identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
55343A7BFFD90313FF00FD3383FDFF2C.text	55343A7BFFD90313FF00FD3383FDFF2C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudochthonius maquinensis Guimarães & Prado & Ferreira 2025	<div><p>Pseudochthonius maquinensis sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 2A7FE0A6-CAF0-4BE7-902D-41A45DB1399E</p><p>Material Examined.   Holotype male (ISLA 125638), preserved in ethanol: Brazil, Cosdisburgo, Minas Gerais, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-44.351887&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-19.125237" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -44.351887/lat -19.125237)">Maquiné Cave</a> (19° 7’ 30.85” S 44° 21’ 6.80” W), November 12, 2020, collected by R.L. Ferreira  .  Paratype female (ISLA 125639), same data as the holotype .</p><p>Etymology. The epithet ‘maquinensis’ refers to the name of the cave, “Gruta do Maquiné” where the species was collected. This should be treated as an adjective.</p><p>Diagnosis.  Pseudochthonius maquinensis sp. nov. most closely resembles  P. limettioides in the following combination: absence of eyes or eyespots in male individuals; anterior carapace margin serrated up to seta ame; fixed and movable chelal fingers with 34 and 35 teeth, respectively; rallum with 7 blades.  Pseudochthonius maquinensis sp. nov. differs from  P. limettioides by the ist–est/ist–esb trichobothria ratio of 2.6 ( P. limettioides with 3.0); fixed and movable cheliceral fingers with 10–12 and 9–11 teeth, respectively ( P. limettioides with 7 and 6, respectively).</p><p>Description. Body beige, translucent; appendices in a slightly darker shade of beige (Fig. 1A) Some parts of the body scaly. Vestitural setae thin, sharp and anteriorly projected on prosoma and posteriorly projected on opisthosoma.</p><p>Carapace (Figs 2A–B). 0.95 (0.97) times longer than wide, posteriorly constricted, showing a difference between ocular width and posterior width of 0,106 mm (0,104 mm); smooth anterior margin, except in the central portion; epistome strongly toothed and serrated (Fig. 2A); absence of ocular apparatus; posterior margin of the carapace smooth; chaetotaxy 4+2: 4: 4: 2: 2 (18).</p><p>Chelicerae (Figs 3D–E). Hand with 5 setae; movable finger with 1 subdistal seta; galea present as a tubercle; fixed finger with 10 (12) acute teeth, the proximal four smaller; movable finger with 9 (11) acute teeth, in distal portion, the first tooth is separated and the second is bicuspid (Fig. 3E); rallum with 7 blades; exterior and interior serrulae with 17 and 13 blades, respectively.</p><p>Tergites. Undivided; smooth surface; chaetotaxy uniseriate: I–XI 8: 8: 8: 8: 8: 6: 6: 6: 6: 6: 2 + 2 sensory setae. Pleural membranes striated.</p><p>Coxae (Fig. 2C). Manducatory process with two apical setae; the rest of the palpal coxae with 3 setae arranged in a triangle; delicate lamellae bordered by 7(8) small spines. Pedal coxae: plumose coxal spines arranged in a single transverse row on coxae I (4–5) and II (3–5) (Fig. 2E), chaetotaxy: I 5–4(5), II 5, III 7, IV 8–9(8); intercoxal tubercle absent.</p><p>Male genital operculum (Fig. 2D). Anterior genital operculum with 8 discal setae, 6 valvular genital setae, and 10 setae along the third sternite, with 2 lateral microsetae on each side.</p><p>Female genital operculum. 8 setae distributed in three transversal rows: 2: 2: 4, genital opening not bifurcated.</p><p>Sternites. Chaetotaxy IV‒XI: 10: 8: 8: 8: 7: 7: 6: 2+2 sensory. Anal operculum with 2 ventral setae.</p><p>Palp (Figs 3A–B–C). Trochanter 1.39 times wider than long, patella 1.37 times longer than wide, femur 5.13 times longer than wide. Femoral chaetotaxy 4: 5: 3: 6: 1. Trichobothrial pattern: ib and isb located halfway on the hand portion, adjacent to each other and slightly displaced towards the paraxial face of the chela, eb proximal to esb, ist is slightly distal to esb, it distal to est, et proximal to dx, ist is halfway between esb and est, closer to esb than est (ist -est / ist -esb distance ratio = 2.6); chelal fixed finger with alternating heterodonty after the 7 th teeth, with 34 acute teeth, except in the most proximal portion, which is rounded; movable finger with 35(32) acute and projected backwards teeth (Figs 3A, C).</p><p>Leg IV (Fig. 4B). Arolia slightly smaller than claws.</p><p>Measurements (length/width or depth in mm and ratios in parentheses calculated with three significant digits). Male holotype. Body length 1.35. Carapace 0.58/0.56 (1.04), Palps: trochanter 0.15/0.11 (1.36), femur 0.53/0.10 (5.30), patella 0.14/0.10 (1.40), chela 0.81/0.12 (6.75), movable finger length 0.51. Leg I: trochanter 0.11/0.07 (1.57), femur 0.25/0.05 (6.25), patella 0.18/0.04 (4.50), tibia 0.11/0.04 (3.66), tarsus 0.27/0.03 (8.66). Leg IV: trochanter 0.13/0.10, femur 0.26/0.18, patella 0.29/0.14, femur/patella ratio 0.90, tibia 0.32/0.07, basitarsus 0.16/0.05, telotarsus 0.32/0.03.</p><p>Ecological remarks</p><p>Maquiné Cave is Brazil’s oldest tourist cave, open since 1908. In 1967, its infrastructure was modernized with stairs, topographical modifications, and electric lighting. Although incorporated into a conservation unit in 2005 (Fig. 5A), its entrance remains altered to facilitate tourist access (Fig. 5B). Extending approximately 600 meters, the cave’s deeper sections (Fig. 5C) maintain a relative humidity of 91% and an average temperature of 24ºC.</p><p>For years, a fine mesh gate prevented bats from entering the cave to reduce guano accumulation on speleothems and minimize disturbances to visitors. This significantly reduced organic input, forcing invertebrates to rely on debris from tourist infrastructure, such as wood scraps and food remnants. Consequently, cave fauna became concentrated along the tourist path, increasing their risk of trampling.</p><p>Fortunately, the removal of the gate about a decade ago allowed bats to recolonize the cave, restoring guano deposits, particularly in non-touristic areas. This led to a resurgence of invertebrate populations in more protected zones. The first  P. maquinensis sp. nov. specimens were recorded in 1999 within the tourist area (Fig. 5E), and early surveys (1999–2001) typically detected only a single specimen per sampling event. However, more recent surveys (after the gate removal) recorded around five specimens, suggesting a potential population recovery.</p><p>Other troglobitic species in Maquiné Cave include  Spaeleoleptes spaeleus Soares, 1966,  Tricongius ybyguara Rheims &amp; Brescovit, 2004, and  Eukoenenia maquinensis Souza &amp; Ferreira, 2010 . Despite conservation efforts, remnants of tourist infrastructure persist, posing potential risks to the cave fauna (Fig. 5D).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/55343A7BFFD90313FF00FD3383FDFF2C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Guimarães, Lucas;Prado, Guilherme C.;Ferreira, Rodrigo L.	Guimarães, Lucas, Prado, Guilherme C., Ferreira, Rodrigo L. (2025): Two new troglobitic species of Pseudochthonius Balzan, 1892 (Pseudoscorpiones, Chthoniidae) from Southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 5621 (1): 52-68, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5621.1.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5621.1.2
55343A7BFFDC0319FF00FEA7878FFE5C.text	55343A7BFFDC0319FF00FEA7878FFE5C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudochthonius urubuquaqua Guimarães & Prado & Ferreira 2025	<div><p>Pseudochthonius urubuquaqua sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: AF047933-5787-49FA-B5D6-F98F3C19C600</p><p>Material Examined.   Holotype male (ISLA 125640), preserved in ethanol: Brazil, Cosdisburgo, Minas Gerais, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-44.339165&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-19.169167" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -44.339165/lat -19.169167)">Gruta da Morena Cave</a> (19°10’09.0”S 44°20’21.0”W), December 16, 2009, collected by. R. Bessi et al  .  Paratype female (ISLA 125641), same locality as the holotype, collected by R.L. Ferreira on December 20, 2022 .