Triphoris pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:904D8C6D-A0C0-4D5A-960F-AEBACE141DF0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14206693 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0380CB2B-0498-15CB-FFB4-4CE8FE42FBBA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Triphoris pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863 |
status |
|
Triphoris pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863 View in CoL
Triphoris pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863: 105 View in CoL , pl. 22, fig. 3–4.
Triforis pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863 — Martens 1880: 282.
Mastonia pupaeformis ( Deshayes, 1863) — Hervier 1899: 310.
Trifora pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863 — Viader 1937: 43.
Triphora pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863 View in CoL — Jay 2007: 39, fig. 23–24, 53.
Type locality. Neotype’s locality: Reunion. Cape La Houssaye, Saint Paul, 20 m deep, but see Remarks .
Type material. MNHN-IM-2000-9492, neotype.
Distribution. Madagascar ( Dautzenberg 1923), Mauritius ( Viader 1937), New Caledonia ( Hervier 1899), Reunion ( Deshayes 1863; Martens 1880; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888; Jay 2007).
Remarks. The neotype designation of Jay (2007) is invalid as the specimen does not fit the original description (P.G. Albano pers. obs.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Triphoris pupaeformis Deshayes, 1863
Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G. 2022 |
Triphora pupaeformis
Jay, M. 2007: 39 |
Trifora pupaeformis
Viader, R. 1937: 43 |
Mastonia pupaeformis ( Deshayes, 1863 )
Hervier, R. P. J. 1899: 310 |
Triforis pupaeformis
Martens, E. von 1880: 282 |
Triphoris pupaeformis
Deshayes, G. P. 1863: 105 |