Microcancilla brasiliensis ( Verhecken, 1991 ) Souza & Pimenta & Miyaji, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.29 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:65A114B2-4498-4496-9B59-AF2E3658B390 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0384272F-4D4A-FFEF-FF50-FB69013CF910 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Microcancilla brasiliensis ( Verhecken, 1991 ) |
status |
|
Microcancilla brasiliensis ( Verhecken, 1991) View in CoL comb. nov. ( Figs. 3 View Figure3 A-G)
Axelella brasiliensis Verhecken, 1991: 549 View in CoL , figs. 5-6.
Axelella brasiliensis View in CoL – Rios, 1994: 155, pl. 51, fig. 684 [reproduced from original illustration]; Miyaji, 2004: 79; Veitenheimer-Mendes et al., 2004: 97; Petit & Harasewych, 2005:32 [annotated list]; Rios,2009:298, fig. 751 [reproduced from original illustration].
Pseudobabylonella brasiliensis View in CoL – Petit, 2012: 4.
Type material: Holotype MNHN-IM-2000-2128.
Type locality: BRAZIL: Espírito Santo: MD-55 stn. SY 74 (18°58′S, 37°49′W, 682 m), coll. RV Marion Dufresne (P. Bouchet, J. Leal and B. Métivier), 27.v.1987.
Material examined: BRAZIL: São Paulo: Santos Basin (24°20′38″S, 43°50′32″W, 580 m), coll. 28.i.2009: MNRJ 28851 View Materials † [1] GoogleMaps ; Paraná: REVIZEE-Sul stn. 6652: MNRJ 28182 View Materials † [1] .
Measurements: MNRJ 28851: Whorls = 4.75; SL = 4.54; BWL = 2.97 mm; AL = 1.84 mm; SW = 2.47 mm; AW = 1.17 mm.
Geographic distribution: BRAZIL: Pernambuco to Paraná ( Verhecken, 1991, 2002; Miyaji, 2004; Veitenheimer-Mendes et al., 2004).
Bathymetric range: From 206 m to 637 m.
Remarks: Petit (2012) included this species in Pseudobabylonella Brunetti, Bella, Forli & Vecchi, 2009 , possibly by the statement of Brunetti et al. (2009: 66): “The new genus [Pseubabylonella], which is characterized mainly by the sculpture of the protoconch,comprise species previously included in Axelella and Babylonella ” [translated from Italian]. Brunetti et al. (2009) described a protoconch with numerous well-developed spiral and axial cords of sinuous outline.
The holotype of Microcancilla brasiliensis comb. nov. has an eroded protoconch ( Verhecken, 1991: fig. 6) which precludes the analysis of microsculpture. Verhecken (2002) reported new records of M. brasiliensis (as “ Axelella brasiliensis ”) and figured a more preserved protoconch, but the illustrations do not allow for an assessment of the microsculpture and no sculpture was described.
The additional material M. brasiliensis studied here shows microscopic pustules arranged fairly in spiral lines and at irregular intervals ( Figs. 3E, G View Figure3 ) on the protoconch, which differ from the sculpture pattern of Pseudobabylonella . The protoconch-teleoconch transition in M. brasiliensis is not clearly marked like in Pseudobabylonella , in which the reticulated teleoconch sculpture starts as faint axial ribs ( Fig. 3E View Figure3 ). Thus, the protoconch morphology of M. brasiliensis is more similar to M. phoenix , and we decide to include this species in Microcancilla rather than in Pseudobabylonella despite uncertainties.
Microcancilla phoenix ( Figs. 1 View Figure 1 A-H, 2A-F) has microscopic pustules covering the whole shell, not restrict- ed to the protoconch like M. brasiliensis . Additionally, M. phoenix has a more rounded aperture and subsutural region ( Figs. 1A, B View Figure 1 ), while M. brasiliensis has a more triangular aperture and a flatter shoulder ( Fig. 3A View Figure3 ).
Microcancilla microscopica and M. jonasi also differ by the more rounded aperture and by the wider parietal region ( Barros & Petit, 2007: figs. 1-5, 9).
Miyaji (2004) and Veitenheimer-Mendes et al. (2004) reported M. brasiliensis (as “ Axelella brasiliensis ”) from South Brazil in an annotated list of species without illustrations. The records reported by those authors are the southernmost records of M. brasiliensis (~ 26°S) and one of them is the shallowest record of the species at 206 m (MNRJ 28182).
RV |
Collection of Leptospira Strains |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Microcancilla brasiliensis ( Verhecken, 1991 )
Souza, Leonardo Santos de, Pimenta, Alexandre Dias & Miyaji, Cintia 2021 |
Pseudobabylonella brasiliensis
Petit, R. E. 2012: 4 |
Axelella brasiliensis
Rios, E. C. 2009: 298 |
Petit, R. E. & Harasewych, M. G. 2005: 32 |
Miyaji, C. & Amaral, A. C. Z. & Rossi-Wongtschowski, C. L. B. 2004: 79 |
Veitenheimer-Mendes, I. L. & Wiggers, F. & Pimpao, D. M. & Amaral, A. C. Z. & Wongtschowski, C. L. B. 2004: 97 |
Rios, E. C. 1994: 155 |
Axelella brasiliensis Verhecken, 1991: 549
Verhecken, A. 1991: 549 |