identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03FA87F36F3DE50C3E26FB61BE3FFD34.text	03FA87F36F3DE50C3E26FB61BE3FFD34.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna (Lasiospron) (Benth.) Marechal, Mascherpa & Stainier	<div><p>VIGNA SUBG. LASIOSPRON (Benth.) Marechal, Mascherpa &amp; Stainier, Taxon 27: 201 (1978).</p><p>TYPE:  Vigna lasiocarpa (Benth.) Verdc., designated by Verdcourt (1970: 539).</p><p>Phaseolus section Strophostyles sensu Bentham, pro parte, Comm. Leg. Gen.: 74 (1837); Hassler in Candollea 1: 462 (1923), non Elliot; Piper in Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 22: 677 (1926).</p><p>Phaseolus section Strophostyles emend. Benth., in Martius, Flora Brasiliensis 15(1): 187 (1859).</p><p>Vigna section Lasiospron (Benth.) Verdc., Kew Bulletin 24: 539 (1970).</p><p>Perennials or occasionally annuals, scrambling or climbing (sinistrorsely) vines up to 5 m or more long, with foliage and reproductive parts covered with yellow hairs, these often over 1 mm long, some individuals also conspicuously invested with minute glandular hairs. Stems herbaceous, hollow, angulate (sturdy), older ones lignescent, frequently developing adventitious roots, stems and roots reported to have nodules. Leaves entire or seldom lobed, rarely with sinuous margins, membranaceous to chartaceous, oblong to ovate or widely ovate, sometimes rhombic or linear-lanceolate, usually obtuse or acute or even acuminate at apex, with 3 basal or supra-basal nerves (one prominent and central, and one to either side), lateral leaflets asymmetrical, lateral vein on the broader side diverging ca. 30, venation brochidodromus; stipules extended at the base or point of insertion, scarcely to distinctly and unequally bilobed or very distinctly spurred (sometimes adnate to the stem), membranaceous to chartaceous, triangular to lanceolate, 6–10-veined, not reflexed, persistent; stipels oblong to triangular, often trapezoidal, shorter than petiolules, glanduliferous due to glandular hairs; petioles mostly shorter than terminal leaflets, petioles and rachis bifacial, adaxially canaliculate, drying angled. Inflorescences few-flowered pseudoracemes, the flowers clustered at the apex, 2 flowers per node, the nodes adhering laterally to the rachis, swollen, with few to ca. 10 vestured glanduliferous orifices, these sparsely scattered or distributed in rows; primary and secondary bracts caducous, bracteoles mostly persistent at anthesis, as long or twice as long as the calyx tube, bracts and bracteoles lanceolate and at base geniculate, often spurred; pedicels shorter than calyx tube, longer and twisting in fruit, covered with straight, retrorse hairs; calyx campanulate, calyx-teeth generally short and subequal or forming two lips, the upper lobe broad and emarginate or the sinus as deep as the other three lower lobes, the lower lobe (two laterals and one central tooth) mostly equalling the tube length. Flowers predominately orange yellow or greenish yellow, glabrous; standard petal asymmetric, deeply emarginate or bilobed at apex, two parallel callosities on the centre of lamina at the point of folding, with two thick, fleshy auricles at the margins above the claw, the portion of the lamina immediately above the claw covered with micro-papillae; wing petals longer than keel, right wing (flower’ s right-side seen from the front) positioned clearly as a landing platform for visiting insects, the left wing (flower’ s left side) distally clasping around the left-side wall of the keel; keel distinctly beaked, loosely coiled to ca. 270 or through ca. 360, twisted to the right side of the flower, the keel wider at region of connation with wings; stamens 10, diadelphous, the single free stamen with a broad or cup-shaped appendage on the basal portion; pollen grains triporate, with coarsely reticulate exine, interstitium granular; ovary with a basal nectary disc less than 1 mm long, lobed distally; ovules few to many, style tenuous to variously thickened, with a short, curled or spreading pollen brush, twisted at the apex, thus placing the stigma sideways and mostly extended beyond the stigma and projected into a horn-like or hook-like appendage, stigma small, elliptic or transversely ovate, introrse [= opening inwards and a term usually referring to anthers] or terminal, sparsely ciliate. Fruit inverted by a post-pollination twisting of the pedicel, patent (diverging from the axis at ca. 90), or held erect (parallel to rachis), often placed on one side of the rachis (secund), straight to slightly falcate, subcylindrical or flattened, valves membranaceous or coriaceous, turning dark brown or black at maturity, covered with bristly, yellow, straight hairs, elastically dehiscent. Seeds asymmetrical, broader than long (D-shaped), compressed to subglobose (surrounded in fruit by a membranaceous whitish layer), hilum oblong, as long as seed width, covered by an epihilum and this often by a short epi-groove, with a distinctly raised rim-aril, and often with a conspicuous white membranaceous aril towards the lens. Seedlings with hypogeal germination. Chromosome number: 2 n = 20 or 22.</p><p>Etymology — Bentham (1837) possibly named this group of plants  Lasiospron to emphasize the hairiness of their pods: Lasio (hairy); spron (beak).</p><p>Taxonomic History —The taxonomy of this group of plants began with Bentham (1837), who published five new species in his taxonomic treatment of the genus  Phaseolus . In  Phaseolus section Strophostyles (Elliott) Benth., Bentham described  Phaseolus schottii,  P. longifolius, and  P. ovatus, and an unnamed  variety under the last. In addition,  P. hirsutus and  P. lasiocarpus were described under a newly proposed  Phaseolus section Lasiospron Benth. Bentham classified  P. pilosus Kunth (1823) under  Phaseolus section Leptospron Benth. In his treatment of the genus in  Flora Brasiliensis, Bentham (1859) synonymized  P. schottii under  P. longifolius,  P. hirsutus under  P. lasiocarpus, and recircumscribed  P. campestris Benth. (1837) . All these were included within P. section  Strophostyles and not within Bentham’ s P. section  Lasiospron . Chodat and Hassler (1904) and later Hassler (1923), in his treatment of the genus for South America, reduced all published taxa classified under P. section  Strophostyles to two species,  Phaseolus schottii with four varieties (and six formas) and  P. pilosus with two varieties. Piper (1926) recognized only four species in this group,  P. hirsutus,  P. campestris,  P. schottii, and  P. pilosus . Verdcourt (1970), as part of a taxonomic study of subtribe  Phaseolinae for the Flora of Tropical East Africa, which involved delimiting the genus  Phaseolus, transferred this group of species into the reinstated section under  Vigna Savi and recognized only three species,  V. lasiocarpa,  V. juruana, and  V. longifolia . Marechal et al. (1978) raised V. section  Lasiospron to the subgenus rank under  Vigna and followed Verdcourt’ s species classification. Lackey (1983) preferred the placement of V. subg.  Lasiospron under V. subg.  Vigna and followed again Verdcourt in recognizing only three species.</p><p>In sum, taxonomic misconception and uncertainties likely result, in part, from the similar morphologies of the six V. subg.  Lasiospron species, which are all adapted to thrive in riparian and wetland habitats. In addition, ambiguities occur in original species descriptions, such as Hassler’ s (1923) description of  P. schottii var. campestris, which combines diagnostic traits of more than one species (see Notes under  Vigna juruana). Imprecise label information of critical herbarium specimens causing taxonomic uncertainty is exemplified by  Vigna trichocarpa (see Notes under this species). Original and type specimens have been lost, as in the case of the holotype of  V. juruana . We thereby provide a modern taxonomic synthesis of  Vigna subg. Lasiospron, a group that has puzzled taxonomists for almost 200 yr.</p><p>Morphological, Ecological, and Karyological Traits (Figs. 5–6) —Habit. All species of  Vigna subg. Lasiospron are vines, mostly herbaceous and rarely woody and then mostly with age and at the base of the stem, which climb mainly on trees at forest edges particularly along riparian corridors. Stems. Mainly herbaceous, hollow or with a spongy pith, angulate (sturdy), becoming lignescent with age. Floating stems of  Vigna lasiocarpa have been reported carrying nitrogen fixing nodules on adventitious roots and on stems, but vascularly attached to the bases of adventitious roots (James et al. 2001). Vegetative multiplication by stems occurs in plants of  Vigna lasiocarpa (Pott and Pott 2000) . Climbing direction in  Vigna longifolia has been noted in the field label of the herbarium specimen Ahumada et al. 3373 (K), which records the direction of twining from left to right (sinistrorsum), when in other species it is from right to left. Leaves. The leaflets display a wide variation in size and shape even within the same species. They range in  form from narrowly linear to broadly ovate, sometimes even with lobes at the base. In addition to showing different shapes,  Vigna lasiocarpa leaflets have undulate margins. Due to this variation, leaflet shape and size are not reliable characters for species separation. Stipules and stipels. The stipules are moderately appendaged or distinctly produced below their point of insertion. The upper portion is generally lanceolate or widely triangular, and always conspicuously veined. The lower portion or appendage can be a single spur or bilobed (Fig. 5A–B). The texture varies from membranaceous to somewhat chartaceous and brittle. Stipules tend to be loosely fixed to stems, although often, as in  V. lasiocarpa, they are closely adnate to the stem. Stipels are mostly ovate, although trapezoidal forms also occur. They tend to be covered with minute glandular hairs forming a nectariferous area. Inflorescence and node ’ s extrafloral nectary. The inflorescences of  Vigna subg. Lasiospron are pseudoracemes, where all secondary branches have been completely reduced and transformed into cushion-like glanduliferous nodes that generally carry two flowers each. These nodes are attached laterally to the inflorescence rachis and have few to ca. 10 vestured secretory orifices or extrafloral nectaries (Marazzi et al. 2019). These orifices are distributed sparsely or in close rows (Fig. 5C–F). In  Vigna subg. Lasiospron species the shape of these nodes varies, as does the placement of the secretory orifices. The nodes in  Vigna juruana are spatuliform, and the orifices are distributed in a scalariform pattern, with transverse separations, whereas in  Vigna lasiocarpa, the nodes are elliptical and voluminous, and the orifices are displayed in two rows. In other species of the subgenus, they are subspherical or obpyriform, with the orifices distributed in a sparse-alternate pattern, and no transverse separations are visible.</p><p>Although notably different in shape and orifice distribution, the nectaries present in  Vigna subg. Lasiospron may have a similar vascular supply to that found in  Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. (Kuo and Pate 1985). These extrafloral nectaries in  V. lasiocarpa have been reported to be active during the day even when the plants are fruiting (Lewis and Owen 1989) and are often visited by bees of the genus  Trigona (da Silva et al. 2384) and by other  Hymenoptera (Hoc et al. 1993) . In Argentina, Hoc et al. (1993) registered wasps and ants actively sucking nectar from the inflorescence nodes. Ants were observed patrolling the plant displaying deterrent behaviour against other visitors to the plant. Flower. Flower colour varies from yellow to greenish yellow (Fig. 5D). The standard petal is deeply emarginate or bilobed at its apex and is sometimes not fully extended because the standard bends backwards in anthesis, leaving a portion of the margins joined to form a hood. On the internal face of the standard petal, two parallel thickenings or appendages, and two prominent, thick fleshy auricles, are located above a short petal claw. The concavity or furrow produced by the backward bending of the standard at anthesis, enclosed by the parallel thickenings and auricles, is papillate. This protected region directs the bee’ s mouth parts to the nectary, which is located at the base of the gynoecium.</p><p>Wing petals are adnate to the keel by their claws, and by their positioning upon the keel lateral pocket. Wing sculpturing occurs mainly on the right-side wing (as observed from the front of the flower). The sculpturing is in a lamellate pattern in the upper basal and upper central regions of the petal, and the upper basal margins of the petal are incurved. The auricles in the upper basal region are thick and fleshy, and in  V. juruana a line of four to five hairs or cilia are present. These interlock with the basal auricles of the standard. The right-side wing petal extends distally and rotates to form a landing platform, whereas the left-side wing is held vertically and distally embraces the keel, thus blocking entry to the nectary by unwanted flower visitors.</p><p>Keel petals are united to each other for almost their whole length and form a tubular structure that encloses the androecium and gynoecium. The keel is curved at its mid-length position and there held erect between the wings; distally it is curved and rotated towards the right side of the flower. The two keel petal claws are strongly adnate to the staminal tube, whereas their lateral basal walls have a concave pocket and fold which attaches them to the wing petals, thus forming a lever mechanism of the four united petals when a pollinator lands on them. A semi-circular opening of the keel apex exposes the protruding stigma which is adjusted for nototribic or pleurotribic pollination.</p><p>The androecium is diadelphous and comprises nine stamens partially united to form a staminal sheath or tube, and one free vexillary stamen. The vexillary stamen filament has a conspicuous appendage just above its base. The appendage upper surface is verrucate. Verrucate surfaces are also present on adjacent margins of the staminal tube, constituting a shield that protects the ovary, as a visiting insect’ s proboscis searches for the basal fenestrae that lead to the nectary cavity. Stamen filaments are cylindrical with vascular traces running internally. The walls of the filaments have spirally coiled, free, elongate epidermal cells (Fig. 6A–B). These stretchy interweaved walls may provide the filament with some degree of elasticity that may play a role in promoting pollen transfer to the stylar pollen brush. Anthers are uniform, oblong in shape, basifixed to almost dorsifixed, and of longitudinal dehiscence.</p><p>Pollen grains are characterized by being triporate and with a wide reticulum, as seen in other species of  Vigna (Marechal et al. 1978) . Their shape is suboblate to oblate, with a semi-angular to angular outline as viewed from the polar region (Fig. 6D–F). Pores comprise a globular to granulate operculum membrane. Pollen studies have described the interstitium as granular (non-orientated to orientated, and without a foot layer; Horvat and Stainier 1980; Ferguson and Skvarla 1983). However, the interstitium has been reported for  Vigna lasiocarpa as columellar (Di Stilio 1994).</p><p>The gynoecium comprises a sessile, non-stipitate, straight ovary, with a lobed basal nectary disc confined within the base of the staminal tube. The length of the style is highly variable and ranges from around 1.5 cm in  V. juruana to 5–6 mm in  V. lasiocarpa . The style is thread-like or tenuous for about one-third of its length, then thickened uniformly for the next third, and narrows once again for the final third. A pollen brush is confined to the upper part of the style and is made up of curly (Fig. 6H) or straight hairs (Fig. 6I). The style-tip may be curved inwards to very different degrees, placing the stigma in a subterminal position (Fig. 6G), except in  V. juruana where it is in an apical position (Fig. 6I). The stigma bears a whorl of non-receptive, short hairs (Drewes and Gamba 2011). In mature flowers of  Vigna lasiocarpa the stigma surface produces a copious exudate and is located at the opening of the keel.</p><p>Pollination Studies —Flowers of  Vigna longifolia and  V. diffusa are effectively pollinated by bees of the genus  Megachile, and  V. diffusa by  Apis mellifera,  Bombus morio, and  Xylocopa brasilianorum (Hoc et al. 1993; Souza et al. 2017, initially reported as  V. longifolia but later determined to be  V. diffusa). Pollen transference is nototribic, placing the pollen in an area between the head and thorax of the bee, or pleurotribic and sternotribic, in the case of the deposition of the pollen of  V. diffusa in the entire metasoma, where the pollen brush slides from the dorsal to the ventral region in  Megachile spp. (Hoc et al. 1993; Souza et al. 2017). Label data of da Silva et al. 2384 (in herb.) mentioned that large bees (Fig. 6E) are struck by the stigma on the side of their bodies (pleurotribic) while visiting the flowers of  V. lasiocarpa .</p><p>Fruit and Seeds —The pods in  Vigna subg. Lasiospron are usually laterally flattened, with chartaceous, thin valves (Fig. 5G). However, in  Vigna lasiocarpa and  V. longifolia the pods are nearly cylindrical, with their valve walls thicker than those of the rest of the species in the subgenus. Pod valves are covered with golden-yellow appressed hairs which turn black on drying. Pods are usually elastically dehiscent (Fig. 5H) along both sutures and the pedicels rotate and twist as the fruit matures, presenting it in either an ascending or pendent position. In an ascending position the abaxial suture faces the inflorescence axis, whereas in the pendent position the abaxial suture faces upwards. Seed orientation in the pod is mostly with its long axis parallel to the suture, although in  V. lasiocarpa it tends to be somewhat oblique. Funicles in nearly all species are short, except in  V. trichocarpa where they are approximately 1 mm.</p><p>Seeds vary in size and shape and are sometimes almost isodiametric to oblong-elliptic. Although more generally flattened to some extent, in  V. lasiocarpa and  V. longifolia seeds tend to be subglobose. In these two species, a white hippocrepiform aril develops at the edge of the hilum (Fig. 5I); the other four species have variable or no aril development (Table 1). Arils are found also in some species of Old World  Vigna such as in wild plants of  Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal (Takahashi et al. 2016) . A comparison of some morphological characters of the species of V. subg.  Lasiospron is presented in Table 1.</p><p>Seed Dispersal —Marsh deer, waterfowl, and cattle have been seen eating the foliage and seeds of  Vigna species in the Brazilian Pantanal (Pott and Pott 1994, 2000). Waterfowl species that breed in North America and winter in Central and South America and the Antilles, which migrate across the Atlantic to Africa, are potentially able to disperse seeds over long distances (Somenzari et al. 2018). Species with a seed aril could be dispersed by birds and vertebrates. The widest ranging New World species,  Vigna lasiocarpa and  V. longifolia, have seed arils that are consistently well developed. In contrast, the least widely ranging species,  Vigna schottii, has seed arils that are variably developed. However, the three amphi-Atlantic species,  Vigna trichocarpa,  V. juruana, and  V. diffusa, have seed with little or no aril development (Table 1), suggesting the development of cartilaginous arils is not required for long distance trans-oceanic dispersal.</p><p>Chromosome Numbers —Chromosome counts of three  Vigna subg. Lasiospron species have been reported (Marechal 1969; Senff et al. 1992, 1995; Mercado-Ruaro and Delgado-Salinas 1996; Schifino-Wittmann 2000).  Vigna diffusa (as  V. longifolia) and  V. longifolia have 22 somatic chromosomes, with counts of 2 n = 22, whereas  V. lasiocarpa is a dysploidy species, with a chromosome count of 2 n = 20. These counts conform with the overall pattern found in  Vigna (Goldblatt and Johnson 1979; Costa et al. 2019), which is a base chromosome number of n = 11 being most common, and base number of n = 10, 12, and others uncommon.</p><p>Synapomorphies of  Vigna Subg. Lasiospron —In a mature flower, the distal portion of the keel twists to the right-hand side of the corolla, often into a complete coil. Pedicels, which are shorter than the calyx tube, twist following pollination to render the adaxial suture of the fruit upside down (resupinate). Fruits are pendent or ascending and their valves turn brown or black at maturity.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F3DE50C3E26FB61BE3FFD34	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
