taxonID	type	description	language	source
0B6E420DAE76FFBE10DFFC5BFB8D2086.taxon	description	Notes: The name S. cuneifolia was proposed by Roxburgh (1832), in ‘ Flora Indica’. According to Stafleu and Cowan (1983) Roxburgh’s specimens and types are known to be placed at BM, BR, E, G, K and LIV; small set at B (Willd), C, DBN, E, FI, NY, OXF, P, PH, UPS (Thunb.). Stafleu and Cowan (1983) also stated that Roxburgh’s drawings are of great importance for the typification of Roxburgh’s species. As Roxburgh’s collection or specimens referred for description could not be traced for the name S. cuneifolia, Roxburgh’s drawing with ‘ Roxburgh number 341 ’ is referred to study as an original material which depicts the characters mentioned in the protologue, and it is designated here as lectotype.	en	V. V., Nimbalkar, G. M., Tambde, Sardesai, M. M. (2021): Lectotypification of six names in the genus Sida (Malvaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 96-100, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12
0B6E420DAE76FFBF10DFF94AFC142302.taxon	description	Notes: Wight and Arnott (1834) described S. mysorensis based on collections by different collectors. They can be considered as syntypes. Among which, Borssum (1966) cited Wight’s specimen with number ‘ 183 ’ which is from Heyne’s herbarium as mentioned by Noltie (2005) and connected to Wallich catalogue no. 1855. Two sheets of Heyne’s collection from Mysore are housed at K, one with number ‘ 183 ’ and the other without a number, but the date of collection (14 th May, 1800) for both specimens indicates that the specimens are part of a single gathering. Moreover, the sheet with number ‘ 183 ’ has two specimens mounted on it with two different barcode numbers (K 000659370, K 000659371). One of them (K 000659370) is designated here as the second-step lectotype considering the type citation by Borssum (1966) as a first-step lectotypification.	en	V. V., Nimbalkar, G. M., Tambde, Sardesai, M. M. (2021): Lectotypification of six names in the genus Sida (Malvaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 96-100, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12
0B6E420DAE77FFBF10DFFAB6FB0921A0.taxon	description	Notes: Forsskal (1775) in the protologue cited his collection from Surdud, Arabia. Two relevant specimens could be traced at C (C 10003059, C 10003061) and one at BM (BM 000603910). Of those, C 10003059 with fruits is designated here as the lectotype. The specimen is determined as ‘ proposed lectotype’ by O. A. Leistner in May, 1967, but this has not been seen as published so far and this cannot be considered as effective publication (Art. 7.10 of ICN, Turland et al., 2018).	en	V. V., Nimbalkar, G. M., Tambde, Sardesai, M. M. (2021): Lectotypification of six names in the genus Sida (Malvaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 96-100, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12
0B6E420DAE74FFBD124FFAF4FEC32722.taxon	description	Notes: The herbarium and types of Cavanilles are at MA, and many of his names are based on specimens in P, P-LA, and P-JU (Stafleu and Cowan, 1976). As the name S. repens is published based on Dombey’s collection, search for the specimen was attempted in MA as well as P. Two specimens of S. repens collected by Dombey at P could be traced which matches well with the protologue description. Moreover, one specimen (MA- 656279) from ‘ Cavanilles Type collection’ section was found at MA and as per the discussion with Eva Garcia Ibanez, Curator of the herbarium, Joseph Dombey was part of Ruiz & Pavon’s expedition to Peru, which took place between 1778 and 1788. Some of the herbarium specimens of this expedition were taken out by Cavanilles in order to create his separate ‘ Type collection’. With this in mind, the specimen which is part of ‘ Cavanilles type collection’ is selected here as lectotype. Additionally, the specimen (MA- 656279) bears the number ‘ 29787 ’ on a small label, which was added to the specimen at the beginning of the 20 th century, when it was on loan to the Field Museum (USA). The number ‘ 29787 ’ was used in some publications (Fryxell, 1985) and electronic database (Tropicos), but it is added to the sheet when the specimens was lodged and renumbered at the Field Museum (USA), and it is neither a ‘ collection number’ nor an accession number or barcode number added by MA.	en	V. V., Nimbalkar, G. M., Tambde, Sardesai, M. M. (2021): Lectotypification of six names in the genus Sida (Malvaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 96-100, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12
0B6E420DAE75FFBD124FFED6FB1827BB.taxon	description	Fig. 5 Notes: A specimen at K (K 000659357), part of the Wight Herbarium is identified as type material of the name Sida scabrida Wight & Arn., supported by Wight’s catalogue No. 198 as mentioned in the protologue and it precisely matches with it. Therefore, the specimen is designated here as lectotype. Sivarajan and Pradeep (1994) cited the type of S. scabrida as ‘ Wight 166 ’, but the specimen cited in the protologue is ‘ Wight! cat. n. 198 ’ and should only serve as type material. Noltie (2005) also noted that the type material for this name is ‘ WC 198 ’. He also commented that he could not trace a specimen at K. However, the specimen referred to in the protologue was traced at K and an image of the same is provided here.	en	V. V., Nimbalkar, G. M., Tambde, Sardesai, M. M. (2021): Lectotypification of six names in the genus Sida (Malvaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 96-100, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12
0B6E420DAE75FFBA10DFFE4FFF4C2484.taxon	description	Notes: While describing Sida schimperiana, Richard (1847) cited collections of G. H. W. Schimper, Richard Quartin-Dillon and Anton Petit in the protologue. Vollesen (1986) inadvertently lectotypified the name (Art. 7.11 of ICN, Turland et al., 2018) by citing Schimper’s collection at P as the type. There are five such relevant specimens at P (viz., P 00761802, P 00761804, P 00761805, P 00761806 and P 00761807, of the same gathering Schimper 282) and it cannot be ascertained which particular specimen was designated as lectotype. Thus, we have considered the type citation of Vollesen (1986) as first-step lectotypification and one of the specimens (P 00761807) is designated here as the second-step lectotype, which bears fruit and a label indicating the specimen from Schimper’s herbarium.	en	V. V., Nimbalkar, G. M., Tambde, Sardesai, M. M. (2021): Lectotypification of six names in the genus Sida (Malvaceae). Rheedea 31 (2): 96-100, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12
