identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
72625E3E7BB951D78BF555B5325D1A33.text	72625E3E7BB951D78BF555B5325D1A33.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gerwasia amphidasydis Q. F. Zhang, Q. Z. Wu & Q. R. Li 2025	<div><p>Gerwasia amphidasydis Q. F. Zhang, Q. Z. Wu &amp; Q. R. Li sp. nov.</p><p>Fig. 2</p><p>Type.</p><p>China • Guizhou Province, Zunyi City, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=107.172775&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=28.211111" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 107.172775/lat 28.211111)">Kuangkuoshui Nature Reserve</a> (28°12'40"N, 107°10'22"E), 2227 m a. s. l., on leaves of  Rubus amphidasys . 1 November 2022, Q. Z. Wu and Q. F. Zhang (holotype GMB 4047, isotype KUN-HKAS 144247) ;</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The epithet refers to the host species,  Rubus amphidasys Focke ex Diels., from which the holotype was collected.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Spermogonia, Aecia, and Telia not found. Uredinia 0.2–0.8 mm diam. produced on the abaxial leaf surface, scattered to gregarious, hypophyllous, covered by peridium, small, rounded, light yellow, or orange-yellow. Urediniospores 29–41 × 22–29 μm (av. = 34 × 26 μm, n = 30), globose to subglobose or ovoid, golden, yellow-brown, wall 1.2–2.5 µm thick at sides, hyaline, prominent sparsely echinulate, markings elongated longitudinally, 1.3–3.1 µm in distance, pore obscure, germ pores inconspicuous. Pedicel broken; paraphyses not seen.</p><p>Additional material examined.</p><p>China • Guizhou Province, Zunyi City, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=107.1725&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=28.210556" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 107.1725/lat 28.210556)">Kuangkuoshui Nature Reserve</a>, (28°12'38"N, 107°10'21"E) 2214 m a. s. l., on the leaves of  Rubus amphidasys ( Rosaceae). 1 November 2022, Q. Z. Wu and Q. F. Zhang (GMB 4076)  .</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Gerwasia amphidasydis was the first species of  Gerwasia described on  Rubus amphidasys . Our phylogenetic analyses showed that  G. amphidasydis formed a separate branch (Fig. 1). Morphologically,  G. amphidasydis and  G. rubi exhibit similar spines. Moreover, the difference between  G. amphidasydis and  G. rubi is that the former has bigger urediniospores (29–41 × 22–29 μm vs. 22–33 × 16–26 µm) (Ito 1950; Hiratsuka et al. 1992).  Gerwasia amphidasydis and  G. guanganensis have similar uredinia and urediniospores; however,  G. guanganensis has longer spine distances compared to  G. amphidasydis (4.0–6.0 µm vs. 1.3–3.1 µm) (Zhao et al. 2021).  Gerwasia amphidasydis is distinguishable from  G. rubi-setchuenensise by having larger urediniospores (29–41 × 22–29 μm vs. 18–29 × 15–22 μm) and a thinner wall (1.2–2.5 µm vs. 2.1–3.2 μm) (Sun et al. 2024).</p><p>Additionally, the LSU sequences of  Gerwasia amphidasydis also differ from that of  G. rubi with 93.74 % similarity and from  G. rubi-setchuenensis with 90.56 % similarity. The ITS sequence for  Gerwasia rubi is not available in the NCBI database, whereas the ITS sequence similarity between  Gerwasia amphidasydis and  G. rubi-setchuenensis is 98.56 %.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/72625E3E7BB951D78BF555B5325D1A33	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Zhang, Qinfang;Wu, Qianzhen;Zhao, Peng;Habib, Kamran;Wang, Yao;Tang, Dexiang;Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz;Ren, Yulin;Shen, Xiangchun;Long, Qingde;Liu, Lili;Li, Qirui	Zhang, Qinfang, Wu, Qianzhen, Zhao, Peng, Habib, Kamran, Wang, Yao, Tang, Dexiang, Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz, Ren, Yulin, Shen, Xiangchun, Long, Qingde, Liu, Lili, Li, Qirui (2025): Unveiling new species of Phragmidiaceae (Basidiomycota, Pucciniales) on rosaceous plants from Guizhou, China. MycoKeys 115: 309-326, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.115.146604
