taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03C50C6AFFECFF8184631E237168F981.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15626841/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15626841	Fig. 1. Tennessee Warblers’ stage of moult (i.e., percent of moult completed) over time during their fall migration stopover at the McGill Bird Observatory (MBO). (A) Visual representation of Tennessee Warblers’ flight feather moult stages (photos taken during 2021 and 2022 fall migration). (B) Graph showing the moult stage of individuals upon capture. Each point represents a date when an individual was captured at the MBO and their moult stage was recorded. This figure represents 72 individuals across 8 years (from 2013 to 2022).	Fig. 1. Tennessee Warblers’ stage of moult (i.e., percent of moult completed) over time during their fall migration stopover at the McGill Bird Observatory (MBO). (A) Visual representation of Tennessee Warblers’ flight feather moult stages (photos taken during 2021 and 2022 fall migration). (B) Graph showing the moult stage of individuals upon capture. Each point represents a date when an individual was captured at the MBO and their moult stage was recorded. This figure represents 72 individuals across 8 years (from 2013 to 2022).	2024-03-01	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.		Zenodo	biologists	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.			
03C50C6AFFECFF8184631E237168F981.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15626843/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15626843	Fig. 2. Barplot showing the number of radio-tagged Tennessee Warblers making migratory departures from the McGill Bird Observatory stopover on any given night during the fall season. Data are color-coded by year, and moult versus post-moult migrants are differentiated by pattern as seen in the legend.	Fig. 2. Barplot showing the number of radio-tagged Tennessee Warblers making migratory departures from the McGill Bird Observatory stopover on any given night during the fall season. Data are color-coded by year, and moult versus post-moult migrants are differentiated by pattern as seen in the legend.	2024-03-01	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.		Zenodo	biologists	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.			
03C50C6AFFECFF8184631E237168F981.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15626845/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15626845	Fig. 3. A boxplot illustrating the difference in stopover duration between moult and post-moult migrating Tennessee Warblers at the McGill Bird Observatory in southern Quebec. Stopover duration for post-moult migrants is defined as the number of days between their first capture and departure dates, while for moult migrants, it is their estimated arrival (based on their moult stage and an estimated moult rate (2.5%/day), assuming migrants arrived at the start of their moult) and their departure dates.	Fig. 3. A boxplot illustrating the difference in stopover duration between moult and post-moult migrating Tennessee Warblers at the McGill Bird Observatory in southern Quebec. Stopover duration for post-moult migrants is defined as the number of days between their first capture and departure dates, while for moult migrants, it is their estimated arrival (based on their moult stage and an estimated moult rate (2.5%/day), assuming migrants arrived at the start of their moult) and their departure dates.	2024-03-01	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.		Zenodo	biologists	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.			
03C50C6AFFECFF8184631E237168F981.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15626847/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15626847	Fig. 4. (A) Map of the West Island of Montreal showcasing the McGill Bird Observatory (MBO) and Motus tower locations. In the bottom left corner shows where the West Island of Montreal is located in northeastern North America. The blue circle indicates the area represented in map “B”. (B) Map of the 95% stopover home ranges (and their associated GPS points) of moult and post-moult migrating Tennessee Warblers at the MBO. Individuals were radio-tagged and tracked in 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022. Both maps use a 30 m resolution landscape cover layer from 2019 (obtained from Partenariat Données Québec). Map projection is WGS84, and the coordinate system used is UTM zone 11. Inset map data provided by Google © 2023, INEGI.	Fig. 4. (A) Map of the West Island of Montreal showcasing the McGill Bird Observatory (MBO) and Motus tower locations. In the bottom left corner shows where the West Island of Montreal is located in northeastern North America. The blue circle indicates the area represented in map “B”. (B) Map of the 95% stopover home ranges (and their associated GPS points) of moult and post-moult migrating Tennessee Warblers at the MBO. Individuals were radio-tagged and tracked in 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022. Both maps use a 30 m resolution landscape cover layer from 2019 (obtained from Partenariat Données Québec). Map projection is WGS84, and the coordinate system used is UTM zone 11. Inset map data provided by Google © 2023, INEGI.	2024-03-01	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.		Zenodo	biologists	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.			
03C50C6AFFECFF8184631E237168F981.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15626849/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15626849	Fig. 5. Probability of presence of migrating Tennessee Warblers within a 100 m radius area as predicted by a generalized linear mixed effects model. The model’s predictors include the proportion of forest and wetland, and the length of forest edge (in meters), and individual (bird ID) as a random effect. (A) shows the positive relationship between migrants’ presence and the amount of forest edge (coefficient = 3.27, p <0.001) and (B) shows the positive relationship between migrants’ presence and the proportion of forest (coefficient = 0.55, p <0.001).	Fig. 5. Probability of presence of migrating Tennessee Warblers within a 100 m radius area as predicted by a generalized linear mixed effects model. The model’s predictors include the proportion of forest and wetland, and the length of forest edge (in meters), and individual (bird ID) as a random effect. (A) shows the positive relationship between migrants’ presence and the amount of forest edge (coefficient = 3.27, p <0.001) and (B) shows the positive relationship between migrants’ presence and the proportion of forest (coefficient = 0.55, p <0.001).	2024-03-01	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.		Zenodo	biologists	Poirier, Vanessa;Frei, Barbara;Lefvert, Mathilde;Morales, Ana;Elliott, Kyle H.			
