 1, tibiae with single long dorsodistal hair-like spine, distal spine on tibia 2 placed short distance back from distal margin, first coxae of all legs with prominent dorsodistal digitiform tubercles in the order of 1:2:2:1, each tubercle much shorter than corresponding trunk median tubercle, coxa 2 longer than coxae 1 or 3, third coxa with single, short, dorsal digitiform process, propodus gently curved, long, about threequarters length tibia 2, heel absent, sole lined with 7 to10 short spines, terminal claw about one-quarter length of propodus. Single, conical femoral cement gland duct on mid-ventral surface of legs 3 and 4 only ( Fig.12C View FIGURE 12 ), height little more than corresponding width of femur. Auxiliary claws possibly absent. Gonopores not observed.
Remarks. Unfortunately the solitary specimen was lost before observations were fully documented and before photography was completed. This specimen is undoubtedly new to science and considering the importance of extending our knowledge of the biodiversity of this remote collection area I have described the species to a level where it can be readily identified. In as much as the palps and ovigers are not known in sufficient detail, the description is incomplete and accordingly the species is not named. The specimen was not measured but the relative proportions of segments are evident in the images taken. The femora of legs 1 and 2 are more slender and longer than those on legs 3 & 4 ( Figs 12C, D View FIGURE 12 ).
This species shares the arrangement of dorsodistal digitiform tubercles on the first and third coxa, the position of a femoral ventral cement gland cone on legs 3 & 4, five-segmented palps and probably four-segmented ovigers with Austrodecus taylorae . The auxiliary claws could be tiny rather than absent. Differences are most evident in the taller and more-slender mid-dorsal tubercles which are at least as tall as the depth of the trunk, the much taller cement gland cones, the proportions of tibia 1 and 2, and the absence of prominent auxiliary claws.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |