Caridina propinqua De Man, 1908
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5333541 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0386A025-6950-5E38-A7A1-FCFAC6ACD09B |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Caridina propinqua De Man, 1908 |
status |
|
Caridina propinqua De Man, 1908 View in CoL
( Figs. 4–6 View Fig View Fig View Fig )
Caridina propinqua De Man, 1908 a: 227 View in CoL , Pl. 19, Fig. 6 View Fig [type locality: Dhappa, near Calcutta, India]; Kemp, 1915: 309; 1918: 274; Bouvier, 1925: 181, Figs. 375, 381; Johnson, 1961:131, Figs. 12–15 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig ; 1965: 8; De Silva, 1982: 127, Fig.5 View Fig ; Ng & Choy, 1990: 17; Wowor et al., 2004: 343, Fig. 7J–L View Fig ; Cai & Shokita, 2006a: 249; 200b: 2150.
Caridina blanco Chace, 1997:7 View in CoL , Fig. 2 View Fig [type locality: Tayabus River , Luzon Island, the Philippines].
Caridina hainanensis Liang &Yan, 1983: 211 View in CoL , Fig. 1 View Fig [type locality: Wenchang County, Hainan Island , China]; Liang, 2004: 302.
Material examined. – Peninsular Malaysia: 9 males, cl 2.5–3.0 mm , 2 females, cl 2.3–3.0 mm, 2 ovigerous females, cl 3.6–4.0 mm, ZRC.1979.4.17.28–40, Malaysia: Johor Bahru, non-brackish stream, low tide, flowing into Sungai Skudai at mile 2, Skudai Rd , coll. E. R. Alfred, 9 Feb.1957 ; 3 males, cl 2.8–3.0 mm, 2 females, cl 3.1 mm, 3 ovigerous females, cl 3.3–3.5 mm, ZRC 2007.0374 View Materials , mangrove creek at Tanjong Sedili , Johor, Malaysia, coll. Y. Cai & N. K. Ng, 20 Sep.1999 . Singapore: 22 males, cl 2.3–3.1 mm , 18 females, cl 2.7–3.4 mm, 11 ovigerous females, cl 3.1–3.8 mm, ZRC 2007.0375 View Materials , creek in Sungei Buloh mangroves, Singapore, coll. Y. Cai, 18 Nov.1999 ; 7 males, cl 2.0–3.0 mm, 12 females, cl 2.6–3.6 mm, 8 ovigerous females, cl 2.9–3.4 mm, ZRC 2007.0376 View Materials , Mandai Kechil mangroves, Singapore , coll. REST lab, 8 Apr.1992 ; 1 male, cl 2.8 mm, 2 females, 2.6–3.0 mm, 1 ovigerous female, cl 3.4 mm, ZRC.1979.4.17.14–19, Singapore: Mile 12, Jurong Road, peaty ditches, through coconut plantation, coll. D. S. Johnson, 16 Jan.1957 ; 1 male, cl 2.5 mm, 1 female, cl 4.0 mm, 1 juv., ZRC 2007.0377 View Materials , Singapore: Sungai Buloh , coll. P. K. L. Ng, 23 Apr.1991 ; 5 males, cl 2.0– 2.5 mm, 6 females, cl 2.2–3.3 mm, ZRC 2007.0378 View Materials , Singapore: Sungai Buloh ; coll. P. Ng, Dec.1992 ; 2 males, cl 2.5–2.6 mm, 1 female, cl 4.2 mm, 1 ovigerous female, cl 4.0 mm, ZRC 1990.11823 View Materials – 11826 View Materials , Singapore : Sungai Seletar, coll. P. Yeoh, 23 Sep.1995 .
Diagnosis. – Rostrum ( Fig. 4A, B View Fig , 5A View Fig , 6A View Fig ) straight or sloping down anteriorly, reaching near middle of second segment of antennular peduncle, to end of third segment. Rostral formula: 2–4+8–16/0–4 (mostly 3), no apical teeth. Suborbital angle acute, distinctly separated from antennal spines; pterygostomian margin rounded. Preanal carina ( Figs. 4D View Fig , 5B View Fig ) with a spine. Sixth abdominal somite 0.8 times as long as carapace, 1.9 times as long as fifth somite. Telson ( Fig. 4C View Fig ) with 3 or 4 pairs of dorsal spines and small posteromedial projection, lateral pair of spines longer than intermedial pairs. Antennular peduncle long, subequal to carapace length. Stylocerite reaching to 0.8 times length of basal segment of antennular peduncle. Scaphocerite ( Figs. 4E View Fig , 5C View Fig , 6B View Fig ) 3.5–4.0 times as long as wide. First pereiopod ( Figs. 4F View Fig , 5E View Fig , 6I View Fig ) with carpus 2.1–3.3 times as long as high, chela 2.5 times as long as broad, finger longer than palm. Second pereiopod ( Figs. 4G View Fig , 5D View Fig , 6J View Fig ) with carpus 6.3–9.6 times as long as high, chela 3.4–5.0 times as long as broad, fingers twice as long as palm. Third pereiopod ( Figs. 4H, I View Fig , 5F, G View Fig , 6K View Fig ) with propodus 3.3–3.8 times as long as dactylus, propodus not enlarged. Dactylus ending in 2 claws, with 2–5 spines on flexor margin. Fifth pereiopod ( Figs. 4J, K View Fig , 5H, I View Fig , 6L View Fig ) with propodus 2.8–3.1 times as long as dactylus; dactylus ending in a claw, with 66–74 spinules on flexor margin. Endopod of male first pleopod ( Fig. 6M View Fig ) with no appendix interna. Uropodal diaeresis ( Figs. 4L View Fig , 5J View Fig ) with 13–15 spinules. Eggs sized 0.32–0.36 × 0.20–0.22 mm.
Remarks. – Cai & Shokita (2006b) recently reviewed the taxonomy of this species and regarded C. hainanensis Liang & Yan, 1983 and C. blancoi Chace, 1997 as its junior synonyms.
The forms of the first two pereiopods vary with both location and sex. In the female specimens from Sungei Buloh, Singapore, the carpus of the first and the second pereiopods are 2.2 and 6.3 times as long as high, respectively, those of the female specimens from Sungei Mandai, Singapore, are 2.9 and 7.4 times, respectively, while those of male from Sungai Sedili, Malaysia are 3.4 times and 9.6 times, respectively. The eggs that we measured are also relatively smaller than what has been reported (0.32–0.36 × 0.20–0.22 mm in current study vs. 0.39–0.45 × 0.24–0.27 mm in Hainan (Liang & Yan, 1983) and 0.38–0.48 × 0.25–0.30 mm in the Ryukyu Islands (Cai & Shokita, 2006a)). Johnson (1961) reported the egg size of the present species as 0.54 × 0.36 mm from Malaysia. However, as pointed out in the remarks section under C. johnsoni , new species, Johnson’s (1961) material is probably a mixture of C. propinqua and C. johnsoni (see below).
Distribution. – Sri Lanka, India, Malay Peninsula, the Philippines, Japan and China (present study; Cai & Shokita, 2006b).
ZRC |
Zoological Reference Collection, National University of Singapore |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Caridina propinqua De Man, 1908
Cai, Yixiong, Ng, Peter K. L. & Choy, Satish 2007 |
Caridina hainanensis Liang &Yan, 1983: 211
Liang, X 2004: 302 |