03FA87F36F35E50C3F24FCC2BF82FAB1.text	03FA87F36F35E50C3F24FCC2BF82FAB1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna (Lasiospron) (Benth.) Marechal, Mascherpa & Stainier	<div><p>KEY TO THE SPECIES OF  VIGNA SUBG. LASIOSPRON</p><p>1. Stipules scarcely to distinctly bilobed, below the point of insertion............................................................................. 2</p><p>2. Upper extension of stipules 3 mm long; calyx 2–2.5 mm long; flowers pale greenish yellow, 8–10 mm long; style not extended beyond stigma, stigma apically placed; pollen brush 1 mm long, with hairs curled; fruit flattened..............................................1.  Vigna juruana</p><p>2. Upper extension of stipules 3–12 mm long; calyx 3–10 mm long; flowers orange to golden yellow, 12–35 mm long; style extended beyond stigma, stigma laterally placed, pollen brush 3–6 mm long, hairs spreading; fruit flattened or cylindrical............................................. 3</p><p>3. Upper extension of stipules 2–4 mm wide, membranaceous to chartaceous, up to 10-veined; calyx 3–3.5 mm long; inflorescence rachis with 2–3 nodes; style extension projecting into a small crustaceous horn-like appendage; ovules 8–10 per ovary; pods oblong, flattened, thin-valved; seed without rim-aril..................................................................................... 2.  Vigna diffusa</p><p>3. Upper extension of stipules 1–2 mm wide, chartaceous, up to 6-veined; calyx 4–10 mm long; inflorescence rachis with 3–8 nodes; style-extension projecting into a horny, hook-like appendage; ovules 10–18 per ovary; pods linear to slightly falcate, cylindrical, thick-valved; seed with rim-aril............................................................................................................... 4</p><p>4. Inflorescence rachis with 2–4 nodes; calyx 4–5 ˟ 2–3 mm, sparsely hirsute to strigose at base, upper teeth slightly divided, narrow and acute, not forming a lip; keel-beak not quite completing one coil; pods linear to slightly falcate, 4–8 ˟ 0.5 cm, tapering to the apex, rostrum ca. 5 mm long........................................................................................ 3.  Vigna longifolia</p><p>4. Inflorescence rachis with (3–)5–8(–9) nodes; calyx 5.5–10 ˟ 3.5–8 mm, densely hirsute-strigose, upper teeth deeply divided and broadly rounded at apex to form a lip; keel beak fully completing one coil; pods linear-oblong, 6–9 ˟ 0.7–1.1 cm, abruptly truncate at the tip, rostrum 2–3 mm long.........................................................................................4.  Vigna lasiocarpa</p><p>1. Stipules distinctly spurred, below the point of insertion....................................................................................... 5</p><p>5. Inflorescence rachis with 4–6 nodes, nodes oblong, spatuliform, orifice distribution scalariform, with transverse separations; calyx 1.5–2 mm long, teeth 0.5 mm long; flower 8–12 mm long; pollen brush 2–3 mm long; pod oblong, flattened, (3–) 3.5–4 cm long, 7–8 mm wide, ascending............................................................................ 5.  Vigna trichocarpa</p><p>5. Inflorescence rachis with 3–5(–8) nodes, nodes subspherical, obpyriform, orifice distribution sparse-alternate, without transverse separations; calyx 3–4 mm long, teeth 1 mm long; flower 12–14 mm long; pollen-brush 3.5–4 mm long; pod linear, subcylindrical, 4–6 cm long, ca. 6 mm wide, patent or ascending............................................................................................................ 6.  Vigna schottii</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F35E50C3F24FCC2BF82FAB1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
03FA87F36F35E5093DEBFA6DBBFEFC20.text	03FA87F36F35E5093DEBFA6DBBFEFC20.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna juruana (Harms) Verdc., Kew	<div><p>1.  VIGNA JURUANA (Harms) Verdc., Kew Bulletin 24: 540 (1970).</p><p>Phaseolus juruanus Harms, Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berl. 7: 506 (1921).</p><p>TYPE:   BRAZIL. Amazonas,  Jurua miry, Jul 1901, E. Ule 5533 (holotype: B, presumably destroyed ;  isotypes: K!,  U!). Figure 7.</p><p>Phaseolus campestris sensu Benth., in Mart., Flora Brazil. 15(1): 188 (1859). TYPE: BRAZIL. “in Braziliae septentrionalis campis et pascuis ad Para.” Martius s.n. (lectotype M!, designated here), nom. illeg., non  P. campestris Benth., Comm. Legum. Gen.: 77 (1837), non  Vigna campestris (Mart. ex Benth.) R.Wilczek, in Fl. Congo Belge 6: 391 (1954). See nomenclatural notes below.</p><p>Phaseolus schottii var. campestris forma brasiliensis Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923. TYPE: BRAZIL. “Alto Amazonas: ad ostium fluminis Saliman [sic]”, Spruce 1641 (lectotype: K, herb. Benth., designated here; isolectotypes: G, K!, M!), synon. nov., non  P. schottii var. campestris forma guyanensis Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923. TYPE: FRENCH GUIANA. Poiteau s. n. (holotype: G), synon. nov., non  P. schottii var. campestris forma transiens Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923. TYPE: BRAZIL. Bahia in pratis humidis, Salzmann s.n. (holotype: G; isotypes: K!, MO!). See nomenclatural notes below.</p><p>Phaseolus schottii Benth. var. tucumanensis Hassl., Candollea 1: 464 (1923). Type: Argentina. Tucuman, cumbre de Anfama, alt. 2500 m, Schreiter 866 (holotype: Herb. Osten, not seen). See nomenclatural notes below.</p><p>Perennials or annuals (?), procumbent or climbing vines up to 3 m, with foliage and reproductive parts covered with minute glandular hairs, and sparse or dense pubescence. Stems hollow, slightly woody at base, often with adventitious roots, sparsely to densely strigose, with yellow to reddish, retrorse hairs. Leaves with stipules ovate to narrowly-lanceolate, unequally bilobed, upper portion ca. 3 mm long, 1–2 mm wide, 5–6-veined, not reflexed, persistent; lower portion ca. 2 mm long, sparsely pilose; stipels oblong or triangular, ca. 1 mm long, subequal in length to petiolules, glabrous except for minute glandular trichomes; petioles 3.5–11 cm long, covered with retrorse hairs, rachis considerably shorter, ca. 0.5–2.5 cm long, with some antrorsely appressed hairs on the adaxial side, canaliculate; leaflets entire, ovate to narrowly ovate, or lanceolate, acute at apex, with raised veins below, membranaceous, sparsely to densely strigose, terminal leaflet 4–12 ˟ 1.5–9 cm, lateral leaflets 4.5–10.5 ˟ 2–7 cm. Inflorescences up to 15 cm long, peduncles ca. 13.5 cm long, covered with short retrorse hairs, densely strigose distally; rachis 1.5–2 cm long, with 5–8(–10) swollen, oblong, 2–3 mm long nodes, 5–8 orifices alternately distributed, flowers clustered distally; primary bracts caducous, secondary bracts ca. 6 mm long, caducous; bracteoles mostly persistent at anthesis, ca. 4.5 mm long, longer than calyx tube; pedicels shorter than calyx tube, 1–1.5 mm long, longer and twisting in fruit, covered distally with straight, retrorse hairs; calyx campanulate, sparsely strigose at the base, glabrous distally, ca. 2 ˟ ca. 1.5 mm, upper teeth slightly divided, narrow and acute, not forming a lip, teeth triangular, subequal, 0.5 mm long, lower tooth slightly longer than lateral teeth. Flowers pale greenish yellow, 8–10 mm long; standard petal asymmetric, broadly ovate, ca. 8 ˟ ca. 8 mm, bilobed at apex, two parallel callosities on the lamina above the point of folding, two fleshy auricles above a short claw; wing-petals longer than keel, with an obovate lamina, ca. 1 cm long, 5–6 mm wide, with an auricle at base, claw ca. 3 mm long; keel distinctly beaked, twisted through ca. 270, the apex hook-like; ca. 7 mm above wing petals, with transverse pockets above the claws, claws ca. 2 mm long, fused to staminal tube; androecium ca. 1 cm long, vexillary stamen with a basal appendage; anthers oblong-ovate, ca. 1 mm long, basifixed to sub-basifixed to filaments; pollen grains triporate, with a coarsely reticulate exine; ovary straight, with a basal nectary disc ca. 0.5 mm long, ovules 8–9 per ovary, style with a tenuous lower part, upper portion thickened, cylindrical, curved, pollen-brush ca. 1 mm long, with curled hairs; stigma globose, apical. Fruit patent, linear-oblong to slightly falcate, flattened, valves thin-walled, not constricted between the seeds, turning dark brown or black at maturity, 4–7 cm long, 4–7 mm wide, elastically dehiscent, sparsely strigose, with yellow, straight hairs, beak 1 mm long, straight. Seeds D-shaped, 3.5–6.5 ˟ 3–4 mm, surface smooth, testa dark brown, mottled lighter brown, hilum oblong, as long as seed width, rim-aril distinctly raised, covered by an epihilum, without aril. Figure 7.</p><p>Illustrations — Wilczek (1954) as  Vigna campestris (Fig. 7).</p><p>Distribution and Habitat —Southern Mexico (Tabasco), Central America (Costa Rica, Honduras, Panama), and South America (Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, French Guiana, Suriname); also including Trinidad (Republic of Trinidad and Tobago). Likely native in west and central Africa (Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Central Africa Republic, and Nigeria; Fig. 3). Seasonal or permanently flooded plains or in riverine forests; in South America, in the Solim ~ oes River and Amazon River basin and eastern Restinga Atlantic Forest. Sometimes reported growing on the floodplains of Amazonian black water and clear water rivers (i.e. Igapo, common name “feij ~ ao do Igapo”), sprawling in floating plant islands or growing in old rice fields; altitudinal range mostly 0–700 m (collected at 1400–1600 m in the Peruvian Ucayalli Department). This species grows in habitats similar to  V. trichocarpa and  V. longifolia with which it is sometimes sympatric (e.g. Iquitos, Peru). Flowering and fruiting have been registered all year except for June.</p><p>Etymology —Named after the River Jurua in Brazil.</p><p>Vernacular Names —“Soematalan” (Amshoff 1939); “feij ~ ao do Igapo” (Froes 21065); “frijolillo” (Colombia); “namiata” (French Guiana, Wayapi); “porotillo” (Peru); “kwakwa” (Wilczek 1954).</p><p>Representative Specimens Examined —See Appendix 1 for complete list. Bolivia. — PANDO: Manuripi, a lo largo del arroyo Bay, entre el campamento Bay y La Poza, 17 Oct 1989, St. G. Beck 19433 (MEXU). Brazil. — AMAPA: Rio Araguari, vicinity Camp 12, 1 10'60”S, 52 7'60”W, 30 Sep 1961, J. Murca Pires 51366 (MICH, US). Colombia. — AMAZONAS: Leticia, Rıo Amazonas, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.983334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.6833334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.983334/lat 4.6833334)">Isla de Mocagua</a>, frente del Vergel, Lago Resaca, 3 51'0”S, 70 15'0”W, 110–120 m, 3 Oct 1991, A. Prieto 92 (MO). Costa Rica. — ALAJUELA PROVINCE: Los Chiles, R. V. S. Ca no ~ Negro, cuenca del <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.983334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.6833334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.983334/lat 4.6833334)">Rıo Frıo</a>, 10 53'18”N, 84 46'37”W, 60 m, 27 Sep 2000, L. Acosta et al.2772 (G). French Guiana. Cayenne, Saut Nacibo, 4 41'0”N, 52 59'0”W, 20 m, 25 Mar 1994, B. Bordenave 892 (K). Guyana. <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.983334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.6833334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.983334/lat 4.6833334)">Essequibo Isl.</a> - W Demerara, lower 7 km of <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.983334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.6833334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.983334/lat 4.6833334)">Tiger Creek</a>; 6 30'0”N, 58 39'0”E, 15 m, 11 Dec 1992, T. W. Henkel 403 (US). Honduras. — ATLANTIDA DEPARTMENT: Tela River near Puerto Sierra, 3 May 1903, P. Wilson 669 (NY). Mexico. — TABASCO: a 300 m de la desviacion del Rıo Gonzalez, hacia Boca Grande, 14 Feb 1990, M. A. Maga na ~ A 2255 (MEXU). Panama. — PANAMÁ PROVINCE: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-65.666664&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=1.65" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -65.666664/lat 1.65)">Fort Clayton</a>, Canal Zone, 14 Jul 1966, J. D. Dwyer 4584 (MEXU, MO). PERU. — HUÁNUCO DEPARTMENT: Estacion Experimental Agrıcola, 701 m, 4 Dec 1945, R. J. Seibert 2268 (F, US). Suriname. Lucie Rivier, 2–10 km below confluence of Cost Rivier, 225 m, 9 Sep 1963, H. S. Irwin 55541 (NY). Trinidad. Nariva Swamp, E of Sand Hill, 5 Apr 1977, C. D. Adams 14246 (K). Venezuela. — AMAZONAS: Departamento <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-65.666664&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=1.65" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -65.666664/lat 1.65)">Rıo Negro</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-65.666664&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=1.65" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -65.666664/lat 1.65)">Rıo Siapa</a>, near base of Cerro Aracamuni, 1 39'0”N, 65 40'0”W, 4 Nov 1987, 250 m, R. Liesner 22785 (MO). Cameroon. Bipinde, Urwaldgebeit, Dec. 1912, G. Zenker 4300 (M). Central African Republic. Left bank of Mambere R., near Bania, 26 Nov 1965, A. J. M. Leeuwenberg 7040 (K). Democratic Republic Of The Congo. Jangauellei, ile Esali II, 12 Jul 1988, J. Louis 10294 (K). Nigeria. River Old Calabar, 1863, G. Mann 2319 (K).</p><p>Notes —In  Martius Flora Brasiliensis, Bentham (1859) described  Phaseolus campestris, a name already used (Bentham 1837) and thus a later homonym and illegitimate under Article 53 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Turland et al. 2018) and unavailable for use (Verdcourt 1970). Hassler (1923), while possibly considering that Bentham (1837) listed  Phaseolus schottii before  V. longifolia, published four varieties,  P. schottii var. genuinus,  P. schottii var. campestris,  P. schottii var. longifolia, and  P. schottii var. tucumanensis . Under  P. schottii var. campestris, Hassler combined characters diagnostic of different taxa and, in consequence, listed specimens of different taxa under his new combinations. Under  P. schotti var. campestris forma brasiliensis he cited three collections from Brazil: Minas, in silvis ad Salgado [sic.],  Martius 1680 (M!), since identified as  V. luteola (refer to Verdcourt 1970: 540); Alto Amazonas: ad ostium fluminis Saliman [sic], Spruce 1641 (G), identified here as  V. juruana; and a collection from Bahia by Salzmann 182 (G), here identified as  V. trichocarpa . The exact locality of Spruce’ s specimen has been established by consulting the expedition notes in Spruce (1851–1855). He recorded his collection numbered 1641, collected in Solim oes ~ and Manaquiry, on June 1851, as a  Phaseolus close to  P. ovatus ( P. ovatus aff.). Such information only appears on one of the two sheets of Spruce 1641 at K (herb. Benth.), and we have designated this specimen as the lectotype of  P. schottii var. campestris . Amshoff (1939) considered  P. schottii var. campestris f. guyanensis Hassl. as a synonym of  Phaseolus trichocarpus . Unfortunately, original material could not be found at P, and the description does not give enough information to elucidate its identity; therefore, we accept Amshoffs judgment here. Concerning the type of  Phaseolus schottii var. campestris f. transiens Hassl., see statements under  Vigna trichocarpa in this treatment.</p><p>Vigna juruana has the smallest flowers of all  Vigna subg. Lasiospron species and has a very distinctive style on its gynoecium. The style has a tenuous lower part, with a thicker, cylindrical, and curved upper portion, which becomes rather slender again towards the stigma. Its pollen brush is short and with unique curled short hairs. In addition, the style has no extension beyond the stigma, a characteristic seen in all other species of V. subg.  Lasiospron .</p><p>We have not seen the type of  Phaseolus schottii var. tucumanensis, and despite Hassler’ s lengthy description in the taxon protologue it is not obvious where it belongs taxonomically. Lackey (1983) placed this variety as a synonym of  Macroptilium fraternum (Piper) Lackey. We tentatively place  var. tucumanensis as a nomenclatural synonym under  Vigna juruana . This is because the original description includes floral dimensions that best fit  Vigna juruana (e.g. a small calyx ca. 2.5 cm long). However, the original description describes the fruits as ca. 2.5 cm long and 3 mm wide, and the fruit length is too small for  V. juruana . Regarding the type locality, no herbarium specimen has been found with a collection locality in the Tucuman province that matches the protologue of  Phaseolus schottii var. tucumanensis . Moreover, no V. subg.  Lasiospron species, including  V. juruana, is reported from such a high elevation.  Vigna juruana and  V. lasiocarpa are the two V. subg.  Lasiospron species with the widest elevational ranges (Fig. 4) with  V. juruana occurring up to 1028 m and  V. lasiocarpa up to 1731 m. The Tucuman collection locality and the reported altitude of 2500 m for  var. tucumanensis are both exceptional for the subgenus (Figs. 3–4).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F35E5093DEBFA6DBBFEFC20	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
03FA87F36F30E5083DFCFBCDBB2DFD7B.text	03FA87F36F30E5083DFCFBCDBB2DFD7B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna diffusa (Scott Elliot) A. Delgado & Verdc.	<div><p>2.  VIGNA DIFFUSA (Scott Elliot) A. Delgado &amp; Verdc., American Journal of Botany 98(10): 1711 (2011).</p><p>Phaseolus diffusus Scott Elliot, J. Linn. Soc. 29: 12 (1891).</p><p>TYPE:   MADAGASCAR.  sandy dunes near Fort Dauphin, Sep 1890, G.F. Scott Elliot 2366 (lectotype: K!, designated by Du Puy et al. 2002 ;  isolectotypes: BM!,  P!).</p><p>Phaseolus ovatus sensu Benth. Comm. Legum. Gen.: 77 (1837) in Brazil, pro parte.</p><p>Vigna longifolia sensu Du Puy et al. (2002), non (Benth.) Verdc.</p><p>Perennial prostrate or climbing vines, foliage and reproductive parts covered with long yellow hairs, with minute glandular hairs intermingled, sparsely or densely pilose. Stems herbaceous, fibrous, often with adventitious roots, sparsely to densely pilose with yellow, straight hairs. Leaves trifoliolate, stipules lanceolate to sagittate, upper extension 4–12 mm long, 2–4 mm wide, membranaceous to chartaceous, 8- to 10-veined, lower portion biauriculate, 1–2 mm long, stipels ovate-lanceolate, shorter than petiolules, ca. 2 mm long, covered with long straight and minute glandular hairs; petioles 2–6 cm long, covered with hirsute, retrorse hairs, rachis considerably shorter, 5–10 mm long, with antrorsely appressed hairs, canaliculate; leaflets entire, ovate, elliptic-ovate, or oblong, usually obtuse or acute at apex, often with raised veins below and the veins outlined in light green relative to the darker green lamina, chartaceous, densely strigose to softly pilose on both surfaces; terminal leaflet 4–6.5 ˟ 2–2.5 cm, lateral leaflets 3–6 ˟ 2–3 cm. Inflorescences 7–13.5 cm long, peduncles up to 13 cm long, covered with straight, retrorse hairs, densely strigose distally, rachis ca. 5 mm long, with 2–3 swollen, ampulliform nodes, ca. 1.5 mm long, with 3–5 vestured orifices, alternately distributed, flowers clustered distally; primary bracts caducous, secondary bracts lanceolate, ca. 10 mm long, caducous; bracteoles mostly persistent at anthesis, lanceolate, 6–10 mm long; pedicels shorter than calyx tube, 3–5 mm long, longer and twisting in fruit, covered with retrorse, straight hairs, antrorse at base of calyx; calyx campanulate, sparsely pilose at base, tube longer than teeth, ca. 3 ˟ ca. 3 mm, upper teeth emarginate, rounded at apex, not forming a lip, lateral teeth and lower tooth oblong and rounded, ca. 1 mm long. Flowers golden yellow, 1.5–2 cm long, standard petal asymmetric, broadly ovate, ca. 1.5 ˟ ca. 1.5 cm, bilobed at apex, two parallel, thick callosities on the lamina above the point of folding, two fleshy auricles, 1 mm wide, above a short claw; wing petals longer than keel, with an obovate lamina, 1.5–1.7 ˟ ca. 1.5 cm, with a prominent auricle at base, claw ca. 3 mm long; keel distinctly beaked, curved through 270, almost forming a complete coil, ca. 1.5 cm above the wing, with transverse pockets above the petal claws, claws ca. 4 mm long, fused to staminal tube; androecium 2 cm long, vexillary stamen with a basal appendage; anthers oblong-ovate, ca. 1 mm long, basifixed to sub-basifixed to their filaments; pollen grains triporate, with a coarsely reticulate exine, interstitium granular; ovary straight, with a basal nectary disc ca. 1 mm long, ovules 10–11 per ovary, style with a tenuous lower part, upper part thickened, cylindrical, curved, pollen brush 4–5 mm long, with long spreading hairs produced beyond the stigma to form a short conical appendage; stigma transversally-ovate, laterally placed. Fruit patent, linear-oblong, flattened, truncate at the apex, valves thin-walled, turning dark brown or black at maturity, densely pilose with yellow hairs, 4.5–6 cm long, ca. 7 mm wide, beak 1 mm long, elastically dehiscent. Seeds (immature) D-shaped, ca. 3 ˟ ca. 4 mm, surface smooth, testa brown, hilum oblong, ca. 2 mm long, covered by an epihilum, rim-aril raised, aril when present poorly developed, membranaceous and whitish. Chromosome number: 2 n = 22 (Senff et al. 1992, 1995; Schifino-Wittmann 2000).</p><p>Illustrations — Herter (1952) as  Phaseolus ovatus; Isaguirre and Beyhaut (1997) as  Vigna longifolia; Cordazzo and Seeliger (1995) as  Vigna luteola; Snak, Miotto and Goldenberg (2011) as  Vigna longifolia .</p><p>Distribution and Habitat —  Vigna diffusa occurs in southern Brazilian restinga, a coastal low forest or scrub vegetation on sand, along the coast of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, and S ~ ao Paulo, south to Uruguay (Fig. 3). According to herbarium labels,  Vigna diffusa was first collected in the nineteenth century on the eastern coast of Madagascar. Three specimens of this species from Madagascar have been found in herbaria, and 1964 was the last time the species was collected on the island. The occurrence in Madagascar is just as likely the result of natural trans-Atlantic dispersal as human introduction because  Vigna diffusa occurs on coastal sand dunes, flooded or moist environments, and in grasslands and Restinga communities all at sea level. Flowering and fruiting have been registered in most months except June, and August to November.</p><p>Etymology —The species name refers to the spreading habit of the species ( diffusus, spreading).</p><p>Vernacular Name —“Feij ~ ao-da-praia” (Cordazzo and Seeliger 1995).</p><p>Representative Specimens Examined —See Appendix 1 for complete list. Brazil. — PARANÁ: Paranagua, Ilha do Mel, 30 Dec 2009, C. Snak et al. 269 (UPCB). Uruguay. — CANELONES: bords de Santa Lucıa, Mar 1867, E. Gilbert 311 (K, W). Madagascar. Sandy dunes near Fort Dauphin, Sep 1890, G. F. Scott Elliot 3023 (BM, K).</p><p>Notes —A new combination is here proposed for the name  Phaseolus diffusus . Specimens of this species collected by Tweedie s.n. (K) and St. Hilaire s.n. (P) in southern Brazil were listed by Bentham (1859) under  P. ovatus . With reference to nomenclatural and taxonomic decisions about the latter see under  V. schottii .</p><p>Vigna diffusa is morphologically similar to  V. schottii but differs from it by its biauriculate stipules and mainly ovate leaflets. The diagnostic sagittate upper portion of the stipule has a wide base and scarious texture. The ovate to elliptic-ovate (sometime oblong) leaflets are often bicolored, where the main veins are lighter green compared to the darker green leaflet lamina. In addition, although originally described as  Phaseolus diffusus from Madagascar,  V. diffusa has the most southerly and easterly distribution of any of the six species of V. subg.  Lasiospron in South America; it is most frequently encountered in coastal habitats of southern Brazil and Uruguay (Fig. 3).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F30E5083DFCFBCDBB2DFD7B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
