Chrysogorgia flexilis ( Wright & Studer, 1889 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7641011 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B7D-FFC0-FF56-F962FF0EFE46 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chrysogorgia flexilis ( Wright & Studer, 1889 ) |
status |
|
Chrysogorgia flexilis ( Wright & Studer, 1889) View in CoL
Dasygorgia flexilis Wright & Studer, 1889 View in CoL : pl. 4, fig. 2a, b; pl. 5, fig. 2; pl. 5a, fig. 10 ( Chile).
Chrysogorgia flexilis Verslyus 1902: 43–47 View in CoL , figs. 49–63 (Makassar Strait).
Opinion: This species may occur in the region.
Justification: This Indian record could be valid: Thomson & Henderson, 1906: 28–29, pl. 2, fig. 3 ( Laccadive Sea).
Literature analysis: The original description of this species by Wright & Studer (1889) is totally inadequate but that by Versluys is good enough to be able to recognise this species (Untiedt, pers. comm.) so it is possible that Thomson & Henderson (1906) could have correctly identified their material. Rao & Devi (2003) just listed the species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Calcaxonia |
Family |
|
Genus |
Chrysogorgia flexilis ( Wright & Studer, 1889 )
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Chrysogorgia flexilis
Verslyus, J. 1902: 47 |