taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A04416CC6E18507AEC74CDC256FDD2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968334/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968334	Figure 1.a.Mitogenome organizationofP. hammoniensis drawn using OGDraw (Greiner et al., 2019). All genes are encoded in heavy (J-) strand. Gaps between genes indicate IGSs. b. Different gene order patterns in Naididae mitogenomes. Two tRNAgenes (trnF and trnP) were rearranged with TDRL events in Naididae (between Tubificinae and Naidinae) mitogenomes. St. fossularis has the same mitochondrial gene order pattern with other Naidinae species sequenced in this study (St. lacustris, C. diaphanus, C. diaphanus sp. B, and Sl. appendiculata).	Figure 1.a.Mitogenome organizationofP. hammoniensis drawn using OGDraw (Greiner et al., 2019). All genes are encoded in heavy (J-) strand. Gaps between genes indicate IGSs. b. Different gene order patterns in Naididae mitogenomes. Two tRNAgenes (trnF and trnP) were rearranged with TDRL events in Naididae (between Tubificinae and Naidinae) mitogenomes. St. fossularis has the same mitochondrial gene order pattern with other Naidinae species sequenced in this study (St. lacustris, C. diaphanus, C. diaphanus sp. B, and Sl. appendiculata).	2025-07-17	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.		Zenodo	biologists	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.			
03A04416CC6E18507AEC74CDC256FDD2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968336/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968336	Figure 2. The putative secondary structures of (a) rrnS and (b) rrnL of P. hammoniensis. Structures were predicted and helixes were numbered with reference W. laevis secondary structures (Ye et al., 2015). Roman numbers refer to domain names.Dashes indicate Watson-Crick base pairing and dots indicate G-U base pairing.	Figure 2. The putative secondary structures of (a) rrnS and (b) rrnL of P. hammoniensis. Structures were predicted and helixes were numbered with reference W. laevis secondary structures (Ye et al., 2015). Roman numbers refer to domain names.Dashes indicate Watson-Crick base pairing and dots indicate G-U base pairing.	2025-07-17	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.		Zenodo	biologists	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.			
03A04416CC6C185E7849776CC07DFA04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968338/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968338	Figure 3. RSCU values and preferred anticodon pattern among Clitellata. Colors indicate preferred nucleotides at the 3rd codon position. Red-marked tRNA anticodons emphasize that do not exhibit an exact-match between related tRNA anticodon and preferred mRNA codons.	Figure 3. RSCU values and preferred anticodon pattern among Clitellata. Colors indicate preferred nucleotides at the 3rd codon position. Red-marked tRNA anticodons emphasize that do not exhibit an exact-match between related tRNA anticodon and preferred mRNA codons.	2025-07-17	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.		Zenodo	biologists	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.			
03A04416CC6C185E7849776CC07DFA04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968340/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968340	Figure 4. Comparison of dN/dS values of mitochondrial PCGs ofClitellata.For eachgene, the bottom and top of the line indicates the minimum and maximum values respectively. All mitochondrial genes seem to be under negative purifying selection (dN/dS <1).	Figure 4. Comparison of dN/dS values of mitochondrial PCGs ofClitellata.For eachgene, the bottom and top of the line indicates the minimum and maximum values respectively. All mitochondrial genes seem to be under negative purifying selection (dN/dS <1).	2025-07-17	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.		Zenodo	biologists	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.			
03A04416CC6C185E7849776CC07DFA04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16968343/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16968343	Figure 5. ML tree created in IQTREEdisplaying the phylogenetic relationships betweendifferent families within Clitellata.Bootstrapsupportvalues are shown at the base of each clade with>80% showing high support. Species names in red represent the newly sequenced clitellate mitogenomes. Nine different gene order patterns observed in Clitellata were given at the end of the figure.	Figure 5. ML tree created in IQTREEdisplaying the phylogenetic relationships betweendifferent families within Clitellata.Bootstrapsupportvalues are shown at the base of each clade with>80% showing high support. Species names in red represent the newly sequenced clitellate mitogenomes. Nine different gene order patterns observed in Clitellata were given at the end of the figure.	2025-07-17	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.		Zenodo	biologists	Mercan, Deniz;Horenkamp, Austin;Aydemir, Merve Nur;Aydemir, Habeş Bilal;Neubig, Kurt;Arslan, Naime;Anderson, Frank E.			