03FA87F36F31E5163DEBFD04BB39FBAB.text	03FA87F36F31E5163DEBFD04BB39FBAB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna longifolia (Benth.) Verdc.	<div><p>3.  VIGNA LONGIFOLIA (Benth.) Verdc., in Kew Bulletin 24: 541 (1970).</p><p>Phaseolus longifolius Benth., Comm. Legum. Gen.: 75 (1837).</p><p>TYPE:   BRAZIL. “  ad Brasilia ”, Schott s.n. (holotype: W!)  . Figure 8.</p><p>Phaseolus schottii var. longifolius f. intermedius Hassl., Candollea 1: 463. 1923. TYPE: PARAGUAY. Chaco. Hassler 2769 (G, not seen); J€ orgensen 2959 (lectotype: G!, designated here; MO!, US! =  V. longifolia) synon. nov. Syntypes Rojas 2917 (SI! =  V. longifolia). ARGENTINA. J€ orgensen 2951 (SI! =  V. longifolia).</p><p>Phaseolus schottii var. longifolius f. grandiflorus Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923. TYPE: PARAGUAY. “in Paraguaria septentrionales”, 1901–1902, E. Hassler 7320 (lectotype: G!, designated here; isolectotypes: BM!, F!, G!, GH!, MO!, NY!), synon. nov.</p><p>Perennial or annual (?), scrambling or climbing vines up to 3 m, with foliage and reproductive parts covered with minute glandular hairs, and a sparse or dense pubescence. Stems rhizomatous, hollow, slightly woody at base, often with adventitious roots, sparsely strigose, with yellow, retrorse hairs less than 1 mm long. Leaves with stipules narrowly-lanceolate, unequally bilobed, upper portion 4–6 ˟ 1–2 mm, 5–6-veined, not reflexed, persistent; lower portion ca. 2 mm long, sparsely pilose; stipels oblong or triangular, 1.5–2 mm long, subequal in length to petiolules, glabrous except for minute glandular trichomes; petioles 4–10 cm long, covered with retrorse hairs, rachis considerably shorter, 5–20 mm long, with some antrorsely appressed hairs on the adaxial side, canaliculate; leaflets entire, ovate to narrowly ovate or lanceolate, acute or acuminate at apex, often with raised veins below, membranaceous to chartaceous, sparsely to densely strigose, terminal leaflet 9–15 ˟ 1.3–5.5 cm, lateral leaflets 7–11 ˟ 2–5.5 cm. Inflorescences up to 35 cm long, peduncles 14–32 cm long, covered with short retrorse hairs, densely strigose distally; rachis 1.5–3 cm long, with 2–4 swollen ovoid nodes, these 2–4 mm long, with 4–6 alternate orifices, flowers clustered distally; primary bracts, caducous, secondary bracts ca. 6 mm long, caducous; bracteoles mostly persistent at anthesis, 6–10 mm long, longer than calyx tube; pedicels shorter than calyx tube, longer and twisting in fruit, covered distally with retrorse, straight hairs; calyx campanulate, sparsely strigose at the base, glabrous distally, 4–5 ˟ 2–3 mm, upper teeth slightly divided, narrow and acute, not forming a lip, other teeth triangular, subequal, 1.5–2 mm long, lower tooth slightly longer than lateral teeth. Flowers golden yellow, ca. 2.5 cm long, standard petal asymmetric, broadly ovate, ca. 2 ˟ ca. 2.5 cm, bilobed at apex, with two parallel, thick callosities on the lamina above the point of folding, and two fleshy auricles above a short claw; wing petals longer than keel, with an obovate lamina, ca. 2.5 ˟ ca. 1.5 cm, with an auricle at base, claw ca. 3 mm long; keel distinctly beaked, coiled ca. 360, almost forming a complete circle, ca. 1.5 cm above the wing, with transverse pockets above the claws, claws ca. 4 mm long, fused to staminal tube; androecium ca. 3.5 cm long, staminal tube ca. 2.5 cm long, vexillary stamen with a basal appendage; anthers oblong-ovate, ca. 1 mm long, basifixed to sub-basifixed to filaments; pollen grains triporate, with a coarsely reticulate exine; ovary straight, with a basal nectary disc ca. 1 mm long, ovules 12–14, style with a tenuous lower part, upper part thickened and cylindrical, curved, pollen brush ca. 8 mm long, with long spreading hairs, produced beyond the stigma to form a short hook; stigma transversally-ovate, laterally placed, surrounded by short cilia. Fruit patent, oblong to slightly falcate, sub-cylindrical, valves thick-walled, not constricted between the seeds, turning dark brown or black at maturity, (4–) 6–8 cm long, 5–6 mm wide, elastically dehiscent, densely strigose, with yellow and white, straight hairs, beak straight, 5–7 mm long. Seeds globose to D- shaped, ca. 3 ˟ ca. 4 mm, surface smooth, testa light brown, mottled darker brown, hilum oblong, as long as seed width, rim-aril prominent, covered by an epihilum, aril consistently present, hippocrepiform, cartilaginous with white-banded crenate margins, mostly surrounding the hilum. Chromosome number: 2 n = 22 (Mercado-Ruaro and Delgado-Salinas 1996). Figure 8.</p><p>Distribution and Habitat —Southern Mexico (Campeche, Chiapas, Tabasco, Veracruz), Central America (Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama) and in South America, Amazon River basin, and Amazonian savannas, Restinga Atlantic Forest and in the Paraguay-Parana fluvial system (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Venezuela). Although widely distributed, this species has not to our knowledge been collected in Guyana, French Guiana, and Suriname.  Vigna longifolia, as well as  V. lasiocarpa, have been collected in the Pacific lowlands of Ecuador (Guayas Province), the most western location for species of V. subg.  Lasiospron in South America. This species also has one of the most southern occurrences of a V. subg.  Lasiospron species in northeastern Argentina (Fig. 3).  Vigna longifolia generally inhabits seasonal or permanently flooded plains or savannah-type grasslands, and is sometimes reported sprawling on floating vegetation. It also grows in old rice fields; altitudinal range from 0– 600 m. Flowering and fruiting throughout the year.</p><p>Etymology —The species epithet  longifolia refers to the long, narrow leaflets.</p><p>Vernacular Names —“Baul ch’ o” (E. Ucan 1607); “feij ~ ao bravo” ( Melo 3352); “Siratro de Agua” (Lock 83/66).</p><p>Uses —The species is relished by livestock, and its seeds are eaten by birds (Pott and Pott 1994).</p><p>Representative Specimens Examined —See Appendix 1 for complete list. Argentina. — CHACO PROVINCE: Colonia Benıtez, without date, A. G. Schulz 10328 (G). Bolivia. — EL BENI: Trinidad, Jan 1965, O. Braun 11 (US). Brazil. — AMAZONAS: Alenquer, Margem do Rio Amazonas, 30 May 2014, C. Snak et al. 1216 (HUEFS). Colombia. — AMAZONAS: Rıo Lontoyacu, 2 Oct 1946, R. E. Schultes 46–173 (US). Costa Rica. Guanacaste Province, Canton Bagaces P.N. Palo Verde, valle de Tempique, Sector Catalina, La Espuela y el area administrativa de Palo Verde, 10 21'0 '' N, 85 21'0 '' W, 10 m, 22 Sep 1994, U. Chavarrıa 1047 (K). Ecuador. — GUAYAS: Estacion Psicıcola Santa Priscila, Est. 3, 2 23 ' 0”N, 79 46 ' W, 5 m, 20 May 2000, X. Cornejo and C. Bonifaz 7049 K). El Salvador. — AHUACHAPÁN: A.P. Santa Rita, ruta 7, La Laguna, 13 48 ' 0 '' N, 90 4 ' 0 '' W, 20 m, 12 Apr 2004, J. M. Rosales 2365 (MEXU). Guatemala. Depto. Jutiapa, potreros between Trapiche Vargas and Asuncion Mita, 500–600 m, 15 Nov 1939, J. A. Steyermark 31881 (F). Mexico. — CAMPECHE: Hopelchen District, a 2.2 km al ENE de Chun-Ek, 19 11 ' 42 '' N, 89 10 ' 25 '' W, 90 m, 26 Aug 2005, D. Alvarez 11670 (MEXU). Panama. — CANAL ZONE: vicinity of Frijoles, 3 Mar 1923, C. V. Piper 5164 (US). Paraguay. — CHACO: campos bajos estero Estancia Loma Para, Apr 1917, T. Rojas 2917 (SI). Peru. — LORETO: Lower Rıo Nanay, May-Jun 1929, Ll. Williams 555 (US). Venezuela. — APURE: Payarita, entre San Fernando y Achaguas, Bajo Apure, 12 Aug 1972, M. Ramia 4852 (VEN).</p><p>Notes — Bentham (1859) considered  Phaseolus longifolius and  P. schottii as conspecific, placing the latter as a synonym of the former. As mentioned above, Hassler (1923) recognised  P. schottii published earlier in Bentham’ s (1837) treatment, and he published four varieties,  P. schottii var genuinus,  P. schottii var. campestris,  P. schottii var. longifolia, and  P. schottii var. tucumanensis . In our treatment, the typical variety is discussed under  Vigna schottii, and varieties  campestris and tucumanensis under  V. juruana .</p><p>In more recent classifications (Verdcourt 1970; Marechal et al. 1978),  Vigna longifolia included three of the six species here considered as part of V. subg.  Lasiospron . The species  V. diffusa,  V. schottii and for some time even  V. trichocarpa were considered as synonyms of this distinctive species.  Vigna longifolia is distinguished from the other V. subg.  Lasiospron species by a combination of features, including its bi-auriculate stipules with a long, narrowly triangular upper portion, up to 6 mm long, and lanceolate leaflets, up to 15 cm long. Its flowers are approximately 2 cm long, with a conspicuous hooked style tip. The long-tapering pods with thick-walled valves have seeds each with a conspicuous white aril. Seeds with cartilaginous white arils are also consistently present in  V. lasiocarpa .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F31E5163DEBFD04BB39FBAB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
03FA87F36F2FE5153DEBFB57BE7EFA10.text	03FA87F36F2FE5153DEBFB57BE7EFA10.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna lasiocarpa (Benth.) Verdc.	<div><p>4.  VIGNA LASIOCARPA (Mart. ex Benth.) Verdc., in Kew Bulletin 24: 539 (1970).</p><p>Phaseolus lasiocarpus Mart. ex Benth., Comm. Legum. Gen.: 76 (1837).</p><p>TYPE:   BRAZIL. “  ad Ega Amazonum ”,  Martius s.n. (lectotype: M!, designated here ;  isolectotype: M!).</p><p>P. pilosus Kunth var. lasiocarpus (Mart. ex Benth.) Hassl., Candollea 1: 465 (1923). See nomenclatural notes below.</p><p>Phaseolus pilosus Kunth,  Nov. Gen. Sp. 6: 453 (1823). TYPE: [COLOMBIA]. “crescit in arenosis fluminis Magdalenae, prope Morales”, Humboldt &amp; Bonpland 1542 (holotype: P!; isotype: B–W!, annotated as  P. hirtus).</p><p>P. pilosus Kunth var. genuinus Hassl., Candollea 1: 465 (1923).</p><p>Phaseolus hirsutus Mart. ex Benth., Comm. Legum. Gen.: 76 (1837). TYPE: BRAZIL. “in campis provinciae Rio Negro”, Martius s. n. [2729] (lectotype: M!, designated here).</p><p>Phaseolus balansae Micheli, Mem. Soc. Phys. Hist. Nat. Geneve 28(7): 29, Contr. Flor. Paraguay 1:29. Figure 8 (1883). TYPE: PARAGUAY. “cosme inter Villa Rica et Caaguazu, in pratis, Mart.”, M. Balansa 1549 (holotype: G; isotypes: P-2!).</p><p>P. lasiocarpus var. balansae (M. Micheli) Chod. &amp; Hassl., in Bull. Herb. Boiss. 2: 909 (1904).</p><p>Phaseolus lasiocarpus var. igatimianus Chod. &amp; Hassl., in Bull. Herb. Boiss. 2: 909 (1904). TYPE: PARAGUAY. [Canindeyu Department], “iter ad Yerbales montimun Sierra de Maracayu, in regione vicini  Igatimı ”, Nov 1885, E. Hassler 5535 (holotype: G, not seen; isotypes: BM!, F!, MO!, NY!, P!, W!).</p><p>Phaseolus diversifolius Pittier, Bol. Tecn. Minist. Agric. 5: 56 (1944). TYPE: VENEZUELA. Anzoategui, sabanas de Guaraguara, cerca de Santame, H. Pittier 14302 (holotype: not traced), non  P. diversifolius Pers., Syn. Pl. 2(2): 296 (1807).