taxonID	type	description	language	source
0E6687EDFFB3FF82FF71FD06135CFEFC.taxon	description	(Fig. 1)	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB3FF82FF71FD06135CFEFC.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. Green Point Common, near Cape Town, Western Cape Province, Republic of South Africa. Type material. Lectotype. parthenogenetic female on slide GOS F 9199 on G. O. Sars collection, labelled “ Alona striolata, Green Point Common, South Africa ” deposited at Zoological Museum of Oslo University. Paralectotypes. three parthenogenetic females and three ephippial females on the same slide. Other material studied. 9 parthenogenetic female on slide GOS F 9200 in G. O. Sars collection, labelled “ Alona striolata, Cape of Good Hope ”, deposited at Zoological Museum of Oslo University; 2 parthenogenetic females, 9 ephippial females, 5 adult males, 2 juvenile males of instar II, 1 juvenile male of instar 1 on slide GOS F 9189 in G. O. Sars collection, labelled “ Alona elegans, Cape of Good Hope ”, deposited at Zoological Museum of Oslo University. The slides in Canada balsam are rather thick, and it was impossible to use high magnification of optical microscope for examination. Many structures, for example, lateral groups of setulae on postabdomens, remain obscure.	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB3FF82FF71FD06135CFEFC.taxon	description	Description. Parthenogenetic female. In lateral view, body ovoid, strongly compressed laterally, low in juveniles (Fig. 1 A), moderately high in adults (Fig 1 B – C). Maximum height before the middle of body. Height-length ratio about 0.65 in adults. Dorsal margin evenly convex, postero-dorsal angle weakly defined, postero-ventral angle rounded. Posterior margin almost straight, ventral margin almost straight, antero-ventral angle rounded. Postero-ventral angle without denticles. Carapace at small magnification appears to be covered by densely spaced longitudinal lines (Fig. 1 D). Head relatively small, triangular-round in lateral view, rostrum short, pointing downward. Eye very large, two – three times larger than ocellus. Distance from the tip of rostrum to the ocellus greater than that between the ocellus and the eye. Head shield covered by same sculpture as valves. Three connected head pores. Labrum (Fig. 1 E – F) relatively large, labral keel very wide (height / width ratio about 1.25), with a broadly rounded apex. Anterior margin of keel convex. Thorax two times longer than abdomen. Dorsal surface of abdominal segments not saddle-shaped. No abdominal projections. Postabdomen (Fig. 1 G – H) of moderate length and width, with almost parallel margins in anal portion, strongly narrowing in postanal portion, with broadly rounded distal angle. Length about 2.5 height. Ventral margin convex. Basis of claws bordered from distal margin by clear incision. Distal marginal convex. Dorsal margin with distal part 1.8 – 2 times longer than preanal one; anal portion longer than postanal. Postanal portion weakly convex to almost straight; anal portion weakly concave. Preanal angle weakly defined, postanal angle not defined. Postanal margin (Fig. 1 H) with 6 – 7 clusters of 2 – 4 elemental marginal denticles, decreasing in size basally. Length of longest elements less than width of postabdominal claw base. Anal margin with 4 – 5 groups of setulae. Postabdominal claw weakly curved, of moderate length, as long as preanal portion of postabdomen. Basal spine long and thin, about 0.3 – 0.35 of length of claw. Antennule narrow elongated, almost reaching tip of rostrum. Antenna short (Fig. 1 I). Antennal formula, setae 0 - 0 - 3 / 1 - 1 - 3, spines 1 - 0 - 1 / 0 - 0 - 1. Basipodite robust, branches short and stout. Basal segments of both branches almost two times longer than middle and apical segments. Seta arising from basal segment of endopodite thin, longer than endopodite. Seta arising from middle segment of endopodite as long as shortest apical setae. Both apical segments with one shorter and two longer setae of similar thickness. Spine on basal segment of exopodite about 2 / 3 length of middle segment. Spines from apical segments as long as respective apical segments. Thoracic limbs: five pairs. Morphology of thoracic limbs similar to that of other species of subgenus Ephemeralona. Limb I with IDL seta 3 as long as ODL seta (Fig. 1 J); seta 2 slightly shorter than seta 3, seta 1 not observed. Limb III exopodite (Fig. 1 K) rounded, seta 3 being longest, setae 4, 5 and 6 of about 2 / 3, 1 / 2 and 1 / 4 length of seta 3, respectively (seta 1 – 2 not observed). Limb IV exopodite (Fig. 1 L) rounded, with 6 setae, setae 1 – 3 long, of similar length; seta 4 slightly shorter than seta 3, seta 5 slightly shorter than seta 4; seta 6 two times shorter than seta 5. Ephippial female (Fig. 1 N – M) of similar body shape as parthenogenetic female, but with more developed posterodorsal angle of valves, posterior margin of valves straight or weakly concave. Ephippium with egg locules covered by thicker lines than the rest of the valves. Male. Juvenile males of instar I and II (Fig. 1 O, Q) and adult male (Fig. 1 S) have low oval body of similar shape, lower than in female, height / length ratio 0.57. Dorsal margin only weakly curved. Ocellus and eye of same size as in female. Postabdomen in juvenile males of instar I similar to that of female (Fig. 1 P), but shorter and higher, sperm duct openings not distinctive, postanal denticles and postabdominal claw of same morphology as in female. In juvenile males of instar II postabdomen (Fig. 1 R) similar to that of female, but more narrow, sperm duct opening located close to the end of postabdomen, postanal denticles as in female, postabdominal claw shorter than in female, its length less than length of preanal portion of postabdomen. In adult male, postabdomen (Fig. 1 T) narrow, more strongly narrowing in anal portion, weakly narrowing in postanal portion, with obtuse dorso-distal angle. Ventro-distal angle well-defined, almost straight. Sperm duct openings located ventrally at the end of postabdomen. Postanal angle not defined, preanal angle weakly defined. Distal part of postabdomen 2.2 times longer than preanal. Clusters of short setulae in place of marginal denticles. Postabdominal claw two times shorter than in female, pointed, basal spine long very short. Thoracic limb I of adult male (Fig. 1 U) with short U-shaped copulatory hook 1.5 times shorter than limb itself. Copulatory brush present. Ventral face of limb below them with double row of short thick setulae. Size. In single juvenile female of instar II length was 0.33 mm, height 0.19 mm, in adult parthenogenetic females length 0.38 – 0.45 mm, height 0.25 – 0.29 mm. In ephippial females, maximum length 0.46 mm, height 0.31 mm. In single juvenile male of instar I length was 0.26 mm, height 0.16 mm, in single juvenile male of instar II length was 0.28 mm, height 0.18 mm, in two studied adult male, length 0.32 and 0.33 mm, height 0.18 mm in both specimens.	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB3FF82FF71FD06135CFEFC.taxon	diagnosis	Differential diagnosis: Coronatella (Ephemeralona) striolata shares main diagnostic features of subgenus Ephemeralona (see Sinev 2022 b), including sculpturing of the valves as densely spaced lines, seta arising from basal segment of antennal endopodite much longer than endopodite, and setae 2 – 3 of IDL armed with uniform thin setulae. It clearly differs from all other species of the subgenus in extremely large eye and ocellus in both male and female. C. (E.) striolata have more dense sculpturing of valves than most other species of the subgenus and almost straight posterior margin of valves, characters shared only by C. (E.) vermiculata (see below). C. (E.) striolata also clearly differs from C. (E.) salina, C. (E.) irinae, C. (E.) floessneri (see Alonso 1996; Sinev et al. 2009) and C. (E.) vermiculata in long seta 4 of exopodite III (in these species it is 2 – 3 times shorter than seta 5), and from C. (E.) orellanai (see Alonso 1996) in single row of lateral groups of setulae on postabdomen. Males of C. (E.) striolata differs from all other species in shape of postabdomen, which is narrow elongated, evenly narrowing distally, with evenly concave anal and postanal portion. Males of most species of the genus have wider postabdomens with parallel margins in anal portion (see Sinev 2022 b), similar to that of C. (E.) vermiculata (see below). Asian C. (E). floessneri and C. (E.) irinae (see Sinev et al. 2009) have male postabdomens of somewhat similar to C. (E). striolata shape, but with shorter distal portion, being only 1.5 times longer than preanal portion, stongly narrowing in anal portion, and with postanal margin being parallel to ventral margin.	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB3FF82FF71FD06135CFEFC.taxon	distribution	Distribution. To date this rare species is known only from two locations in Cape peninsula, it is probably an endemic of Cape region of South Africa.	