Botia Gray
publication ID |
z00401p001 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6270544 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/00307DF1-4568-2706-89B9-167D2E358CB8 |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
Botia Gray |
status |
|
Botia Gray View in CoL View at ENA ZBK
Botia Gray, 1831 ZBK (type species: Botia almorhae Gray, 1831 ZBK , by monotypy). Gender feminine.
Hymenphysa M'Clelland, 1839 ZBK (type species: Cobitis dario Hamilton, 1822 ZBK , by subsequent designation by Jordan, 1919a). Gender feminine.
Diacantha Swainson, 1839 ZBK (type species: Diacantha zebra Swainson, 1839 ZBK , by subsequent designation by Swain, 1883; spelled Diacanthus p. 190, first reviser [Eschmeyer, 1990: 123] retained Diacantha ZBK as correct original spelling). Gender feminine. [Eschmeyer considered D. zebra ZBK as type by monotypy; in fact Swainson originally included two species, D. zebra ZBK and D. flavicauda ZBK ]
Hymenophysa Bleeker, 1859 (incorrect subsequent spelling of Hymenphysa M'Clelland, 1839 ZBK )
Diagnosis. Distinguished from other genera within the subfamily Botiinae by the following combination of characters: Mental lobe developed in a barbel. Fronto-parietal fontanelle narrow. Anterior chamber of gas bladder almost entirely covered by bony capsule; posterior chamber large or rather reduced. Anterior process of premaxilla entire, not surrounding a cavity; rostral process rather long, with a more or less distinct ridge along inner edge. Top of supraethmoid narrow or broad. Optic foramen very small. Suborbital spine not strongly curved backwards (based on Taki, 1972: 74, 76). Suborbital spine bifid. Head naked.
Remarks. The spelling Hymenophysa used by Fang (1936), Nalbant (1963, 2002), Taki (1972) and others is not correct. The correct original spelling used by M'Clelland (1839: 443) is Hymenphysa ZBK . Hymenophysa of Bleeker (1859: 303) is an incorrect subsequent spelling of Hymenphysa M'Clelland, 1839 ZBK . Authors (e.g. Nalbant, 1963: 359, 2002: 317) often list Cobitis hymenophysa Bleeker, 1852 ZBK as type species of Hymenphysa ZBK by tautonymy. As the generic name predates the specific name by 13 years, this of course cannot be the case. In the original description of Hymenphysa ZBK , only three species are listed ( C. dario ZBK , C. geto ZBK , C. grandis ) and the type species has to be selected among them. The earliest valid type species designation is by Jordan (1919a: 195) who designated C. dario ZBK . Botia dario is placed in Botia s.s. ZBK by Nalbant (1963, 2002), Taki (1972) and others, and therefore Hymenphysa ZBK is a junior subjective synonym of Botia ZBK .
The valid name for the lineage called Hymenophysa by Fang, Nalbant, Taki and others is Syncrossus Blyth, 1860 ZBK .
Included species:
Botia almorhae Gray, 1831 ZBK (synonyms: B. grandis Gray, 1832 ZBK ,? B. rostrata Guenther, 1868 ZBK ;? B. lohachata Chaudhuri, 1912 ZBK ,? B. dayi Hora, 1932 ZBK )
Botia birdi Chaudhuri, 1910 ZBK (synonym:? B. javedi Mirza & Syed, 1995 ZBK )
Botia dario (Hamilton, 1822) (synonyms: Cobitis geto Hamilton, 1822 ZBK , Diacantha flavicauda Swainson, 1839 ZBK , D. zebra Swainson, 1839 ZBK )
Botia histrionica Blyth, 1860 ZBK
Botia kubotai ZBK , new species
Botia macrolineata Teugels, De Vos & Snoeks, 1986 ZBK
Botia striata Rao, 1920 ZBK (synonym: B. s. kolhapurensis Kalawar & Kelkar, 1958 ZBK )
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |