taxonID	type	description	language	source
03CA0337FFACFFADFF73FD72FA41F988.taxon	description	(Figs 1 – 7)	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFACFFADFF73FD72FA41F988.taxon	type_taxon	Type species Hesperia gerasa Hewitson, 1867, designated by Godman (1901).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFACFFADFF73FD72FA41F988.taxon	etymology	Etymology Not informed by the author.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFACFFADFF73FD72FA41F988.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis This genus is distinguished from the other Pericharini genera by the following characters: male DFW with a continuous stigma between CuA 1 and 2 A, characterized by a row of scales along its external edge or several wavy-looking rows of scales (Figs 3 A, B), a unique feature among Pericharini genera. Male HW with the origin of Rs curved towards the costal margin (Fig. 3 C). Male genitalia (Figs 4, 5) with tegumen slightly projected over uncus; valva, harpe with bifid or trifid dorso-distal projections and spines; aedeagus, cornuti present, more conspicuous in O. vatinius. Female genitalia (Fig. 6) with the lamella antevaginalis formed by two lateral plates directing towards the lamella postvaginalis, and with a broad median projection in direction to lamella postvaginalis.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFACFFADFF73FD72FA41F988.taxon	description	Redescription Head: antenna dorsally and ventrally brown, base of club yellow; nudum, 15 – 16 segments. Eyelash present, brown and short. Eye red (Glassberg 2017). Thorax: mesotibia and metatibia not spined. Male DFW brown, with six or seven white hyaline spots in the discal cell, R 3 – R 4, R 4 – R 5, R 5 – M 1, M 2 – M 3, M 3 – CuA 1, and CuA 1 – CuA 2; continuous stigma between CuA 1 and 2 A, characterized by a row of scales on its external edge or several wavy-looking rows of scales (Figs 3 A, B), a unique feature among Pericharini genera. Female DFW brown with one more hyaline spot above 2 A. DHW brown in both sexes. FW with recurring vein; dcs present; distance between the origins of CuA 1 and CuA 2 wider than the origins between M 3 and CuA 1. Male HW with Rs curved towards costal margin (Fig. 3 C). Abdomen: male genitalia (Figs 4, 5) with tegumen wider than longer, projecting over uncus; ventral projection of tegumen in relation to valva, straight or oblique. Tegumen + uncus shorter than length of the valva. Uncus shorter than tegumen. Gnathos with dark punctuations or a few spines distally. Valva, harpe with bifid or trifid dorso-distal projections and spines; ampulla directed towards the dorsal or the distal portions; sacculus without setae. Fultura inferior with two antero-lateral projections. Aedeagus as long as the length of saccus + valva as in O. vatinius, or shorter as in O. gerasa; cornuti present, more conspicuous in O. vatinius. Female genitalia (Fig. 6) with lamella antevaginalis formed by two lateral plates directed towards the lamella postvaginalis with broad median projection directed towards the lamella postvaginalis. Lamella postvaginalis as a transversal line. Papilla analis rectangular, totally sclerotized in O. gerasa or with the posterior portion sclerotized in O. vatinius. Ductus bursae striated and longer than the corpus bursae.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	description	(Figs 1, 3 A, C, 4, 6 A, B, 7)	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	discussion	Taxonomic history Hesperia gerasa was described by Hewitson (1867) based on an unspecified number of specimens from Montes Áureos, [Municipality of Centro de Guilherme], Maranhão, Brazil. Hesperia gerasa was transferred to Goniloba Westwood, 1852 (Herrich-Schäffer 1869), Pamphila Fabricius, 1807 (Kirby 1871), and Proteides Hübner, [1819] (Mabille 1878). Mabille (1883) described Proteides porius based on an unspecified number of specimens from South America. Subsequently, Mabille (1889) described Proteides subcordatus based on an unspecified number of specimens from Chiriquí, Panama. After realizing that P. subcordatus was a homonym, Mabille (1891) designated Proteides milo as a new name for the species. When Godman (1901) proposed Orphe, Hesperia gerasa was transferred to this genus, and both species described by Mabille were synonymized with H. gerasa. Mabille (1904) transferred Proteides porius to Orphe, and this name was treated as a junior synonym of O. gerasa by Evans (1955).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	etymology	Etymology Not informed by the author.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis FW length: male, 20 – 22 mm; female, 22 – 23 mm. The male of this species superficially resembles P. pyrex; however, it can be easily distinguished from it by the stigma. The female is distinguished from P. pyrex by the lilac scales, whereas P. pyrex has dark yellowish scales in discal to anal areas of the VHW. Male and female wings ventrally with lilac scales in apical and submarginal areas (Figs 1 B, D). Stigma with a single row of grey scales along its edge in CuA 1 and 2 A (Fig. 3 A). Male genitalia (Fig. 4) with anterior projection of saccus shorter than the length of tegumen + uncus; uncus truncated posteriorly, with two distal tips sclerotized; gnathos shorter than uncus, with dark punctuations distally; valva, harpe with a dorso-distal spined bifid projection, ampulla directed dorsally; aedeagus with tiny and a few cornuti. Female genitalia (Figs 6 A – B) with lamella antevaginalis formed by two sclerotized lateral plates projected towards and exceeding the lamella postvaginalis; median projection of lamella antevaginalis not reaching the lamella postvaginalis.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	discussion	Comments In some males, the hyaline spot in CuA 1 – CuA 2 on FW is absent, a small spot still appears in M 1 – M 2. In females, the spot in M 1 – M 2 on FW is always present. In males, the two hyaline spots on FW in the discal cell are sometimes fused, forming a single spot, whereas in females the discal cell always has a single spot.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	materials_examined	Type material Hesperia gerasa was described and illustrated by Hewitson (1867) based on an unspecified number of specimens from Montes Áureos, [Municipality of Centro de Guilherme], Maranhão, Brazil, deposited in the Belt collection. One syntype male, found in NHMUK, has the following labels: / Type / Type / red label without information / Maranham [Maranhão, Brasil] Hewitson Coll. 70 - 69. Hesperia gerasa, Hew. /. Thus, in order to stabilize the identity of this species, this syntype is designated herein as the lectotype, adding the following two labels: / LECTOTYPUS / Lectotype Hesperia gerasa Hewitson, 1867 Suênia-Bastos, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2024 /. Proteides porius was described by Mabille (1883) based on an unspecified number of specimens from South America, but the type could not be found. Proteides subcordatus was described by Mabille (1889) based on an unspecified number of specimens from Chiriquí, Panama, firstly deposited in the Staudinger collection, then deposited at the