0B748040F67A5F99A29D23FAA12DCB04.text	0B748040F67A5F99A29D23FAA12DCB04.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gerwasia rubi-setchuenensis J. E. Sun, Yong Wang bis & K. D. Hyde 2024	<div><p>Gerwasia rubi-setchuenensis J. E. Sun, Yong Wang bis &amp; K. D. Hyde, (2024)</p><p>Fig. 5</p><p>Host.</p><p>Rubus buergeri Miq.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Spermogonia, aecia, and telia unknown. Uredinia 0.4–1.0 mm diam., hypophyllous, pulverulent, golden, scattered, irregular, surrounded by host epidermis. Urediniospores 24–30 × 19–25 µm (av. = 27.2 × 22.3 µm, n = 30), subglobose or fusiform, inclusions golden or bright yellow; wall 1.4–2.9 µm thick (av. = 2.0 μm, n = 30), colorless, irregularly elongated verrucae.</p><p>Materials examined.</p><p>China • Guizhou Province, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=106.68972&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=28.827223" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 106.68972/lat 28.827223)">Zunyi City</a>, Xishui County (28°49'38"N, 106°41'23"E), 1223 m a. s. l., on the leaves of  Rubus buergeri Miq. ( Rosaceae), 3 November, 2022, Q. Z. Wu and Q. F. Zhang (GMB 4052) ;   China • Guizhou Province, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=106.40083&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=28.561943" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 106.40083/lat 28.561943)">Zunyi City</a>, Xishui County (28°33'43"N, 106°24'3"E), 1997 m a. s. l., on  Rubus buergeri ( Rosaceae), 3 November 2022, Q. Z. Wu and Q. F. Zhang (GMB 4075)  .</p><p>Notes.</p><p>In the phylogram (Fig. 1), our collections (GMB 4052 and GMB 4075) clustered with  G. rubi-setchuenensis (HGUP 21168). The morphological characteristics of our specimen are consistent with the original description of  G. rubi-setchuenensis, and the DNA sequence aligns with that of  G. rubi-setchuenensis HGUP 21168 (ITS 100 %; LSU 99.67 %) (Sun et al. 2024). The only difference observed between the descriptions and figure of  G. rubi-setchuenensis in Sun et al. (2024) is the size of the urediniospores. The urediniospores of  G. rubi-setchuenensis (GMB 4075) are slightly wider than those of  G. rubi-setchuenensis (HGUP 21168) (19–25 μm vs. 15–22 μm). This study identifies  Rubus buergeri as a new host for this fungus.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B748040F67A5F99A29D23FAA12DCB04	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Zhang, Qinfang;Wu, Qianzhen;Zhao, Peng;Habib, Kamran;Wang, Yao;Tang, Dexiang;Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz;Ren, Yulin;Shen, Xiangchun;Long, Qingde;Liu, Lili;Li, Qirui	Zhang, Qinfang, Wu, Qianzhen, Zhao, Peng, Habib, Kamran, Wang, Yao, Tang, Dexiang, Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz, Ren, Yulin, Shen, Xiangchun, Long, Qingde, Liu, Lili, Li, Qirui (2025): Unveiling new species of Phragmidiaceae (Basidiomycota, Pucciniales) on rosaceous plants from Guizhou, China. MycoKeys 115: 309-326, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.115.146604
0E3E9EE138C759E6A93F00A48BC63344.text	0E3E9EE138C759E6A93F00A48BC63344.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Phragmidium coreanicola Q. F. Zhang, Q. Z. Wu & Q. R. Li 2025	<div><p>Phragmidium coreanicola Q. F. Zhang, Q. Z. Wu &amp; Q. R. Li sp. nov.</p><p>Fig. 3</p><p>Type.</p><p>China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=106.625&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=26.380001" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 106.625/lat 26.380001)">Campus of Guizhou Medical University</a> (26°22'48"N, 106°37'30"E), 1911 m a. s. l., on leaves of  Rubus coreanus ( Rosaceae), 7 October 2021, Q. Z. Wu (holotype GMB 0101, isotype KUN-HKAS 144249)  .