Chaetoceros curvisetus Cleve (1889: 55)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.314.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038587FE-5151-FFFC-6AE5-FA65DEC6F929 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chaetoceros curvisetus Cleve (1889: 55) |
status |
|
Chaetoceros curvisetus Cleve (1889: 55) View in CoL ( Figs 105–116 View FIGURES 105–116 )
References:— Hustedt (1930), Cupp (1943), Evensen & Hasle (1975), Hargraves (1979), Rines & Hargraves (1988), Hernández-Becerril
(1996), Jensen & Moestrup (1998), Hernández-Becerril & Flores Granados (1998), Shevchenko et al. (2006), Sunesen et al. (2008),
Kooistra et al. (2010), Lee et al. (2014a). Synonyms: — Chaetoceros secundus Schütt View in CoL , Chaetoceros cochlea Schütt.
Morphometry:—a.a.: 11–34 μm; p.a.: 8–30 μm.
LM:—Cells united in usually long chains; in pervalvar plane curved or spiral ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 105–116 ). Cells are broadly elliptical in valve view and rectangular in girdle view with drawn up valve corners. In each cell there is a single large plate-like chloroplast ( Fig. 106 View FIGURES 105–116 ). The valve face is markedly concave and the setae emerge from the valve corners immediately crossing each other at their point of origin with a short basal part. The apertures are large and elliptical to circular in shape ( Fig. 106 View FIGURES 105–116 ). The girdle is usually wide and the mantle is narrow. The setae are long and relatively thin. In girdle view they appear all curved towards the same convex side of the chain ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 105–116 ), while in the valve view they are all bent to one side of the apical axis. The intercalary and terminal setae are similar in morphology and orientation.
EM: —The valve has a hyaline central annulus with lighter centre encircled with a slightly darker marginal area from which extends a regular pattern of relatively thick and rarely dichotomously branched costae ( Fig. 107 View FIGURES 105–116 ). The pattern appears more complex towards the valve margin where, in some valves, a number of costae form small spirals. The marginal ridge possesses a low hyaline rim ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 105–116 ). A central or slightly eccentric rimoportula is present only in terminal valves. It is internally shaped as a simple slit and externally as a wide flattened tube ( Figs 108–110 View FIGURES 105–116 ). Girdle bands are adorned with transverse fine ribs alternating with rows of small round poroids ( Figs 111, 112 View FIGURES 105–116 ). Setae are circular in cross-section, ornamented with small poroids and shark fin shaped spines arranged in a spiral pattern ( Fig. 113 View FIGURES 105–116 ). The resting spore appears to be perforated with small poroids on the valve surface. Resting spores have unequally vaulted valves with the dome-shaped primary valve and less rounded to almost flat secondary valve. The surface of both valves is smooth ( Fig. 114 View FIGURES 105–116 ). Both valves of the resting spore bear a silica collar that is in the primary valve perforated by a series of elongated simple fissures ( Figs 115, 116 View FIGURES 105–116 ).
Distinctive features: —Chains curved in pervalvar plane, large oval apertures.All setae curved towards the convex side of the chain. Smooth resting spores with a collar. Valve ultrastructure showing a regular pattern of relatively thick and rarely dichotomously branched costae.
Chaetoceros decipiens Cleve (1873: 11) View in CoL [emend. Li, Boonprakob, Moestrup & Lundholm (2017: 5) View Cited Treatment ] ( Figs 117–127 View FIGURES 117–127 ) References:— Hustedt (1930), Cupp (1943), Evensen & Hasle (1975), Rines & Hargraves (1988), Hernández-Becerril (1996), Jensen &
Moestrup (1998), Berard-Therriault et al. (1999), Hernández-Becerril & Flores Granados (1998), Shevchenko et al. (2006), Sunesen et al. (2008), Li et al. (2017). Synonyms: — Chaetoceros grunowii Schütt.
Morphometry: —a.a.: 7–51 μm; p.a.: 8–43 μm.
LM: —Cells are united in straight chains, sometimes slightly curved in the apical plane ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 117–127 ). There are several ((2)4–10) small discoid chloroplasts present in each cell ( Figs 118, 119 View FIGURES 117–127 ). The valve face is weakly to strongly concave; the valve corners are sharp and drawn up, touching those of the sibling cell. Apertures are wide and elliptical. The mantle is high, usually with a distinct constriction near the margin. The girdle is usually lower than or equidimensional with the mantle. In cells from field samples there were often observed organic threads projecting from the girdle region ( Fig. 118 View FIGURES 117–127 ). The setae originate from the valve corners, fuse immediately at the chain margin and then diverge at an angle of ca 30° equally from the chain axis.All the setae are lying in the apical plane. The length of the fused part of the setae appears to be a very variable character with the extent of fusion varying even within a single chain and generally reduced in culture material. In most cases and especially in field samples setae can fuse for up to several times their diameter ( Fig. 118 View FIGURES 117–127 ), however, they can be also fused only at their point of cross over ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 117–127 ). The intercalary setae are very stiff, straight and variable in length. Terminal setae appear slightly thicker than intercalary ones, diverging from cell corners in a wide V-shaped curve. Resting spores were not observed.
EM: —The valve has a central annulus from which extends a pattern of radiating costae branching dichotomously towards the valve margin and becoming parallel on the valve mantle ( Fig. 120 View FIGURES 117–127 ). The hyaline areas between costae are densely perforated with poroids ( Figs 120, 122, 124 View FIGURES 117–127 ). A small rimoportula, with an internal distinct labiate structure ( Figs 123, 124 View FIGURES 117–127 ) and a very small external protrusion ( Fig. 121 View FIGURES 117–127 ), is present only on terminal valves. The marginal ridge is ornamented with a hyaline rim and siliceous projections which extend as fringes from the valve mantle ( Fig 120 View FIGURES 117–127 ). Projections may become large and slice-shaped in proximity of the valve apices ( Fig. 121 View FIGURES 117–127 ). These projections, in the intercalary valve, fuse with the corresponding structures of the sibling valve ( Fig. 120 View FIGURES 117–127 ) to form a hyaline structure that can partially occlude the aperture. Girdle bands are ornamented with transverse ribs alternating with less silicified rows of irregularly scattered poroids ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 117–127 ). The setae are polygonal, four- to five-sided ( Figs 126, 127 View FIGURES 117–127 ). Each side is ornamented with a single straight longitudinal row of large round-oval poroids. The size of poroids varies between 0.3 and 0.7 μm with a density of 14–22 poroids in 10 μm in the proximal and central part of the setae ( Fig. 126 View FIGURES 117–127 ). Larger poroids (up to 1.1 μm) have been rarely observed near the seta tip. Spines are shark fin-shaped and positioned along the setae ridges ( Figs 126, 127 View FIGURES 117–127 ).
Distinctive features: —Corners of sibling valves touching and forming a large aperture; intercalary setae usually fused for a variable distance. Setae stiff, extended in the apical plane, polygonal in cross section. Valve surface densely perforated with poroids. Rimoportula very small with a labiate structure.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chaetoceros curvisetus Cleve (1889: 55)
Bosak, Sunčica & Sarno, Diana 2017 |
Chaetoceros decipiens
Li, Y. & Boonprakob, A. & Gaonkar, C. C. & Kooistra, W. H. & Lange, C. B. & Hernandez-Becerril, D. & Chen, Z. & Moestrup, O. & Lundholm, N. 2017: 5 |
Cleve, P. T. 1873: ) |