</p><p>Etymology. The specific name urubuquaqua refers to “ No Urubuquaquá, no Pinhém ”, a book of stories by the famous Brazilian writer João Guimarães Rosa, born in Cordisburgo. Within the pages of this romance, the author finds an answer to his need to explore living things. It is to be treated as a noun in apposition.</p><p>Diagnosis.  Pseudochthonius urubuquaqua sp. nov. most closely resembles  P. biseriatus in the following combination: absence of eyes or eyespots; fixed and movable chelal fingers with 38 and 33–39 teeth, respectively; fixed and movable cheliceral fingers with 10–13 and 10–11 teeth, respectively.  Pseudochthonius urubuquaqua sp. nov. differs from  P. biseriatus by the anterior carapace margin entirely serrated ( P. biseriatus serrated up to seta ame); ist–est/ist–esb trichobothria ratio of 2.5 ( P. biseriatus with 1.78–2.10); rallum with 7 blades ( P. biseriatus with 9).</p><p>P. urubuquaqua sp. nov. differs from  P. maquinensis sp. nov. in the following combinations:  P. urubuquaqua sp. nov. larger. 1.43–1.77 mm ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. 1.35–1.51 mm); carapace narrower, 0.46/ 0.43 mm ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. 0.58/ 0.56 mm), with a pronounced posterior constriction, 0.131 mm in females ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. 0.104 mm in females); anterior margin serrated between setae ml ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. with fully serrated). Palps more elongated, femur slimmer; ratio 7.1 ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. ratio 5.13). Chela longer, 1.15/ 0.18 mm ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. 0.81/ 0.12 mm); chelal fixed finger with alternating heterodonty starting after the 8th tooth, with 38 teeth ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. with alternating heterodonty after the 7 th teeth, 34 teeth). Chelal movable finger with 33 teeth and 39 in female ( P. maquinensis sp. nov. 35 and 32 in female). Leg I thinner, femur longer, ratio 7.0 ( P. maquinensis sp. nov.; ratio 5.25). Tarsus more elongated, ratio 12.3 ( P. maquinensis sp. nov., ratio 8.96). Male genital operculum more pronounced, with a larger opening and two straight-line marks on the third tergite. Females of  P. urubuquaqua sp. nov. with a distinctly evident tubercle-shaped galea on the cheliceral movable finger, absent in males ( P. maquinensis present in both males and females).</p><p>Description. Male body beige, translucent (females slightly darker beige); appendices beige similar to the body (Fig. 1B). Some parts of the body scaly. Vestitural setae thin, sharp and anteriorly projected on prosoma and posteriorly projected on opisthosoma.</p><p>Carapace (Figs 6A–B). 1.07 (0.93) times longer than wide, posteriorly constricted, showing a difference between ocular width and posterior width of 0.108 mm (0.131); anterior margin serrated between the setae al and aml, the most prominent at the central region (between the ame setae and the epistome); epistome strongly toothed and serrated (Fig. 6A); absence of ocular apparatus; posterior margin of the carapace smooth; chaetotaxy 4+2: 4: 4: 2: 2 (18).</p><p>Chelicerae (Figs 6F, 7A). Hand with 5 setae; movable finger with 1 subdistal seta; galea present only in females as a tubercle and absent in males; fixed finger with 10 (13) acute teeth, movable finger with 11 (10) acute teeth, the first distal tooth is separated; rallum with 7 blades; exterior and interior serrulae with 18 and 13 (14) blades, respectively.</p><p>Tergites. Undivided; smooth surface; chaetotaxy uniseriate: I–XI: 4: 2 (4): 2: 4: 4: 6: 4: 4: 4(2): 2: 1(2) + 2 sensory setae. Pleural membranes striated.</p><p>Coxae (Fig. 6C). Manducatory process with two apical setae; the rest of the palpal coxae with 3 setae arranged in a triangle; delicate lamellae bordered by 10 small spines. Pedal coxae: plumose coxal spines arranged in a single transverse row on coxae I (3–4) and II (6–5) (Figs 6C–E), chaetotaxy: I 3–4 (5), II 4 (5), III 7, IV 9 (8); intercoxal tubercle absent.</p><p>Male genital operculum (Fig. 6D). Anterior genital operculum with 8 discal setae, 6 valvular genital setae, and 6 setae along the sternite, with 2 lateral microsetae on each side. Well-pronounced, with a larger opening that extends almost to the end of the third sternite, and bearing two straight-line marks on the third tergite.