</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The epithet refers to the host species,  Rubus coreanus Miq. var. coreanus, from which the holotype was collected.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Spermogonia and Aecia not found. Uredinia 0.1–0.7 mm diam., produced on the abaxial leaf surface, scattered to gregarious, hypophyllous, yellow spots, scattered, irregular patches. Urediniospores 20–29 × 14–25 μm (av. = 24 × 21 μm, n = 30), globose to subglobose or broadly elliptical to ellipsoidal, wall 0.8–2.1 μm thick (av. = 1.4 μm, n = 30), inconspicuous or smooth at the base; inclusions orange-yellow or pale-yellow; germ pores 2–3, sub-equatorial. Telia 0.1–0.9 mm diam., hypophyllous, dark brown to black, clustered or scattered, bacilliform. Teliospores 107–167 × 25–35 μm (av. = 134 × 30 μm, n = 30), cylindrical, 5–7 cells, often 6, reddish-brown to opaque, rounded at the apex, rounded or somewhat attenuate at the base, not or slightly constricted at the septum, pedicels sub-hyaline, persistent, 47–96 × 12–19 μm (av. = 68 × 16 μm, n = 30), with a swollen base that gradually shows orange-yellow contents towards the lower end. Pedicel broken; paraphyses not seen.</p><p>Additional material examined.</p><p>China • Guizhou Province, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=106.47444&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=26.582779" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 106.47444/lat 26.582779)">Qingzhen City</a> (26°34'58"N, 106°28'28"E), 1972 m a. s. l., on leaves of  Rubus coreanus ( Rosaceae), 7 October 2021, Q. Z. Wu (GMB 4071)  .</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Phragmidium coreanicola formed a separate branch in our phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 1). Morphologically,  P. coreanicola differs from  P. griseum in having slightly wider urediniospores (14–25 μm vs. 13–21 μm) and larger teliospores (107–167 × 25–35 μm vs. 50–125 × 18–28 μm) (Liu et al. 2018). Additionally,  P. coreanicola is reported on  Rubus coreanus, whereas  P. griseum was found on  Rubus crataegifolius .  Phragmidium coreanicola differs from  P. cibanum, which is reported on  Rubus niveus, by having bigger urediniospores (20–29 × 14–25 μm vs. 17–20 × 18–19 μm) and larger teliospores (107–167 × 25–35 μm vs. 80–100 × 20–30 μm) (Wei 1988; Hiratsuka et al. 1992; Liu et al. 2018).  Phragmidium coreanicola has the same host species as  P. rubi-coreani in Guiyang City. However,  P. coreanicola has larger teliospores (107–167 × 25–35 μm vs. 29–74 × 14–37 µm) (Sun et al. 2022). The morphological comparison between  P. coreanicola and  P. pauciloculare shows that the uredinia of  P. coreanicola are larger than those of  P. pauciloculare (0.1–0.7 mm diam vs. 0.2–0.3 mm diam), and teliospores of  P. coreanicola are also larger than those of  P. pauciloculare (107–167 × 25–35 μm vs. 35–111 × 18–27 µm) (Wei 1988).</p><p>Furthermore, the ITS sequences of  P. coreanicola and  P. griseum exhibit significant differences, with a similarity of 87.33 %. However, the LSU sequences of  P. coreanicola and  P. griseum have little variation, sharing a similarity of 99.38 %.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0E3E9EE138C759E6A93F00A48BC63344	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Zhang, Qinfang;Wu, Qianzhen;Zhao, Peng;Habib, Kamran;Wang, Yao;Tang, Dexiang;Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz;Ren, Yulin;Shen, Xiangchun;Long, Qingde;Liu, Lili;Li, Qirui	Zhang, Qinfang, Wu, Qianzhen, Zhao, Peng, Habib, Kamran, Wang, Yao, Tang, Dexiang, Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz, Ren, Yulin, Shen, Xiangchun, Long, Qingde, Liu, Lili, Li, Qirui (2025): Unveiling new species of Phragmidiaceae (Basidiomycota, Pucciniales) on rosaceous plants from Guizhou, China. MycoKeys 115: 309-326, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.115.146604
751ADE418F22523A89071B2CB804FA77.text	751ADE418F22523A89071B2CB804FA77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Phragmidium parvifolius Q. F. Zhang, Q. Z. Wu & Q. R. Li 2025	<div><p>Phragmidium parvifolius Q. F. Zhang, Q. Z. Wu &amp; Q. R. Li sp. nov.</p><p>Fig. 4</p><p>Type.</p><p>China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City,  Huaxi District (26°43′27.3″N, 106°67′14.4″E), 1,114 m a. s. l., on leaves of  Rubus parvifolius ( Rosaceae), 3 November 2022, Q. Z. Wu and Q. F. Zhang (holotype GMB 4054, isotype KUN-HKAS 144250)  .</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The epithet refers to the host species,  Rubus parvifolius L., from which the holotype was collected.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Spermogonia, Aecia and Telia not found. Uredinia 0.3–0.8 mm diam., produced on the abaxial leaf surface, scattered to gregarious, hypophyllous, rounded to irregular, powdery, orange, pulverulent, at first covered by the epidermis, later, not surrounded by host epidermis; Urediniospores 18–32 × 12–24 μm (av. = 22 × 18 μm, n = 30), globose, oblong, orange, wall 1.1–1.7 μm thick (av. = 1.3 μm, n = 30) at sides, regularly echinulate with stout spines; germ pores 2–3, supra-equatorial. Paraphyses 49–83 × 10–19 μm (av. = 65 × 15 μm, n = 30), hyaline, curved.</p><p>Additional material examined.</p><p>China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City,  Huaxi District (26°43′59.7″N, 106°67′66.5″E), 1114 m a. s. l., on leaves of  Rubus parvifolius ( Rosaceae), 3 November 2022, Q. Z. Wu and Q. F. Zhang (GMB 4070)  .</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Phylogenetically,  P. parvifolius formed a sister branch to  P. barnardii Plowr. &amp; G. Winter (HGU 21035), which was also reported on  Rubus parvifolius (Fig. 1). Morphologically,  P. parvifolius can be easily differentiated from  P. barnardii by its larger urediniospores (18–32 × 12–24 μm vs. 16–19 × 15–18 µm) and larger paraphyses (49–83 × 10–19 μm vs. 26–39 × 10–13 µm) (Winter 1886; McTaggart et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2022). In terms of urediniospore size,  P. parvifolius is similar to  P. griseum (Dietel) Syd. However,  P. parvifolius differs from  P. griseum by having relatively larger paraphyses (49–83 × 10–19 μm vs. 34–70 × 7–16 μm) and by its host,  Rubus parvifolius vs.  Rubus crataegifolius (Wei 1988; Hiratsuka et al. 1992; Liu et al. 2018; Sun et al. 2024). Additionally,  P. parvifolius differs from  P. pauciloculare by its larger urediniospores (18–32 μm vs. 13–20 μm) (Wei 1988; Hiratsuka et al. 1992).  Phragmidium parvifolius and  P. kanas have the same urediniospores and paraphyses, but  P. parvifolius has no teliospores, whereas  P. kanas has them (Zhao et al. 2021).</p><p>Furthermore, the morphological comparison between  P. parvifolius and  P. coreanicola (this study) shows that the urediniospores of  P. parvifolius are larger than those of  P. coreanicola (18–32 μm vs. 20–29 μm), and  P. parvifolius has no teliospores, whereas  P. coreanicola has them. The ITS and LSU sequence similarities of  P. parvifolius with  P. coreanicola are 97.57 % and 99.22 %.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/751ADE418F22523A89071B2CB804FA77	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Zhang, Qinfang;Wu, Qianzhen;Zhao, Peng;Habib, Kamran;Wang, Yao;Tang, Dexiang;Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz;Ren, Yulin;Shen, Xiangchun;Long, Qingde;Liu, Lili;Li, Qirui	Zhang, Qinfang, Wu, Qianzhen, Zhao, Peng, Habib, Kamran, Wang, Yao, Tang, Dexiang, Ahmad, Muhammad AIjaz, Ren, Yulin, Shen, Xiangchun, Long, Qingde, Liu, Lili, Li, Qirui (2025): Unveiling new species of Phragmidiaceae (Basidiomycota, Pucciniales) on rosaceous plants from Guizhou, China. MycoKeys 115: 309-326, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.115.146604