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB4FF8BFF71FEB2123FFE68.taxon	description	(Fig. 2 – 6)	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB4FF8BFF71FEB2123FFE68.taxon	materials_examined	Type material and type locality were not designated, type series includes three slides deposited in Australian Museum, Sydney, in Zooloogical museum of M. V. Lomosov Moscow State University, and in Zoological Museum of Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg. All these slides are from the same locality, labeled as “ Lake near Island Lake, via Cooma, New South Wales, Australia ”. So the type locality and lectotype are designated here. Type locality. Lake near Island Lake, via Cooma, New South Wales, Australia, 12.05.1975, coll. B. V. Timms. Approximated coordinates of locality: 36 ° 14 ' S, 148 ° 56 ' E. Lectotype. Parthenogenetic female from type locality, deposited in Australian Museum, Sydney, access number P. 27687.001. Paralectotypes. Parthenogenetic female from type locality on slide 2982 (type series) from N. N. Smirnov’s slide collection deposited in Zoological Museum of M. V. Lomonosov State University, Moscow, no separate access number; parthenogenetic female from type locality on slide 2982 (type series) from N. N. Smirnov’s slide collection deposited in Zoological Museum of Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, access number 54875. Other material studied. 8 adult parthenogenetic females from unnamed lake via Berridale, north-west of Cootralantra Lake (lake coordinates 36 ˚ 15 ’ 47.40 ” S, 148 ˚ 53 ’ 25.95 ” E) New South Wales, Australia, 12.05.1975, NNS- 2000 - 030, from N. N. Smirnov’s sample collection kept at A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, labeled as Alona davidi vermiculata by N. N. Smirnov; 3 parthenogenetic females, 1 male from roadside ditch near Beeac road near Lake Weering salt lake (lake coordinates 38 ˚ 04 ’ 51.24 ” S, 143 ˚ 40 ’ 3013 ” E), Victoria, Australia, 13.12.1986, coll. D. G. Frey, DGF- 8132 in the collection of Prof. D. G. Frey at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institutes, Washington D. C., USA, general access number 403774.	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB4FF8BFF71FEB2123FFE68.taxon	description	Description. Parthenogenetic female. General. In lateral view, body ovoid, compressed laterally, moderately high (Fig. 2 A, K 3 A – D). Maximum height at before the middle of body. Height-length ratio 0.55 – 0.6 in adults. Dorsal margin unevenly convex, with almost straight posterior portion, postero-dorsal angle weakly defined, and postero-ventral angles broadly rounded. Posterior margin weakly convex, ventral margin almost straight, antero-ventral angle rounded. No gap between ventral margins of valves (Fig. 3 C). Ventral margin (Fig. 2 B) with about 55 setae. About 12 anterior setae longer than others, next 10 setae short, posterior setae of moderate length. Armament of postero-ventral angle (Fig. 2 C – F, L, 3 E) very variable. Two-six posteriormost ventral setae thicker than previous, without plumose setulation, in some specimens one – three last setae transformed into triangular spines. Setae followed with 20 – 40 short setulae not organized into groups. A row of about 80 very short setulae on inner side of carapace parallel to ventral margin of valves. Carapace covered by thick, densely spaced longitudinal lines, the distance between lines is much smaller than the width of the lines (Fig. 3 E – F). Head (Fig. 3 G – H) relatively small, triangular-round in lateral view, rostrum short, truncated, pointing downward. Eye larger than ocellus. Distance from the tip of rostrum to the ocellus greater than that between the ocellus and the eye. Headshield (Fig. 3 H, 4 A) with maximum width behind mandibular articulation, with same sculpturing as on valves. Rostrum short, with truncated apex. Posterior margin of headshield broadly rounded, sometimes slightly wavy. Three narrowly connected major head pores (Fig. 2 G, 3 D), middle pore slightly smaller than others, located at the middle between others. PP about 0.5 – 0.6 IP in adults. Lateral head pores slightly elongated, located at about 0.7 IP distance from midline, at the level of the anterior major head pore. Labrum relatively large (Fig. 2 H – I). Labral keel wide (height / width ratio about 1.25), with a broadly rounded apex. Anterior margin of keel convex, posterior margin without clusters of setulae. Thorax two times longer than abdomen. Dorsal surface of abdominal segments (Fig. 4 D) not saddle-shaped. No abdominal projections. Postabdomen (Fig. 4 D, 5 A – B, D) of moderate length and width, with almost parallel margins in anal portion, narrowing in postanal portion, with broadly rounded distal angle. Length about 2.5 – 2.7 height. Ventral margin straight. Basis of claws bordered from distal margin by clear incision. Distal marginal convex. Dorsal margin with distal part 1.8 – 2 times longer than preanal one; postanal portion slightly longer than anal portion. Postanal portion weakly convex to almost straight; anal portion weakly concave. Preanal angle well defined, postanal angle weakly defined to not defined. Postanal margin (Fig. 4 E) with 7 – 8 clusters of 2 – 4 elemental marginal denticles, decreasing in size basally. In population from NNS denticles shorter, and 1 – 2 distal groups are merged into composite denticle. In population from DGF denticles longer and more numerous, no groups are merged. Length of longest elements less than width of postabdominal claw base. Anal margin with 3 – 4 groups of setulae. Eight – ten groups of lateral setulae in the main row; postanal groups wide, closely spaced, consisting of 10 – 15 setulae each, with distalmost setula being longest and thicker than others. Length of distalmost setulae equal or slightly greater than width of postabdominal claw base. Postabdominal claw (Fig. 4 F) weakly curved, of moderate length, as long as preanal portion of postabdomen. Basal spine long and thin, about 0.3 of length of claw, a cluster of 3 – 6 long setulae located near its base. Antennule (Fig. 2 J) narrow elongated, almost reaching tip of rostrum, with 3 clusters of long setulae at anterior face. Length / width ratio about 2.5. Antennular sensory seta slender, 2.5 times shorter than antennule, arising at about 2 / 3 distance from the base. Nine aesthetascs, three longest about 2 / 3 length of antennule. Antenna short (Fig. 3 G, 4 C, 5 C). Antennal formula, setae 0 - 0 - 3 / 1 - 1 - 3, spines 1 - 0 - 1 / 0 - 0 - 1. Two coxal setae. Basipodite robust, branches short and stout. Basal segments of both branches almost two times longer than middle and apical segments. Seta arising from basal segment of endopodite thin, longer than endopodite. Seta arising from middle segment of endopodite as long as shortest apical setae. Both apical segments with one shorter and two longer setae of similar thickness. Spine on basal segment of exopodite slightly shorter than middle segment. Spines from apical segments longer than respective apical segments. Thoracic limbs: five pairs. Limb I (Fig. 6 A – B) of moderate size. Epipodite oval, with process as long as epipodite. Accessory seta long and thick, about 2 / 3 length of ODL seta. ODL seta with minute setulation. IDL with 3 setae; seta 1 very small; seta 3 as long as ODL seta; seta 2 slightly shorter than seta 3. Setae 2 and 3 armed with thin spinules. Endite 3 with four setae, seta 1 shorter and thinner than others (a – c). Endite 2 with seta d as long as setae of endite 3; seta e very long, longer than limb itself; seta f about 3 / 5 length of seta e. Endite 1 with 2 distally setulated 2 - segmented setae (g – h) and a long flat seta (i) as long as setae a – d. No naked inner setae (2 – 3) and sensillae on endites 1 and 2. Six rows of thin long setulae on ventral face of limb. Two ejector hooks, one longer than other. Limb II (Fig. 6 C – D). Exopodite elongated, with seta shorter than exopodite. Eight scraping spines armed with thin setulae, decreasing in length basally, setae 1 – 5 long, setae 6 – 8 much shorter, with more robust spinulae. Small seta located near the base of scraper 1. Distal armature of gnathobase with 4 elements. Filter plate with 7 setae, two posteriormost setae considerably shorter than others. Limb III (Fig. 6 E – F). Epipodite oval without process. Exopodite rounded, with 6 setae. Seta 3 extremely long, two times longer than longest setae of exopodites IV – V; seta 5 and 6 of about 1 / 3 and 1 / 5 length of seta 3, respectively, other setae very short. Setae 1 – 4 plumose, seta 5 armed with two types of setulae in distal portion, seta 6 armed with short setulae in dorsal portion. Distal endite with three setae; two distalmost setae (1 – 2) slender, sharp, of similar length, with long denticles in distal part; basalmost seta 1.5 times shorter, flattened and setulated in distal portion. Basal endite with 4 outer setae (a – d) increasing in length basally. Gnathobase not clearly separated from basal endite. Inner portion of limb typical for morphology of the genus not studied in detail. Filter plate with seven setae. Limb IV (Fig. 6 G – H). Preepipodite setulated; epipodite oval, with process as long as epipodite. Exopodite rounded, with 6 setae; seta 3 longest; seta 1 – 2 slightly shorter than seta seta 3; setae 4, 5 and 6 of about 1 / 3, 2 / 3 and 1 / 2 length of seta 3, respectively. Setae 1 – 4 flattened, plumose; setae 5 and 6 slender, with short setulae in distal portion. Inner lobe of limb IV with 4 setae and small sensillum (Fig. 6 H). Distalmost seta (1) slender, sharp, flaming-torch seta (2 – 4) of similar size, with elongated basal portion, armed 7 – 9 thin setulae