</p><p>Female genital operculum. 8 setae distributed in three transverse rows: 2: 2: 4, genital opening not bifurcated.</p><p>Sternites. Chaetotaxy IV‒XI: 10 (6): 8 (10): 8 (6): 6: 6 (4): 6: 4: 2 Anal operculum with 2 ventral setae.</p><p>Palp (Fig. 7C). Trochanter 1.4 times wider than long, patella 1.8 times longer than wide, femur 7.1 times longer than wide. Femoral chaetotaxy 5: 6 (5): 3: 6: 1. Trichobothrial pattern: ib and isb located halfway on the hand portion, adjacent to each other and slightly displaced towards the paraxial face of the chela, eb proximal to esb, ist is slightly distal to esb, it distal to est, et proximal to dx, ist is halfway between esb and est, closer to esb than est (ist -est / ist -esb distance ratio = 2.2). Chelal fixed finger with 38 acute teeth; mobile finger with 36(38) acute and projected backwards teeth.</p><p>Leg IV (Fig. 8B). Arolia almost the same size as claw.</p><p>Measurements (length/width or depth in mm and ratios in parentheses calculated with three significant digits). Male holotype. Body length 1.43 (paratype female 1.77 mm). Carapace 0.46/0.43 (1.07). Palps: trochanter 0.24/0.14 (1.71), femur 0.79/0.11 (7.18), patella 0.31/0.15 (2.06), chela 1.15/0.18 (6.39), movable finger length 0.70. Leg I: trochanter 0.15/0.11 (1.36), femur 0.42/0.06 (7.00), patella 0.22/0.05 (4.40), tibia 0.22/0.04 (5.50), tarsus 0.37/0.03 (12.3). Leg IV: trochanter 0.13/0.09 (1.44), femur 0.25/0.18 (1.39), patella 0.22/0.13 (1.69), femur/patella ratio 1.17, tibia 0.30/0.07 (4.28), basitarsus 0.16/0.05 (3.2), telotarsus 0.29/0.03 (9.67).</p><p>Ecological Remarks</p><p>Morena Cave is one of the largest in Minas Gerais, extending over 5 km and intersected by three watercourses that converge within it. The system includes a second cave, Gruta do Meio, located upstream and crossed by the main watercourse flowing through Morena Cave. Although the cave has multiple entrances, the largest one is the primary access point for visitors (Figs 9A–B).</p><p>Specimens of  P. urubuquaqua sp. nov. have been found throughout the cave, from watercourse galleries to higher levels, where they are rarely encountered. In the watercourse galleries, they are typically associated with sediment banks, sheltering beneath rocks (Fig. 9C). Despite their connection to watercourse conduits, they avoid direct contact with water, preferring higher sections of sediment banks. Their potential prey includes various springtail species and small arthropods like symphylans.</p><p>Although Morena Cave hosts several troglobitic species, most remain undescribed. Exceptions include the harvestman  Spinopilar moria Kury &amp; Pérez-González, 2008 and the highly troglomorphic palpigrade  Eukoenenia sagarana Souza &amp; Ferreira, 2012 . While not a tourist cave, Morena Cave attracts speleologists and casual visitors, leading to noticeable substrate compaction from excessive trampling. It is surrounded by secondary forest, though nearby pastures are used for cattle farming.</p><p>Given the threats faced by  P. urubuquaqua sp. nov. and other troglobitic species, immediate conservation action is needed. This cave represents one of the richest subterranean biodiversity sites in Minas Gerais, yet, like many ecologically significant caves in Brazil, it remains at risk (Ferreira et al. 2022).</p><p>Morena cave is one of the largest caves in Minas Gerais state. The cave presents several entrances, although the main entrance (the bigger) is the most used by visitors to access the cave (Figs 9A–B). The cave extends over 5 km of galleries and is intersected by three different watercourses that converge within it. The system also includes a second cave, Gruta do Meio cave, located upstream and crossed by the main watercourse that runs through the Morena cave. Specimens of  P. urubuquaqua sp. nov. have been found in various sections of the cave, from watercourse galleries to higher levels, where they are rarely encountered. In the watercourse galleries, they are often associated with sediment