</p><p>Perennial scrambling or climbing vine up to 5 m or more, foliage and reproductive parts covered with long yellow (rarely brown) hairs, and minute glandular hairs intermingled, pubescent or glabrescent. Stems herbaceous, fibrous (sturdy), older stems woody, with nitrogen fixing nodules, often with adventitious roots with nodules, sparsely to densely pilose with yellowish-fulvous, straight hairs. Leaves with stipules ovate-lanceolate, often apiculate, unequally bilobed, upper portion 4–7 ˟ 1–2 mm wide, obscurely veined; lower portion ca. 2 mm long, sometimes adnate to the stem, densely strigose; stipels oblong to triangular, 1–2 mm long, shorter than petiolules, 2-veined, covered with minute glandular trichomes; petioles 4–6 cm long, covered with hirsute, retrorse hairs, rachis considerably shorter, 5–10 mm long, with antrorsely appressed hairs, canaliculate; leaflets entire or lobed, with sinuous margins, oblong to ovate or widely ovate, sometimes rhombic or linear-lanceolate, usually obtuse or acute or even acuminate at apex, often with raised veins below, chartaceous, densely strigose to softly pilose on both surfaces, usually more densely so beneath; terminal leaflet 4–11.5 ˟ 2.5–5 cm, lateral leaflets 3–9.5 ˟ 2–4.5 cm. Inflorescences 10–50 cm long, peduncles up to 45 cm long, covered with straight, retrorse hairs, densely strigose distally; rachis 3–5 cm long, with (3–)5–8(–9) swollen nodes, these oblong, 2–4 mm long, with ca. 10 secretory orifices in two parallel rows, flowers clustered distally; primary bracts caducous, secondary bracts lanceolate, 8–10 mm long, caducous; bracteoles mostly persistent at anthesis, lanceolate, 6–15 mm long; pedicels shorter than calyx tube, 3–5 mm long, longer and twisting in fruit, covered with retrorse, straight hairs, antrorse at base of calyx; calyx campanulate, densely hirsute-strigose, tube longer than teeth, 5.5–10 ˟ 3.5–8 mm, upper teeth deeply divided and broadly rounded at apex forming a lip; 5–6 ˟ 5–6 mm, sinuses 3 mm, lower lip with lateral teeth oblong and rounded, 5–6 ˟ 2–3 mm, and with the middle lower tooth 4–5 ˟ 2 mm. Flowers golden yellow, (1.8–) 2.5–3.5 cm long, standard petal asymmetric, broadly ovate, 2.5–3 ˟ 2.7–3 cm, bilobed at apex, two parallel, thick callosities on the lamina above the point of folding, and two fleshy auricles above a short claw; wing petals longer than keel, with an obovate lamina, 2.5–3.5 ˟ ca. 1.5 cm, with a prominent auricle at base, ca. 2 mm long, claw ca. 4 mm long; keel distinctly beaked, curved through 360, forming a complete coil, ca. 3 cm above the wing, with transverse pockets above the claws, claws 4–5 mm long, fused to staminal tube; androecium 3.5–4 cm long, staminal tube ca. 3 cm long, vexillary stamen with a basal appendage; anthers oblong-ovate, ca. 1 mm long, basifixed to sub-basifixed to filaments; pollen grains triporate, with a coarsely reticulate exine, interstitium granular; ovary straight, with a basal nectary disk ca. 1 mm long, ovules 16–18, style with a tenuous lower part, upper portion thickened, cylindrical, curved, pollen brush 7–10 mm long, with long spreading hairs, produced beyond the stigma to form a short hook; stigma transversally-ovate, laterally placed. Fruit patent or rarely ascending, linear-oblong, cylindrical, truncate at the apex, valves coriaceous to woody, turning dark brown or black at maturity, densely pilose with a mixture of white and yellow hairs becoming more brownish at the sutures and base, 6–9 cm long, 7–11 mm wide, elastically dehiscent, beak 2–3 mm long, seeds arranged obliquely. Seeds oblong, subglobose, 3–4 ˟ 3–4 mm, surface smooth, testa brown, hilum oblong, ca. 2 mm long, covered by an epihilum, rim-aril raised, with a white, excentric hippocrepiform aril consistently present towards the lens. Chromosome number: 2 n = 20 (Marechal 1969, as  P. pilosus Kunth; Mercado-Ruaro and Delgado-Salinas 1996).</p><p>Illustrations and Photographs — Bentham (1859) as  Phaseolus lasiocarpus, or in http://floraBrasiliensis.cria.org.br; Micheli (1883) as  Phaseolus balansae; Pittier (1944) as  Phaseolus lasiocarpus; Lackey and D’ Arcy (1980) as  Vigna lasiocarpa; Lewis and Owen (1989) photographs of flower and fruit, as  V. lasiocarpa; Pott and Pott (2000) photograph of  V. lasiocarpa .</p><p>Distribution and Habitat —The species occurs in southern Mexico (Campeche, Chiapas, Oaxaca, Tabasco, Veracruz, and Yucatan); Central America (Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama); South America (Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, French Guiana, Suriname, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay, and Argentina) and in the Dominican Republic (Fig. 3). Mainly in seasonal or permanently flooded plains or savannas or swampy grasslands, reported growing in sugar plantation ditches and on bank edges of rice fields; mostly from sea level to ca. 600 m, but ascending in Mexico and Colombia to 1200 m. In South America, in the Solim ~ oes and Amazon River basins, and in the Paraguay-Parana fluvial system. An ecological study of aquatic macrophyte diversity in the Pantanal Matogrossense National Park found  Vigna lasiocarpa to be one of the most frequent species and distributed among ca. 60% of the 17 sampling sites (Pott et al. 2011). Flowering and fruiting occur throughout the year.</p><p>Vernacular Names —“Frijolillo” (H.  Vibrans 8246), “Feij ~ aozinho-do-brejo” (Pott and Pott 2000).</p><p>Etymology —The species epithet alludes to the hairiness of the fruits (Lasio woolly or hairy and  Carpus fruit).</p><p>Uses —The species is relished by livestock, and its seeds are eaten by birds (Pott and Pott 2000).</p><p>Representative Specimens Examined — See Appendix 1 for complete list. Argentina. — Corrientes: Depto. Santo Tome, Estancia Garruchos, 14 Feb 1960, T. M. Pedersen 5446 (RBGE, US). Belize. — STANN CREEK DISTRICT: Carib Switch, Stann Creek-Middlesex Road, 13 Jan 1953, P. H. Gentle 7839 (MEXU). Bolivia. — EL BENI: Trinidad, 236 m, O. Braun 75 (US). Brazil. — ACRE: Rio Branco, Amazonia,  
Baixo 
Rio Branco, 1 Jan 1948, R. de Lemos Froes 23013 (NY). Colombia. — CAUCA: east of  Aganche, 1200–1500 m, 14 Jul 1922, F. W.  Pennell 8328 (NY). Costa Rica. — ALAJUELA:  Alfaro Ruiz, entre Tapezco de Arriba y Tapezco de Abajo, 1900 m, 12 Nov 1964, A. Jimenez M. 1145 (NY). Dominican Republic. — SAN CRISTÓBAL:  Station Hatillo, 1 Nov 1977, A. H. Liogier 9073 (NY). Ecuador. — GUAYAS:  Milagro, 50 m, 30 Jun 1923, A. S. Hitchcock 20275 (NY US). El Salvador. — AHUACHAPÁN: A.P. Santa Rita, ruta 7,  La Laguna, 13 48 ' 0 '' N, 90 4 ' 0 '' W, 20 m, 12 Apr 2004, J. M. Rosales 2355 (MEXU). Guyana.  Demerara-Mahaica Region, east coast  Demerara,  Cane Grove Conservancy,  Flagstaff, 6 37 ' 60”N, 57 55 ' 60 '' E, 19 Feb 1989, L. J. Gillespie 706 (US). Honduras. — CORTÉS: en bananales de La Lima, 60 m, Jun 1977, R. H. Stover 4 (MEXU). Mexico. — CAMPECHE: Municipio Champoton, Aguada Paraıso, 18 55 ' 60 '' N, 90 21 ' 0 '' W, 12 m, 15 Oct 1981, C. Chan 887 (XAL). Nicaragua. — MANAGUA:  Banco de Germoplasma, Hacienda Experimental de la Universidad Centroamericana, 15 Nov 1984, D. Soza 247 (MO). Panama. — CHIRIQUÍ: vicinity of San Felix,  eastern Chiriquı, 1 Jan 1912, H. Pittier 5225 (US). Paraguay. — ALTO PARANÁ: in regione fluminis Alto Parana, 1 Oct 1909, K. Fiebrig 6177 (BM, SI, US). Peru. — LORETO: Mishuyacu, near Iquitos, 100 m, 1 Feb 1930, C. Klug 1022 (NY, US). Suriname. — DISTRICT NICKERIE: Nickerie, 28 Jun 1951, A. T. Semple 358 (US). Venezuela. — AMAZONAS: at  Cerro Yavita,  Rıo Atabapo,  Rıo Orinoco; 19 Oct 1950, B. Maguire 29294A (NY).</p><p>Notes — Verdcourt (1970) designated  Vigna lasiocarpa as the type species of V. sect.  Lasiospron and, in addition, gave reasons for selecting the species  Phaseolus lasiocarpus opposed to  P. pilosus or  P. hirsutus . Unfortunately, no lectotype was designated at that time between the two cited syntypes under  P. lasiocarpus . Both syntypes were studied by us, and the  Martius collection at M has been designated as lectotype. Regarding the original material of  P. hirsutus at M, all syntypes were found except the one of Poeppig. The lectotype here designated is the  Martius specimen from Rio Negro, which bears a description of this species in Martius’ handwriting. Recently, Cremers and Hoft (1998), following Grisebach (1860), listed  Dolichos jacquinii DC. (De Candolle 1825) in synonymy under  V. lasiocarpa; however, no new combination was proposed by those authors. De Candolle published  Dolichos jacquinii for a plant described by Jacquin (1788) from the Caribbean jungles under the epithet  D. lignosus L. (Linnaeus 1753). No type specimen of the binomial has been found at G-DC or at BM-Banks herbarium, and only the species description can be used to interpret the name. Jacquin described a plant with white flowers on peduncles shorter than the leaves, and long straight pods with 18 seeds. Although  Vigna lasiocarpa sometimes has pods containing 18 seeds, its inflorescences always exceed the length of the leaves and the species never has been reported to have white flowers. Thus, from its description  Dolichos jacquinii is not identifiable as  V. lasiocarpa, and the decision here is to exclude this name.</p><p>Phaseolus diversifolius Pittier was proposed as a synonym of  V. lasiocarpa by Aymard (1999). We have not seen Pittier’ s plant and, thus, cannot comment upon its identity. The protologue of  Phaseolus diversifolius is not in Latin and the name has been shown to be a later homonym of  P. diversifolius Pers. (Persoon 1807) . Therefore, in accordance with Article 53 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Turland et al. 2018), this species was not validly published, and the name is unavailable for use.</p><p>Vigna lasiocarpa is the most vigorous and conspicuous of all the species of V. subg.  Lasiospron . It is most similar in overall morphology to its sister species  V. longifolia .  Vigna lasiocarpa differs from  V. longifolia in being more often pubescent (especially on the leaves), having longer and wider calyces with the upper teeth more deeply divided and broadly rounded at the apex to form a lip, and having longer and thicker fruits. Both species have distinctive arillate seeds.  Vigna lasiocarpa is the only species in the subgenus, up to now, that has been reported as a dysploid.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F2FE5153DEBFB57BE7EFA10	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
03FA87F36F2CE5123E4BFA1DB8A2F9A0.text	03FA87F36F2CE5123E4BFA1DB8A2F9A0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna trichocarpa (C. Wright) A. Delgado, Monogr. Syst. Bot.	<div><p>5.  VIGNA TRICHOCARPA (C. Wright) A. Delgado, Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 45: 1254 (1993).</p><p>Phaseolus trichocarpus C. Wright, in F. A. Sauvalle, An. Acad. Ci. Habana, Rev. Ci. 5: 337 (1869) and in Fl. Cuba: 30 (1873).</p><p>TYPE:   CUBA. [Pinar del Rıo Province], “  en la orilla de las lagunas dentro del agua. Vuelta Abajo ”, no date, C. Wright s.n. (holotype: GH! ;  isotypes: BM!, G-2!, K-3!,  MO!,  NY- 3!,  P!,  US!,  WU!). (See notes). Figure 9.</p><p>Phaseolus ovatus Benth. var. glabratus Benth., in Mart. Flora Brazil. 15(1): 188 (1859). TYPE: BRAZIL. “prope Bahiam, in humidis cum forma pilosa”, W. D. Salzmann s.n. (holotype: M, not seen; isotypes: K!, MO!, RBGE!). non sensu Chodat &amp; Hassler, Bull. Herb. Boiss. Ser. 2, 4: 909. (1904).</p><p>Phaseolus schottii var. campestris forma transiens Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923. TYPE: BRAZIL. Bahia in pratis humedis, W. D. Salzmann s.n. (holotype: G-DEL, not seen; isotypes: K!, MO!, RBGE!), synon. nov. (See notes).</p><p>Phaseolus lanceolatus 