each. Three soft setae (a – c) increasing in size basally. Gnathobase with 2 - segmented seta, and a small mound distally. Filter plate with 5 setae. Limb V (Fig. 4 I). Preepipodite setulated, epipodite oval, with process as long as epipodite. Exopodite elongated oval, not divided into two lobes, with four plumose setae with thick basal portion, decreasing in size basally; seta 4 three times shorter than seta 1. Inner lobe of limb rounded, with setulated inner margin. At inner face, two setae, one 2 times longer than another. Filter plate not found. Ephippial female unknown. Male. Adult male (Fig. 2 M) with low oval body, lower than in female, height / length ratio 0.57. Dorsal margin only weakly curved. Ocellus and eye smaller than in female. Labrum slightly broader that in female (Fig. 2 O), posteroventral angle of valves (Fig. 2 N) with same armament as in female. Postabdomen (Fig. 5 E) moderately wide, with almost parallel margins in anal portion, slightly narrowing distally in postanal portion, with broadly rounded dorso-distal angle. Ventro-distal angle well defined, obtuse. Sperm duct openings located ventrally at the end of postabdomen. Postanal angle not defined, preanal angle well-defined, prominent. Distal part of postabdomen two times longer than preanal, postanal portion slightly longer than anal. Clusters of short setulae in place of marginal denticles, lateral groups of setulae similar to these in the female. Postabdominal claw two times shorter than in female, with blunt tip with several setulae. Basal spine long, about 0.3 length of claw, a cluster of four long setulae located near its base. Antennule (Fig. 2 P) thicker than in female, with 2 lateral aesthetascs, I was unable to count terminal aesthetascs (all other species of Coronatella have 10 terminal aesthetascs). Lateral aesthetascs and longest terminal aesthetasc only slightly shorter than antennule. Male seta arising at 2 / 3 length from the base, about half of antennule length. Thoracic limb I (Fig. 6 J – K) with short U-shaped copulatory hook 1.5 times shorter than limb itself. Copulatory brush present, copulatory brush seta short. Ventral face of limb below them with double row of short thick setulae. Inner distal lobe without seta 1; setae 2 and 3 much shorter and thinner than in female, of similar length; male seta curved, slightly shorter than setae 2 – 3. Endite 3 with long slender seta 1, longer than setae a – c. Size. In adult parthenogenetic female length 0.46 – 0.54 mm, height 0.28 – 0.32 mm. In single studied adult male, length 0.37 mm, height 0.21 mm.	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB4FF8BFF71FEB2123FFE68.taxon	diagnosis	Differential diagnosis: Coronatella (Ephemeralona) vermiculata shares main diagnostic features of subgenus Ephemeralona (see Sinev 2020 b) including sculpturing of the valves as densely spaced lines, seta arising from basal segment of antennal endopodite much longer than endopodite, and setae 2 – 3 of IDL armed with uniform thin setulae. The unique characteristics of the species are truncated rostrum and spine-like setae on posteroventral angle of valves. C. (E.) vermiculata have the most densely spaced longitudinal lines on valves among the subgenus and fully sculptured head shield, this character clearly separates it from C. (E.) anemae, C. (E.) salina, C. (E). flossneri, C. (E.) irinae and C. (E.) montana, which have less densely spaced lines on valves (distance between lines much greater than line width) and head shield without distinctive sculpture (see Korovchinsky et al. 2021, Hudec 2010, Sinev et al. 2009, Sinev 2020). C. (E.) vermiculata also clearly differs from C. (E.) elegans, C. (E.) anemae, and C. (E.) montana (see Sinev 2020 b, Korovchinsky et al. 2021, Hudec 2010) in short seta 4 of exopodite III (in these species it has a similar length with seta 5), and from C. (E.) orellanai (see Alonso 1996) in single row of lateral groups of setulae on postabdomen (two in the latter species). Males of C. (E.) vermiculata clearly differ from those of C. (E.) anemae, C. (E). flossneri, C. (E.) irinae and C. (E.) striolata in wide postabdomens with parallel margins in anal portion (in all these species postbdomen is narrowing in anal portion and have narrow postanal portion).	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
0E6687EDFFB4FF8BFF71FEB2123FFE68.taxon	distribution	Distribution: Australia, New South Wales and Victoria.	en	Sinev, Artem Y. (2025): Cladocera of subgenus Coronatella (Ephemeralona) Sinev, 2020 (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South Africa and Australia. Zootaxa 5659 (2): 257-272, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.2.7