banks, typically sheltering beneath rocks (Fig. 9C). Although they are linked to watercourse conduits, they are never observed close to the water, instead preferring to take refuge in the higher parts of the sediment banks. Their potential prey includes a variety of springtail species and other small arthropods, such as symphylans. Although several cave-restricted species have been discovered in this cave, most remain undescribed, with a few exceptions, such as the troglobitic harvestman  Spinopilar moria Kury &amp; Pérez-González, 2008 and the highly troglomorphic palpigrade  Eukoenenia sagarana Souza &amp; Ferreira, 2012 .</p><p>Although Morena cave is not a tourist cave, it receives a significant number of visitors, particularly speleologists, as well as many casual visitors. Consequently, some of the cave’s substrates have become notably compacted due to excessive trampling. The cave is situated in an area covered by secondary forest, though nearby pastures are used for cattle farming.</p><p>It is crucial to recognize that this species, along with most troglobitic species in the cave, faces serious threats. Immediate action by a competent environmental agency is essential to protect this vital site of subterranean biodiversity, one of the richest caves in Minas Gerais for cave-restricted species. This need for action is underscored by the current situation in Brazil, where even ecologically significant caves are at risk of destruction (Ferreira et al. 2022).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/55343A7BFFDC0319FF00FEA7878FFE5C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Guimarães, Lucas;Prado, Guilherme C.;Ferreira, Rodrigo L.	Guimarães, Lucas, Prado, Guilherme C., Ferreira, Rodrigo L. (2025): Two new troglobitic species of Pseudochthonius Balzan, 1892 (Pseudoscorpiones, Chthoniidae) from Southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 5621 (1): 52-68, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5621.1.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5621.1.2
55343A7BFFD6031AFF00FB8282F3FD92.text	55343A7BFFD6031AFF00FB8282F3FD92.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudochthonius Balzan 1892	<div><p>Key to Brazilian  Pseudochthonius species</p><p>1 Presence of a pair of eyes or eyespots in one or both sex...................................................... 2</p><p>- Eyes absent......................................................................................... 12</p><p>2 Carapace almost rectangular, with no or little constriction on the posterior margin.................................. 3</p><p>- Carapace calix shaped, with a strong constriction on the posterior margin....................................... 11</p><p>3 Presence of a pair of well-developed eyes.................................................................. 4</p><p>- Presence of a pair of eyespots or weak developed lens........................................................ 7</p><p>4 Epistome flat, almost absent............................................................  Pseudochthonius lundi</p><p>- Epistome projected, dentated or with accessory projections.................................................... 5</p><p>5 Chelal fixed finger with 18–23 acute teeth.................................................................. 6</p><p>- Chelal fixed finger with approximately 36 teeth.....................  Pseudochthonius itakuatiara Prado &amp; Ferreira 2024</p><p>6 Teeth of chelal fixed finger with heterodonty (more than one row of teeth)......  Pseudochthonius heterodentatus Hoff 1946</p><p>- Teeth of chelal fixed finger with homodonty (single row of teeth)........  Pseudochthonius homodentatus Chamberlin 1929</p><p>7 Teeth of chelal movable finger numerous, small, constricted and generally projected backwards....................... 8</p><p>- Teeth of chelal movable finger few, well-spaced, acute at the middle section and rounded at the base...............................................................................................  