Bello, Anales Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 10: 262 (1881). TYPE: PUERTO RICO.  Without locality, Bello s.n. (holotype: B, destroyed). Neotype designated by Santiago-Valentın et al. Taxon 64: 333, 2015: Puerto Rico, Pueblo Viejo, 19 July 1914, J.A. Stevenson 2097 [NY, barcode 01007063].</p><p>Phaseolus schottii var. campestris forma guyanensis Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923. TYPE: FRENCH GUIANA. Without locality, Poiteau s.n. (G, not seen) synon. nov. (See notes).</p><p>Phaseolus productus Ducke, Arch. Jard. Bot. Rıo de Janeiro 4: 99 (1925). TYPE: [BRAZIL. Para State], “in campis inundatis Jutahy inter Almeirim et Prainha inter frutices ad ripam fluminis”, 16 Apr 1923, Ducke s.n. (lectotype: RB!, No. 17.285, designated here).</p><p>Vigna paludosa Milne-Redh., Kew Bulletin 2: 27 (1947). TYPE: SIERRA LEONE. Rokupr, common among grass in swamps, 29 Jan 1935, Deighton 2953 (holotype: K!).</p><p>Perennials or annuals (?), scrambling or climbing vines up to 3 m, with foliage and reproductive parts covered with minute glandular hairs, and sparse or dense pubescence. Stems hollow, slightly woody at base, often with adventitious roots, sparsely to densely strigose, with yellow, retrorse hairs. Leaves with stipules ovate to narrowly-lanceolate, spurred, upper portion 8–12 ˟ 1–2 mm, 5–6-veined, not reflexed, persistent; lower portion 3–4 mm long, sparsely pilose; stipels oblong or triangular, ca. 1.5 mm long, subequal in length to petiolules, glabrous except for minute glandular trichomes; petioles 3.5–8 cm long, covered with retrorse hairs, rachis considerably shorter, ca. 1 cm long, with some antrorsely appressed hairs on the adaxial side, canaliculate; leaflets entire, ovate, narrowly ovate, to lanceolate, acute or acuminate at apex, with raised veins below, membranaceous; sparsely to densely strigose, terminal leaflet 3.5–11 ˟ 1.5–3 cm, lateral leaflets 7–9 ˟ 2–3.5 cm. Inflorescences up to 22 cm long, peduncles 16–20 cm long, covered with short retrorse hairs, densely strigose distally; rachis 1.5–2 cm long, with 1–4(–5) nodes, the nodes oblong, spatuliform, 2–3 mm long, orifice distribution scalariform, with transverse separations, flowers clustered distally; primary bracts, caducous, secondary bracts ca. 6 mm long, caducous; bracteoles mostly persistent at anthesis, 5–8 mm long, longer than calyx tube; pedicels shorter than calyx tube, 1–2 mm long, longer and twisting in fruit, covered distally with retrorse, straight hairs; c alyx campanulate, sparsely strigose at the base, glabrous distally, 1.5–2 ˟ ca. 2 mm, upper teeth slightly divided, narrow and acute, not forming a lip, teeth triangular, subequal, 0.5 mm long, lower tooth slightly longer than lateral teeth. Flowers golden yellow, 8–12 mm long, standard petal asymmetric, broadly ovate, ca. 10 ˟ ca. 10 mm, bilobed at apex, with two parallel callosities on the lamina above the point of folding, and two fleshy auricles above a short claw; wing petals longer than keel, with an obovate lamina, ca. 1.2 cm long, 5–6 mm wide, with an auricle at base, claw ca. 1.5 mm long; keel distinctly beaked, coiled through ca. 360, almost forming a complete circle; ca. 7 mm above the wing, with transverse pockets above claws, the claws ca. 2 mm long, fused to the staminal tube; androecium ca. 1.5 cm long, vexillary stamen with a basal appendage; anthers oblong-ovate, ca. 1 mm long, basifixed to sub-basifixed to filaments; pollen grains triporate, with a coarsely reticulate exine; ovary straight, with a basal nectary disc ca. 0.5 mm long, ovules 7–8 per ovary, style with a tenuous lower part, upper portion thickened, cylindrical, curved, pollen brush 2–3 mm long, with long spreading hairs, produced beyond the stigma to form a conical appendage; stigma transversally-ovate, sub-apically placed. Fruit ascending, oblong, flattened, valves thin-walled, not constricted between the seeds, turning dark brown or black at maturity, sparsely strigose, with yellow, straight hairs, (3–) 3.5–4 cm long, 6–7(–8) mm wide, beak 2 mm long, straight, elastically dehiscent. Seeds D- shaped, 2–3.5 ˟ 3–4 mm, surface smooth, testa light to dark brown, hilum oblong, as long as seed width, rim-aril distinctly raised, covered by an epihilum, lacking a cartilaginous aril. Seedlings with hypogeal germination, eophylls without stipules. Figure 9.</p><p>Illustrations — Berhaut (1976) as  Vigna paludosa Milne-Redh. Maxted et al. (2004) and Acevedo-Rodrıguez (2003) as  Vigna longifolia .</p><p>Distribution and Habitat —Southern Mexico to Brazil, including the Greater Antilles, and likely native in west Africa (Fig. 3). In general, in seasonal or permanently flooded plains or marshy environments, sometimes reported in coastal vegetation and sprawling in floating plant islands in rivers and lakes of South America, or growing in old rice fields; altitude 0 to 300 m. Flowering and fruiting have been recorded throughout the year, except in June. In South America, in the Solim oes ~ and Amazon River basins and northern Restinga Atlantic Forest and in the Paraguay-Parana fluvial system and the southern Restinga Atlantic Forest.</p><p>Etymology —The specific epithet refers to the plant’ s hairy fruits (Trichos hairs and Carpos fruit).</p><p>Vernacular Names —“Feij ~ aozinho amarelo” (Brazil). “Habichuela cimarrona” (Puerto Rico).</p><p>Representative Specimens Examined — See Appendix 1 for complete list. Belize. — STANN CREEK DISTRICT: ca. one mile, WSW of Hopkins, 17 Apr 1976, G. R. Proctor 35795 (IJ, MO). Bolivia. — SANTA CRUZ: Velasco Province, Reserva Ecologica El Refugio, 14 45 ' 47 '' S, 61 52 ' 51 '' W, 100 m, 15 Oct 1994, T. J. Killeen 6839 (MEXU). Brazil. — AMAZONAS: District Careiro, Lago Redondo, 3 Jan 1964, G. Marlier 14375 (US). Colombia. — CHOCÓ:  Rıo Atrato, 2–5 hr below  Rıo Sucio, above Loma Teguerre, 16 May 1967, J. A. Duke 10988 (MO, NY). Costa Rica. — CARTAGO:  Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agrıcolas, 609 m, 1 Feb 1959, A. T. Semple 1 (US). Dominican Republic. — SAMANÁ:  Sanchez District, seccion La Majagua, Yaqueson (Jackson), entre cano ~ La Bestia y cano ~ Punta Arena, 19 16 ' 0 '' N, 69 31 ' 60 '' W, 30 Mar 1996, B. Peguero 134 (MEXU). French Guiana. 10 km west of  Mana,  Savane de Criques Jacques, near  St. Laurent, 19 Dec 1954, R. S. Cowan 38884 (NY, US); St. Laurent do Maroni, 24 Feb 1914, R. Benoist 75 (P). Guatemala. — PETÉN: Lake Zotz, 18 May 1933, C. L. Lundell 3299 (MICH). Guyana.  Siparuni-Potaro Region, Essequibo R., near  Iwokrama Rainforest Reserve, 4 16 ' 60”N, 58 30 ' 0 '' W, 65 m, 20 Mar 1996, D. Clarke 1356 (NY). Honduras. — CORTÉS: Agua Azul tract No. B. North shore of  Lake Yojoa near the canyon, 16 Aug 1951, P. Kamb 2092 (BM). Jamaica. — SLIPE DISTRICT: without locality, 22 Jul 1973, G. R. Proctor 33461 (IJ). Mexico. — TABASCO: ejido San Ramon, campo petrolero San Ramon, 17 Jun 1996, G. Ortız 2051 (MEXU). Nicaragua. — RÍO SAN JUAN: delta of  Rıo San Juan, 23 Mar 1961, G. S. Bunting 829 (F, US). Panama. — CANAL ZONE: bridge over inlet of  Limon Bay, S of Ft. Sherman, 22 Aug 1960, J. E. Ebinger 975 (MO). Peru. — LORETO: Province Maynas, Urco-Cocha, comunidad de Vargea, 10 Aug 1998, A. Zamora U. 11 (HUT). Puerto Rico. Guaynabo, 3 Jul 1924, H. H. Whetzel 1 (BH); Pueblo Viejo, no date, J. A. Stevenson 2097 (NY). Suriname. — COMMEWIJNE DISTRICT: Charlottenburg, no date  Wullschlaegel s.n. (W). Senegal. — REGIONE DE SÉDHIOU:  Ile du Diable,  Silinki,  Sorange,  Forest de Bondie, 2 Mar 1964, R. P. Berhaut 7165 (M-2). Sierra Leone. Madina (Buya-Romende), 11 Aug 1953 H. D. Jordan 907 (K).</p><p>Notes — Howard (1988), using the sparse information available for Wright’ s collections in  Cuba, listed among nine collections of  Phaseolus, two collections named as  P. trichocarpus: C. Wright s.n., and C. Wright 2341. The latter was collected in San Mateo (Pinar del Rıo), whereas the former lacking a collection number was given no exact collection locality. Furthermore, Howard considered as the holotype the specimen at GH of Wright 2341, although Wright’ s protologue mentions a plant listed by Grisebach as  P. ovatus non Benth., “growing in the water, next to the shore of the lagoons in Vuelta Abajo.” Vuelta Abajo is also located in the Cuban province of Pinar del Rıo, and was several times visited by Wright in 1862 (21, 22 July, 4 August, 4 November). Delgado-Salinas (1993) transferred  Phaseolus trichocarpus C. Wright to  Vigna, and designated as lectotype the same collection C. Wright 2341, pointing out that the holotype might possibly be found in HAB. Numerous duplicates of C. Wright 2341 as well of C. Wright s.n. were distributed to different herbaria (BM, G-2, K-3, MO, NY-3, P, US, WU). In some herbaria (e.g. MO), both collections were mounted on the same sheet. The specimen at US even has a different collection locality: La Habana, Playa Santa Ana, with the collection year given as 1860, whereas duplicates at NY, US, and WU show 1865 as the year of collection.</p><p>Bello’ s type material of  Phaseolus lanceolatus is no longer extant at B. With no original material, Bello’ s description, particularly of the stipules and the collecting locality (Puerto Rico), leaves little doubt as to the plant’ s identity. A neotype was designated by Santiago-Valentın et al. (2015).</p><p>As mentioned earlier, we did not locate the type specimen of  P. schottii var. campestris forma guyanensis and, therefore, we have accepted Amshoff’ s (1939) taxonomic decision in placing it under  Phaseolus trichocarpus (=  Vigna trichocarpa). Regarding the  forma transiens of Hassler, Salzmann’ s collection from Bahia, Brazil “in humidis” with Bentham’ s handwriting on the specimen was designated as lectotype. It is important to mention that different collections of  Phaseolus were made by Salzmann in Bahia and those have been considered in different publications under different names: Bahia in humidis “  Phaseolus luteus, ” 1831, Salzmann s.n. (RBGE); Bahia, in collibus humidis,  Phaseolus luteus, Salzmann s.n. (MO), and also Bahia in humidis, 1830, Salzmann 181 (G); a mixed collection at G of Salzmann 182 / Salzmann 183 (MO), are all here identified as  Vigna trichocarpa . In addition, Bahia “ hirsutis, ” Salzmann s.n. (P), and Bahia “  Phaseolus luteus ” Salzm., foliis hirsutis, Salzmann s.n. (P) are also assignable to  Vigna trichocarpa, and it is possible that at least some of these specimens (especially those without a number) are from the same gathering.</p><p>Vigna trichocarpa is by far the most widely distributed and morphologically distinctive species of the subgenus, especially in fruit. The ascending fruits that parallel the inflorescence axis characterize  V. trichocarpa . In addition, the seeds of  V. trichocarpa hang from longer funicles relative to the shorter funicles of other species of V. subg.  Lasiospron . The stipules of  Vigna trichocarpa are distinctive in having the lower portion forming a spur with entire margins. Such a stipule is found otherwise among V. subg.  Lasiospron species in  V. schottii .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F2CE5123E4BFA1DB8A2F9A0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