MfN now. One syntype male, found in MfN, has the following labels: / Prot. Subcordatus HS ♂ / Coll. Staudinger / Lectotypus / Chiriqui / Perichares gerasa HW. / 127: 1 /. Thus, in order to stabilize the identity of this species, this syntype is designated herein as the lectotype, adding the following two labels: / LECTOTYPUS / Lectotype Proteides subcordatus Mabille, 1889 Suênia-Bastos, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2024 /. Material examined The remaining material examined: PANAMA: Panama, Ciudad de Panamá (Summit), 1 - VI- 1977, 1 ♂, Robbins leg., DZ 58.115 (DZUP). PERU: Madre de Díos, (Tambopata National Reserve), 12 ° 50 ’ S, 69 ° 17 ’ W, 300 m, 27 - X- 1991, 1 ♂, O. Mielke leg., 26 - X- 1991, 1 ♂, M. Casagrande leg., DZ 58.116, 58.117 (DZUP). San Martín, Moyobamba, 6 ° 02 ’ 13 ” S, 76 ° 58 ’ 22 ” W, 800 m, X- 2016, 1 ♀, J. Pintado leg., OM 81.329 (OM). Cuzco, (1 km NE Atalaya), 12 ° 52 ’ S, 71 ° 22 ’ W, 500 m, 7 - 11 - XI- 2012, 1 ♂, O. Mielke leg., OM 74.063 (OM). BRAZIL: Amapá, Serra do Navio, 29 - VII- 2007, 1 ♀, O. Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 58.118 (DZUP). Amazonas, (40 km S de Humaitá), 4 - VII- 2001, 1 ♀, O. Mielke leg., OM 53.725 (OM). Pará, (Rio Cuminá, Cachoeira da Paciência), 15 - X- 1936, 1 ♂, D’Almeida leg., DZ 58.133 (DZUP); Itaituba, 24 - VII- 1973, 1 ♀, M. Lauterjung leg., DZ 58.119 (DZUP). Acre, Porto Acre (Reserva Humaitá), 200 m, 8 - 10 - IX- 2004, 1 ♂, O. Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 58.120 (DZUP); Senador Guiomard (Reserva Catuaba), 200 m, 2 - 5 - IX- 2004, 1 ♂, O. Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 58.121 (DZUP), 15 - VII- 2004, 1 ♂, O. & C. Mielke leg., OM 64.772 (OM); Bujari (50 Km NO Bujari), 200 m, 1 ♂, 20 - 23 - VII- 2012, O. & C. Mielke leg., OM 65.744 (OM). Rondônia, Vilhena, 4 - XII- 1986, 1 ♂, C. Elias leg., DZ 58.122 (DZUP). Maranhão, Açailândia, 23 - VIII- 1974, 1 ♂, O. Mielke leg., DZ 58.123 (DZUP). Mato Grosso, Diamantino (Fazenda São João, Alto Rio Arinos), 300 – 400 m, 6 - V- 1978, 1 ♂, H. & H. D. Ebert leg., DZ 58.126 (DZUP). Minas Gerais, (Parque Estadual do Rio Doce), 200 m, 6 - IX- 1973, 1 ♀, H. Ebert leg., ex-coll. H. Ebert, DZ 58.124 (DZUP), 6 - IX- 1973, 1 ♂, H. Ebert leg., DZ 58.125 (DZUP). Espírito Santo, Conceição da Barra, VII- 1971, 1 ♀, C. & C. T. Elias leg., DZ 58.127 (DZUP).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	biology_ecology	Host plants The immatures feed on Arecaceae Schultz Sch. and Poaceae (R. Br.) Barnh. According to Moss (1949), the immatures in Pará (Brazil) feed on açaí (Euterpe Mart. *), though the species is not identified. Janzen and Hallwachs (2009) observed immatures feeding on Elytrostachys clavigera McClure.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA8FFA0FF73F9E9FCC8F87D.taxon	distribution	Geographical distribution (Fig. 7) Nicaragua: Región Autónoma del la Costa Caribe Sur (Anderson 2007); unknown locality (Evans 1955). Costa Rica: Guanacaste (Janzen and Hallwachs 2009). Panama: Chiriquí (Mabille 1889; Godman 1901); Panama (DZUP); unknown locality (Evans 1955). Colombia: unknown locality (Hayward 1947). Venezuela: unknown locality (Cong et al. 2019). Guyana: unknown locality (Evans 1955). Peru: Cuzco (OM); Madre de Díos (DZUP); San Martín (OM; Evans 1955). Brazil: Acre (Moss 1949; DZUP; OM); Amapá (DZUP); Amazonas (OM); Pará (DZUP); Rondônia (DZUP); Maranhão (DZUP; Hewitson 1867); Mato Grosso (OM); Minas Gerais (DZUP); Espírito Santo (DZUP); São Paulo (Francini et al. 2011).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	description	(Figs 2, 3 B, 5, 6 C, D, 7)	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	discussion	Taxonomic history Orphe vatinius was described by Godman (1901) based on six males from Guyana, Amazonas [Brazil], and Peru. Weeks (1906) described Pamphila brooksii based on an unspecified number of specimens from Suapure, [Bolívar], Venezuela. Draudt (1923) transferred P. brooksii to Turesis Godman, 1901, and Bell (1933) transferred it to Orphe Godman, 1901 claiming that this species was similar to O. vatinius due to the stigma on the forewing. Evans (1955) treated O. brooksii as a junior synonym of O. vatinius.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	etymology	Etymology Not informed by the author.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis FW length: male, 20 – 22 mm; female, 20 – 21 mm. The male of this species superficially resembles P. pyrex; however, it can be easily distinguished from it by the stigma. The female is distinguished from P. pyrex by the grey, sometimes light yellowish scales on the VHW, whereas P. pyrex has dark yellowish scales in the discal to anal areas of the VHW. Male wings ventrally covered with ferruginous scales (Fig. 2 B), and female VHW usually with grey, sometimes light yellowish, scales in central and submarginal areas, (Figs 2 D, F). Stigma with a wavy-looking rows of scales in CuA 1 and 2 A (Fig. 3 B). Male genitalia (Fig. 5) with anterior projection of saccus longer than the tegumen + uncus; uncus distally bifid; gnathos with a few spines distally; valva, harpe with a dorso-distal spined bifid projection; ampulla directed distally; aedeagus with several long cornuti. Female genitalia (Fig. 6 C – D) with lamella antevaginalis triangle-shaped formed by two lateral plates towards and not exceeding the lamella postvaginalis; median projection of lamella antevaginalis reaching the lamella postvaginalis.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	discussion	Comments In some males FW, two small hyaline spots are found in M 1 – M 2. The female sensu Evans (1955) presents the yellowish phenotype in the VHW from specimens from Colombia and Ecuador he examined. Two females from Costa Rica found in OM collection matched Evans’s description, and these specimens show hyaline spot in CuA 1 – CuA 2 on FW broader than in other female specimens. Despite these differences, the female genitalia are similar among these specimens.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	materials_examined	Type material Orphe vatinius was described by Godman (1901) based on six males collected in Guyana, Amazonas (Brazil), and Peru. One syntype male, found in NHMUK, has the following labels: / Type H. T. / Type / Massauary Hahn [el]. [Massauari, District of Boa Vista do Ramos] Amazons [Amazonas, Brasil] (Ex Staudinger) / male / B. C. A. Lep. Rhop. Orphe vatinius. Godm. / Godman-Salvin. Coll. 1914. - 5 /. Thus, in order to stabilize the identity of this species, this syntype is designated herein as the lectotype, adding the following two labels: / LECTOTYPUS / Lectotype Orphe vatinius Godman, 1901 Suênia-Bastos, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2024 /. Pamphila brooksii was described by Weeks (1906) based on an unspecified number of specimens from Suapure [Bolívar], Venezuela and deposited at the MCZ. One syntype male, found in MCZ, has the following labels: / A. G. Weeks Collection / M. C. Z. Type 16720 / Pamphila brooksii Weeks HOLOTYPE / Suapure, Ven., VII- 25 - 1899 /. Thus, in order to stabilize the identity of this species, this syntype is designated herein as the lectotype, adding the