Pseudochthonius orthodactylus</p><p>8 Chelal movable finger with approximately 24 small, constricted and projected backwards teeth.............................................................................................  Pseudochthonius tuxeni Mahnert 1979</p><p>- Chelal movable finger bearing approximately 30 or more teeth................................................. 9</p><p>9 Movable chelal finger heterodentate (alternate dentition)..................  Pseudochthonius gracilimanus Mahnert, 2001</p><p>- Teeth of movable chelal finger within a single row.......................................................... 10</p><p>10 Slender chelae, presence of a cluster of about 6 small teeth at the tip of fixed finger.............  Pseudochthonius ricardoi</p><p>- Robust chelae, absence of cluster of small teeth at the tip of fixed finger..........  Pseudochthonius brasiliensis Beier, 1970</p><p>11 Rallum with 7 pinnate blades.........................  Pseudochthonius ramalho Assis, Schimonsky &amp; Bichuette, 2021</p><p>- Rallum with 9 pinnated blades......................................................  Pseudochthonius biseriatus</p><p>12 Trichobothrium et closer to it than to dx................................  Pseudochthonius pali Prado &amp; Ferreira, 2023</p><p>- Trichobothrium et closer to dx than to it.................................................................. 13</p><p>13 Trichobothrium ist closer to est than to esb (shown by the ratio of the trichobothria ist–est / ist–esb &lt;1.0..........................................................................  Pseudochthonius koinopoliteia Prado &amp; Ferreira, 2023</p><p>- Trichobothrium ist closer to esb than to est or halfway (shown by the ratio of the trichobothria ist–est / ist–esb&gt;= 1.0...... 14</p><p>14 Trichobothrium ist halfway between esb and est (shown by the ratio of the trichobothria ist–est / ist–esb = 1.0; body size larger than 2.0 mm;................................................  Pseudochthonius diamachi Prado &amp; Ferreira, 2023</p><p>- Ratio of the trichobothria ist–est / ist–esb different&gt; 1.0, body size shorter than 2.0 mm............................. 15</p><p>15 Most of the teeth of the chelal movable finger highly constrict and projected backwards............................ 16</p><p>- Most of the teeth of the chelal movable finger acute and sparse...........................  Pseudochthonius limettioides</p><p>16 Approximately 26 teeth on movable chelal finger, trichobothrium ist three times closer to esb than est (shown by the trichobothrial ratio ist–est / ist–esb of 3.0)..........................................................  Pseudochthonius olegario</p><p>- Approximately 30 or more teeth on movable chelal finger, trichobothrial ratio ist–est / ist–esb less than 3.0............. 17</p><p>17 Rallum with 5 pinated blades...................  Pseudochthonius lubueno Assis, Schimonsky, Gallão &amp; Bichuette, 2023</p><p>- Rallum with 7 pinated blades........................................................................... 18</p><p>18 Movable chelal finger with 32 to 35 teeth................................................  P. maquinensis sp. nov.</p><p>- Movable chelal finger with between 36 and 40 teeth......................................................... 19</p><p>19 Body length ranging from 1.43 mm to 1.77 mm, with a trichobothrial ratio (ist–est / ist–esb) of 2.2..  P. urubuquaqua sp. nov.</p><p>- Trichobothrial ratio (ist–est / ist–esb) between 2.34–2.61 and body length ranging from 1,236 to 1,459 mm ..............................................................................  Pseudochthonius aware Prado &amp; Ferreira, 2024</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/55343A7BFFD6031AFF00FB8282F3FD92	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Guimarães, Lucas;Prado, Guilherme C.;Ferreira, Rodrigo L.	Guimarães, Lucas, Prado, Guilherme C., Ferreira, Rodrigo L. (2025): Two new troglobitic species of Pseudochthonius Balzan, 1892 (Pseudoscorpiones, Chthoniidae) from Southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 5621 (1): 52-68, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5621.1.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5621.1.2
