taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
486DB03FFF83FFE7FE9EFAC3FAD50107.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14813891/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14813891	Figure 2. Mya shell morphology. A–E, Mya japonica Jay, 1857, ZMFU no. 10069/Bv-514, sampled from the open part of Peter the Great Bay, Bolshoy Pelis Island, Russia. F–J, Mya japonica Jay, 1857, ZMFU no. 23301/Bv-3785, sampled from semienclosed part of Peter the Great Bay, Vityaz Bay, Russia. K–O, Mya japonica Jay, 1857, MBM229023, sampled from Qingdao, Yellow Sea, China. P–T, Mya arenaria Linnaeus, 1758, MBM229013, sampled from Murmansk, Barents Sea, Russia.	Figure 2. Mya shell morphology. A–E, Mya japonica Jay, 1857, ZMFU no. 10069/Bv-514, sampled from the open part of Peter the Great Bay, Bolshoy Pelis Island, Russia. F–J, Mya japonica Jay, 1857, ZMFU no. 23301/Bv-3785, sampled from semienclosed part of Peter the Great Bay, Vityaz Bay, Russia. K–O, Mya japonica Jay, 1857, MBM229023, sampled from Qingdao, Yellow Sea, China. P–T, Mya arenaria Linnaeus, 1758, MBM229013, sampled from Murmansk, Barents Sea, Russia.	2018-11-30	Zhang, Junlong;Yurchenko, Olga V;Lutaenko, Konstantin A;Kalachev, Alexander V;Nekhaev, Ivan O;Aguilar, Robert;Zhan, Zifeng;Ogburn, Matthew B		Zenodo	biologists	Zhang, Junlong;Yurchenko, Olga V;Lutaenko, Konstantin A;Kalachev, Alexander V;Nekhaev, Ivan O;Aguilar, Robert;Zhan, Zifeng;Ogburn, Matthew B			
486DB03FFF86FFE5FF22F918FB960721.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14813895/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14813895	Figure 5. Genetic distance range (A), phylogenetic trees (B, D) and candidate species inferred from Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) (C). A, the COI intraspecific distance values with M. truncata are 0, 0.33, 6.93 and 7.26% marked with green spots. B, phylogenetic tree inferred by Bayesian analysis (BI). C, ABGD, based on the COI alignment, with both models of Jukes-Cantor (JC69) and Kimura (K80) TS/TV. D, phylogenetic tree inferred by maximum likelihood (ML).	Figure 5. Genetic distance range (A), phylogenetic trees (B, D) and candidate species inferred from Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) (C). A, the COI intraspecific distance values with M. truncata are 0, 0.33, 6.93 and 7.26% marked with green spots. B, phylogenetic tree inferred by Bayesian analysis (BI). C, ABGD, based on the COI alignment, with both models of Jukes-Cantor (JC69) and Kimura (K80) TS/TV. D, phylogenetic tree inferred by maximum likelihood (ML).	2018-11-30	Zhang, Junlong;Yurchenko, Olga V;Lutaenko, Konstantin A;Kalachev, Alexander V;Nekhaev, Ivan O;Aguilar, Robert;Zhan, Zifeng;Ogburn, Matthew B		Zenodo	biologists	Zhang, Junlong;Yurchenko, Olga V;Lutaenko, Konstantin A;Kalachev, Alexander V;Nekhaev, Ivan O;Aguilar, Robert;Zhan, Zifeng;Ogburn, Matthew B			
