Agrophogonus hamulifer Olsen & Enghoff, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.675 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:88FFA67B-C2DE-43C6-ACB1-44EDCF119EBA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332929 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/646486B2-BF4F-45D9-9E74-E8FD6FC70DD5 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:646486B2-BF4F-45D9-9E74-E8FD6FC70DD5 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Agrophogonus hamulifer Olsen & Enghoff |
status |
sp. nov. |
Agrophogonus hamulifer Olsen & Enghoff View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:646486B2-BF4F-45D9-9E74-E8FD6FC70DD5
Figs 1 View Fig , 5C View Fig , 18 View Fig
Diagnosis
Resembles A. kiellandi and A. pusillokiellandi sp. nov. in having the postnodal telopodite slender, and having nodal process A spiniform, without an accessory basal process. Differs from these species in having the postnodal telopodite very long and evenly curved. Differs further from A. kiellandi by smaller body size (width 5.2–6.2 mm vs 8.7 mm in A. kiellandi ) and from A. pusillokiellandi sp. nov. (width 4.1 mm) by larger body size.
Etymology
The name is a Latin noun in apposition, meaning ‘carrying a small hook’ and refers to the resemblance of the postnodal telepodite to the curvature of a fishing hook.
Material examined
Holotype
TANZANIA • ♂; Iringa Region /district, West Kilombero Scarp FR; 07°53′19.5″ S, 36°23′11.6″ E; 1115 m a.s.l.; 25 Nov. 2000; Frontier Tanzania UMBS leg.; plot 17, Ukami, montane forest; NHMD 621678 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
TANZANIA • 11 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀, 29 juv.; same collecting data as for holotype; NHMD 621679 GoogleMaps • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same collecting data as for holotype; 1100–1130 m a.s.l.; 30 Nov. 2000; NHMD 621680 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 juv.; same collecting data as for holotype but 07°50′38.4″ S, 36°22′17.6″ E; 1390–1410 m a.s.l.; plot Paradiso; NHMD 621681 GoogleMaps .
Description
Males
SIZE AND SHAPE. Body length 27–31 mm. Maximum width 5.2–6.2 mm. W/L ratio 20%.
COLOUR ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). Very pale brown, darker around base of setae. Specimen stored in ethanol since 2000; thus, any pigmentation that may have been present in life is now faded.
STERNAL PROCESS ON BODY RING 6 ( Fig. 5C View Fig ). Long and slender, but broader towards basis and anterior end. Tip evenly rounded.
BODY RINGS. No transverse sternal carinae.
TELSON. Epiproct flattened at posterior end, forming a small vertical plane, with four protruding setae. Hypoproct semicircular to slightly triangular, paramedian tubercles large, extending beyond edge of sclerite. Setae on paraproct protruding from clear basal tubercles.
GONOPOD ( Fig. 18 View Fig ). Gonopod aperture suboval, extended back between second pair of legs on seventh segment, elevated in front of coxae, eliminated medially. Paracannular setae present. Nodal process L present, process M absent. Processes A and B slender and curved, process C longer than A and B. Processes B and C forcipulate in their curvature and position to each other. Postnodal telepodite very long, slender and acuminate, longer than in other members of the genus, without an abrupt flexure after nodus.
Distribution
Found at two separate locations within the same forest (Ukami) in the West Kilombero FR, Udzungwa Mts.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Gomphodesminae |
Genus |