Promitobates difficilis (Mello-Leitão, 1931), Mello-Leitao, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.280969 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6174028 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038687A2-FFFE-C25A-FF3C-59F2FE7FF83E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Promitobates difficilis (Mello-Leitão, 1931) |
status |
|
Promitobates difficilis (Mello-Leitão, 1931) View in CoL
( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 B, 7B, 9B, 11B, 13B, 15A, 16D–F)
Batomites difficilis Mello-Leitão, 1931b: 141 View in CoL , fig. 11; 1935a: 109 (cit.); [ BRAZIL, Santa Catarina; 3 lectotype, 8 Ƥ paralectoptypes, here designated, MNRJ 11395, examined].
Promitobates difficilis: B. Soares, 1945b: 368 View in CoL (cat.); Soares & Soares, 1949b: 237 (cat.); Kury 2003: 151 (cat.; syst.).
Diagnosis. Three areas on dorsal scutum; area III with a pair of apophyses tapered on apex. It can be distinguished from the other species by the dorsal scutum with tiger-like stripes and by the sulphurous yellow tubercles on dorsal scutum.
Male redescription. Measurements (n=8). Dorsal scutum maximum width 3.9–4.5 (4.3); dorsal scutum total length 3.9–4.7 (4.6); prosoma length: 1.4–1.9 (1.7); length of external apophysis of coxa IV 0.8–1.6 (1.5); femur IV length 15.5–34.3 (34.1). Tarsal formula: 7; 13–16; 8–9 (8); 8.
Dorsum ( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 B, 7B). Anterior margin of prosoma with frontal hump with scattered small tubercles and one or two tubercles at corners. Ocularium with a pair of spiniform apophyses (apex rounded) divergent and directed anteriorly. Prosoma with tubercles behind ocularium and arranged in “V”. Area I with two median transverse rows of tubercles and small tubercles up to the posterior groove. Area II with transverse rows of tubercles up to the posterior groove. Area III with a pair of high spiniform apophyses tapered on apex, scattered tubercles on median region, and a row of tubercles up to the posterior groove. Lateral margin of dorsal scutum with a row of tubercles that is placed from ocularium to area II and 2–4 enlarged tubercles. Posterior margin of dorsal scutum with a row of tubercles increasing in size to the corners and two spiniform paramedian apophyses. Free tergites with small tubercles at corners. Anal operculum unarmed.
Chelicera. Segment I with two small tubercles; II unarmed.
Pedipalp. Trochanter with granulated dorsal hump and one small ventral spine. Femur with a small ventral basal spine and an enlarged prolateral subapical spine. Tibial setation: mesal IiIi; ectal IiIi/IIi. Tarsus setation: mesal IIi; ectal IiIi/IIi.
Venter. Coxa I with median row of five setiferous tubercles, four apical tubercles; trochanter I with one median tubercle. Coxa II with a median row of eight small tubercles and two apical tubercles; trochanter II with one median tubercle. Coxa III with small tubercles, roughly distributed in rows, the anterior one and the posterior one with tubercles increasing in size distally; trochanter III with median tubercle. Coxa IV with scattered tubercles and one row of tubercles on posterior margin; genital area unarmed; free sternites with one row of small granules; anal operculum unarmed.
Legs ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 B). Coxa I with one posterior dorso-basal apophysis; coxa II with one anterior dorso-basal apophysis and one posterior; coxa III with an anterior dorso-basal apophysis; coxa IV densely tuberculated, with one small internal apophysis and one external apical bifid apophysis. Trochanters I–III with small scattered tubercles; IV with a dorsal subapical apophysis, an external basal apophysis, and a small internal pointed tubercle. Femur IV more than 10 times longer than dorsal scutum, straight, with minute tubercles.
Coloration ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A). Dorsal scutum with black tiger-like stripes; sulphurous yellow tubercles on prosoma, dorsal scutum and posterior margin; black apophyses on area III and apex of coxa IV.
Penis ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 D–F). Sides of ventral plate convex, slightly curved apically, and corner of anterior margin rounded and directed ventrally; three pairs of distal setae, median smallest; three pairs of basal setae arranged in “V” and one pair of small ventral basal setae. Stylus unarmed, apex straight and swollen. Ventral process shorter than stylus, with spoon-shaped apex with serrate margins slightly directed ventrally.
Female redescription. ( Figs. 11 View FIGURE 11 B, 13B). Measurements (n=4). dorsal scutum maximum width 3.9–4.6 (4.3); dorsal scutum total length 4.1–4.8 (4.5); prosoma length 1.3–2.0 (1.8). Femur IV: 11.2–15.5 (14.8). Tarsal formula: 7; 13–15; 8; 8. Body more convex than male. Apophyses of area III larger than that on male and slightly directed posteriorly. Posterior margin of dorsal scutum with one pair of median pointed apophysis; free tergites unarmed. Coxa IV with reduced external apical spiniform apophysis, internal apophysis absent. Trochanter IV with an internal spiniform tubercle; femur IV shorter than male.
Geographical distribution. Northern Atlantic Rain Forest of Santa Catarina to southeastern Paraná States ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A).
Other material examined. BRAZIL. Santa Catarina: Joinville (Serra da Dona Francisca), 12.XII.2007, M.B. da Silva et al. leg., 2 3 & 2 Ƥ ( MZSP 27413). Paraná: Morretes (Porto de Cima), 18.VIII.1988, M.V. Segalla & Pollati leg., 1 3 ( MHNCI 6119); idem (Parque Estadual do Marumbi), 07.II.1988, R.L.C. Baptista leg., 1 3 ( MNRJ 6209); São José dos Pinhais (Usina de Guaricana), 7.VIII.1988, R. Pinto-da-Rocha, M.V. Segalla & J.C. Moura- Leite leg., 1 3 ( MHNCI 6130), Guaratuba (Usina de Guaricana), 04.II.1989, R. Pinto-da-Rocha et al. leg., 2 3 & 2 Ƥ ( MHNCI 6118); idem (Vila Cubatão), 07.II.1989, R. Pinto-da-Rocha et al. leg., 1 Ƥ ( MHNCI 6116); idem (Rio Bonito), 25°62’32’’S – 48°54’34’’W, XII.2005, M.B. da Silva et al. leg., 5 3 ( MZSP 27397); Ponta do Paraná (Reserva Ecológica da Ilha do Mel), 24.XI.1987, V. Moraes et al. leg., 1 3 ( MHNCI 6122); Limeira (Serra da Prata), 22.III.1992, M. Pichorin leg., 1 3 ( MZSP 29493); idem, 28.I.1992, 1 3 ( MZSP 29445); idem, 28.I.1992, 1 3 & 1 Ƥ ( MZSP 29405).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Mitobatinae |
Genus |
Promitobates difficilis (Mello-Leitão, 1931)
Bragagnolo, Cibele & Pinto-Da-Rocha, Ricardo 2012 |
Promitobates difficilis:
Kury 2003: 151 |
Soares 1949: 237 |
Soares 1945: 368 |
Batomites difficilis Mello-Leitão, 1931b : 141
Mello-Leitao 1931: 141 |