03FA87F36F2BE5113DEBF94CBE2CFB2A.text	03FA87F36F2BE5113DEBF94CBE2CFB2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Vigna schottii (Benth.) A. Delgado & Verdc.	<div><p>6.  VIGNA SCHOTTII (Benth.) A. Delgado &amp; Verdc., in American Journal of Botany 98(10): 1711 (2011).</p><p>Phaseolus schottii Benth., Comm. Legum. Gen.: 75 (1837).</p><p>TYPE:   BRAZIL.  ad Tejuco . Schott s.n. (holotype: W  !;  isotype: NY!). non  P. schottii Benth. sensu Hassler in part, Candollea 1: 463. 1923; non  P. schottii var. longifolius (Benth.) Hassl., Candollea 1: 463. 1923; non  P. schottii var. longifolius forma intermedius Hassl., Candollea 1: 463. 1923; non  P. schottii var. longifolius forma grandiflorus Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923; non  P. schottii var. campestris Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923; non  P. schottii var. campestris forma braziliensis Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923; non  P. schottii var. campestris forma guyanensis Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923; non  P. schottii var. campestris forma transiens Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923; non  P. schottii var. tucumanensis Hassl., Candollea 1: 464. 1923. (See notes).</p><p>Phaseolus ovatus Benth., Comm. Legum. Gen.: 75 (1837). Syntypes. BRAZIL. “In campis et pascuis ad Para” Martius s.n. (not traced). “Ad Tejuco”, Schott s.n. (NY!), synon. nov. (See notes).</p><p>Phaseolus ovatus Benth. var. glabratus Benth., sensu Chodat &amp; Hassler, Bull. Herb. Boiss. Ser. 2, 4: 909. (1904).</p><p>Phaseolus schottii var. genuinus Hassl., Candollea 1: 463. 1923. Syntypes. BRAZIL. Blanchet 58 (G!, P! =  V. trichocarpa); Salzmann 181 (G! =  V. trichocarpa); PARAGUAY. Hassler 1818 (G, not seen); Hassler 5892 [5982] (NY!, US! =  V. schottii); Hassler 6465 (not seen); Hassler 6743 (G!; NY!; P!; US! =  V. schottii); Rojas 477 (G, not seen).  Phaseolus schottii var. genuinus forma ovatus Hassl., Candollea 1: 463. 1923. Syntypes. BRAZIL. Salzmann 183 (G! pro parte; P-3! =  V. trichocarpa); Blanchet 1159 (G, not seen); URUGUAY. Berro 843 (G, not seen); Osten 4671 (G, not seen); PARAGUAY. Balansa 1548 (G-3!, P-3! =  V. longifolia); Hassler 1818a (G, not seen); Hassler 6465a (G, not seen); Hassler 8470 (G-3!; K!; NY!; US!; W! =  V. schottii); Hassler 9352 (G, not seen). Specimens reported to be at G were not found in the collection. This varietal name genuinus was found to comprise more than one taxon.</p><p>Perennial (?), trailing and climbing herbaceous vine, up to 1.5 m, with fibrous roots ca. 50 cm long, foliage and reproductive parts covered with minute glandular hairs, and yellowish-white, straight hairs. Stems slender, fibrous, often with adventitious roots, sparsely to densely pilose or often hirsute, with yellowish or white hairs, ca. 2 mm long. Leaves with stipules lanceolate, distinctly spurred, upper portion 5–10 ˟ ca. 1 mm, 6-veined; lower portion ca. 2 mm long, pilose to densely strigose; stipels ovate-lanceolate, 1.5–2 mm long, subequal in length to petiolules, covered with minute glandular trichomes; petioles 2.4–6 cm long, hirsute with retrorse hairs, rachis considerably shorter, 5–10 mm long, with some antrorsely appressed hairs, canaliculate; leaflets ovate to ovate-lanceolate, usually acute at apex, with raised veins below, chartaceous and sparsely to densely sericeous, terminal leaflet 4.2–10 ˟ 2–4 cm, lateral leaflets 4–7.8 ˟ 1.8–4.2 cm. Inflorescences up to 11 cm long, peduncles 5–9 cm long, almost entirely covered with short retrorse hairs, densely strigose distally; rachis 1.5–2 cm long, with 3–5(–8) swollen, obpyriform nodes, 2.5–3 mm long, each with 4–6 alternate orifices, flowers clustered distally; primary bracts caducous, secondary bracts ca. 6 mm long, caducous; bracteoles mostly persistent at anthesis, ca. 6 mm long, longer than calyx-tube, bracts and bracteoles lanceolate and at base geniculate; pedicels shorter than calyx tube, longer and twisting in fruit, covered with retrorse, straight hairs; calyx campanulate, sparsely strigose at the base, glabrescent distally, tube longer than teeth, ca. 4 mm long, teeth triangular, subequal, 1–2 mm long, the adaxial pair broad and emarginate, lateral teeth slightly longer than lower tooth. Flowers described as golden yellow, ca. 1.5 cm long; standard broadly ovate, 1.2–1.4 ˟ 1.4–1.6 cm, bilobed at apex, with two parallel callosities on the lamina above the point of folding, the left one more prominently developed, and two fleshy auricles above the claw, claw ca. 3 mm long; wing petals longer than keel, with an obovate lamina, ca. 1.5 cm long, 8–10 mm wide, with an auricle at base, claw ca. 2 mm long; keel beaked, curved through ca. 270, 1.2–1.4 cm above the wing, with a transverse pocket above the petal claws, the claws ca. 3 mm long, fused to staminal tube, androecium with staminal tube ca. 2 cm long, vexillary stamen with a basal appendage; anthers ovate, ca. 0.5 mm long, basifixed to sub-basifixed to filaments; pollen grains triporate, with a coarsely reticulate exine; ovary straight, with a basal nectary disc less than 1 mm long, ovules 9 per ovary, style with a tenuous lower part, upper portion thickened, cylindrical, curved, pollen brush 3–4 mm long, with long-spreading hairs, produced beyond the stigma to form a short hook; stigma transversally-ovate, laterally placed. Fruit patent or rarely ascending, oblong, subcylindrical, valves thin-walled, not constricted between the seeds, turning dark brown or black at maturity, densely strigose, with golden yellow, straight hairs, 4–6 cm long, ca. 6 mm wide, elastically dehiscent, beak straight, 3 mm long. Seeds (immature) D-shaped, surface smooth, testa brown, hilum oblong, as long as seed width, covered by an epihilum, and with variable aril development.</p><p>Illustrations — Burkart (1987), as  Vigna longifolia; Hoc et al. (1993) as  Vigna longifolia; Ferrucci et al. (2002) as  Vigna longifolia .</p><p>Distribution and Habitat —This species ranges across the provinces of Corrientes, Entre Rıos, and Misiones in Argentina. In Paraguay it occurs mainly in the River Paraguay basin, and it is disjunct in El Beni, Bolivia and in the states of Espırito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, and possibly ranges south to Rio Grande do Sul, in Brazil (Fig. 3). The species occurs in woodland margins, along the shores of lakes or temporary ponds and riverbanks, and low swampy grasslands or “pajonal,” below 200 m. Flowering and fruiting throughout the year.</p><p>Etymology —Named in honour of H. W. Schott, who collected in Brazil.</p><p>Vernacular Name —“Feij ~ ao biriba.”</p><p>Representative Specimens Examined —See Appendix 1 for complete list. Argentina. — CORRIENTES: Depto. Ituzaingo, Isla Apipe Grande, Puerto San Antonio, 8 Dec 1973, A. Krapovickas 23806 (MO). Bolivia. — EL BENI: Yacuma Province, unos 60 km al E de San Borja, 22 Jul 1989, St. G. Beck 16929 (LPB, MEXU). Paraguay. — ALTO PARAGUAY: swamp bordering Rıo Tapiracuai, 11 Sep 1957, A. L. Woolston 872 (K, NY).</p><p>Notes —Bentham’ s (1837) original description of  Phaseolus ovatus was based on two specimens: in campis et pascuis ad Para collected by  Martius s.n. and ad Tejuco [Tijuca, Rıo de Janeiro] collected by Schott s.n., neither of which has been found in any of the herbaria visited or consulted by Bentham. However, there is a specimen at K which has long been considered the type of  P. ovatus . The herbarium sheet has a label that reads Pohl (not Schott) as the collector of this plant in Tejuco, Brazil. In addition, there are two comments in pencil, one in Bentham’ s handwriting, in the left bottom corner identifying it as  P. ovatus, and the other by Piper annotating it as, “possibly the type of  P. ovatus ”. Regarding the confusing information about Pohl and Schott’ s collections, Urban (1899) in  Flora Brasiliensis pointed out that, “It is a matter for grieving because which specimens Pohl [and] which specimens Schott might have collected cannot always be settled from the sheets of the Vienna herbarium”. Nonetheless, the specimen has spurred stipules, as mentioned in the description of  Phaseolus schottii . Concurrently, Bentham (1837) distinguished an unnamed variety of  P. ovatus, the type of which, at M, was identified as  Vigna luteola (Jacq.) Benth. by Verdcourt (1970). This leaves the description as the only extant original material. In addition, Bentham (1859), in  Flora Brasiliensis, listed under  P. ovatus seven specimens, including another variety:  var. glabratus, the type of which at M is conspecific with what is currently known as  V. trichocarpa . Of the other six, two are the  Martius and Schott collections cited in the original protologue, as well as the taxon mentioned above as an unnamed variety. Of the remaining three Brazilian specimens cited under  P. ovatus, two: in humidis Banda Oriental frequens, Tweedie s.n. (K), and in Brasilia meridional, A. de St. Hilaire s.n. (P), are plants like  Phaseolus diffusus (=  Vigna diffusa of this treatment) and the third, collected in Rıo Grande do Sul, Herb. Imp. Br. 1536 (P), is here treated as  Vigna schottii . Without extant syntypes, and the material cited in  Flora Brasiliensis under  P. ovatus being heterogeneous, different taxonomic interpretations have been given by authors dealing with this species name. We suggest that the name should be abandoned as it seems impossible to establish its identity.</p><p>Accordingly, the range of  Vigna schottii extends to southern Brazil, which is a possibility. In the absence of any other collections from that area, we suspect there may have been a mistake in specimen labelling.</p><p>Hassler (1923) included a number of diverse elements within his concept of  Phaseolus schottii, held together by their straight-beaked pods and sparsely hirsute-pilose to glabrescent calyces, characteristics common in V. subg.  Lasiospron . Most of the infraspecific taxa described under  P. schottii by Hassler are morphologically heterogeneous and difficult to interpret.</p><p>As discussed previously,  Vigna schottii and  V. diffusa share some morphological characters although  V. schottii is much more robust, and its leaves are commonly ovate-lanceolate, and its stipules are spurred (while those of  V. diffusa are biauriculate).  Vigna schottii also shares some characteristics with  V. trichocarpa as well; some forms of  V. schottii in central eastern Brazil have narrower leaflets similar those of  V. trichocarpa . The fruits of  V. schottii, however, are narrower and longer than those of  V. trichocarpa, in addition to being held pendent on the infructescence.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87F36F2BE5113DEBF94CBE2CFB2A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso;Lavin, Matt;Snak, Cristiane;Lewis, Gwilym P.	Delgado-Salinas, Alfonso, Lavin, Matt, Snak, Cristiane, Lewis, Gwilym P. (2022): Systematics of Vigna subgenus Lasiospron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseolinae). Systematic Botany (Basel, Switzerland) 47 (1): 97-124, DOI: 10.1600/036364422X16442668423428, URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422x16442668423428