following two labels: / LECTOTYPUS / Lectotype Pamphila brooksii Weeks, 1906 Suênia-Bastos, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2024 /. Material examined The remaining material examined: COSTA RICA: Heredia, (Puerto Viejo de Sarapiquí), 16 - XII- 1995, 1 ♀, 23 - X- 1994, 1 ♀, Pagels leg., OM 53.072, 40.275 (OM). PERU: Madre de Díos, Manú (Rio Manú), 11 ° 58 ’ S, 71 ° 17 ’ W, no data, 1 ♂, I. Bohorquez leg., DZ 58.128 (DZUP); (Manú National Park), 11 ° 55 ’ 48 ” S, 71 ° 15 ’ 18 ” W, 340 m, 19 - X- 1991, 1 ♂, R. Robbins leg., DZ 58.129 (DZUP), 28 - IX- 1991, 1 ♂, O. Mielke leg., DZ 58.130 (DZUP), 28 - IX- 1991, 1 ♂, G. Lamas leg., DZ 58.132 (DZUP); Puerto Maldonado (Tambopata National Reserve), 12 ° 50 ’ S, 69 ° 17 ’ W, 300 m, 26 - X- 1991, 1 ♂, O. Mielke leg., DZ 58.131 (DZUP); (Shintuya, 3.3 km NE Albergue Pantiacolla), 12 ° 39 ’ 21 ” S, 71 ° 13 ’ 53 ” W, 400 m, 18 - 22 - VI- 2019, 1 ♂, 4 - 8 - XI- 2017, 1 ♂, O. Mielke leg., OM 88.627, 85.958 (OM). Loreto, Iquitos, 100 m, 30 - VII- 1992, 1 ♂, Büche leg., OM 35.595 (OM). ECUADOR: Napo, (Yanahurco), 550 m, 5 - IX- 1978, 1 ♂, Lafebre leg., OM 91.737 (OM). Cotopaxi, (Milimbanco), 3,900 m, IX- 1971, 1 ♂, Lafebre leg., OM 91.727 (OM). BRAZIL: Acre, Senador Guiomard (Reserva Catuaba-UFAC), 22 - IX- 2003, 1 ♂, 200 m, 2 - 5 - IX- 2004, 4 ♂, O. Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 58.134, 58.142 – 58.145 (DZUP), 17 - 19 - VII- 2004, 1 ♀, O. & C. Mielke leg., OM 65.181 (OM); Xapuri (Seringal Esperança), 200 m, 6 - 7 - IX- 2004, 1 ♂, O. Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 58.135 (DZUP); Porto Acre (Reserva Humaitá), 200 m, 8 - 10 - IX- 2004, 1 ♀, 1 ♂, O. Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 58.136 - 58.137 (DZUP); Bujari (50 km NO), 200 m, 10 - 12 - IX- 2004, 2 ♂, 25 - IX- 2003, 1 ♀, 1 ♂, O. Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 58.138, 58.141, 58.139, 58.140 (DZUP), 20 - 23 - VII- 2004, 5 ♂, O. & C. Mielke leg. OM 65.827, 65.480, 65.778, 65.365, 64.699 (OM); Rio Branco, 16 - VII- 2004, 1 ♂, O. & C. Mielke leg., OM 64.827 (OM). Rondônia, (Linha 105, km 4, 50 km N Ariquemes [Rio Crespo]), 10 - 22 - VII- 1991, 1 ♂, C. Mielke & Miers leg., OM 27.573 (OM). Mato Grosso, Cáceres (Coronel Rio Branco, Rio Vermelho), 400 m, 3 - VII- 1972, 1 ♂, 2 - VII- 1972, 1 ♂, O. Mielke & Brown leg., DZ 58.146, 58.147 (DZUP); Diamantino (Fazenda São João, Alto Rio Arinos), 10 - VII- 1978, 1 ♀, Furtado leg., OM 91.757 (OM).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	biology_ecology	Host plant According to Janzen and Hallwachs (2009), the immatures feed on Guadua paniculata Munro (Poaceae) in Costa Rica.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
03CA0337FFA4FFA3FF73FB65FE4FF970.taxon	distribution	Geographical distribution (Fig. 7) Costa Rica: Guanacaste (Janzen and Hallwachs 2009); Heredia (OM). Colombia: Boyacá (Hayward 1947); Putumayo (Cong et al. 2019); unknown locality (Evans 1955). Venezuela: Bolívar (Weeks 1906). Guyana: unknown locality (Godman 1901; Evans 1955). French Guiana, unknown locality (Evans 1955). Ecuador: [Bolívar] (Evans 1955); Cotopaxi (OM); Morona-Santiago (Williams and Hayward 1944); Napo (OM). Peru: Amazonas (Evans 1955); Loreto (OM; Evans 1955); Madre de Díos (DZUP; OM). Brazil: Acre (DZUP); Amazonas (Godman 1901); Mato Grosso (DZUP).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): Taxonomic revision of Orphe Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Pericharini: Orphina). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 131-144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.3
