taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
A96F4B7CE961FFFDFDBBF95AFBD9F8F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16953591/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16953591	Figure 1. Diachronic view of old genera and subgenera described in Tydeinae. Only formal synonymies are indicated, not the new combinations of type species.	Figure 1. Diachronic view of old genera and subgenera described in Tydeinae. Only formal synonymies are indicated, not the new combinations of type species.	2025-03-21	André K, Henri M.		Zenodo	biologists	André K, Henri M.			
A96F4B7CE961FFFCFE61F88EFDCFFE93.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16953591/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16953591	Figure 1. Diachronic view of old genera and subgenera described in Tydeinae. Only formal synonymies are indicated, not the new combinations of type species.	Figure 1. Diachronic view of old genera and subgenera described in Tydeinae. Only formal synonymies are indicated, not the new combinations of type species.	2025-03-21	André K, Henri M.		Zenodo	biologists	André K, Henri M.			
A96F4B7CE96FFFF7FE7EFBACFD71F95D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16953595/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16953595	Figure 2. Cumulative genus description curves in Tydeidae, with and without corrections following subsequent synonymies and restorations. Description years are grouped by decade. White numbers in histogram indicate the number of genera listed in the publications indicated below. Asterisk refers to the estimation by Zhang et al. (2011). The last point represents an incomplete decade (2021-2023). Subgenera are not included.	Figure 2. Cumulative genus description curves in Tydeidae, with and without corrections following subsequent synonymies and restorations. Description years are grouped by decade. White numbers in histogram indicate the number of genera listed in the publications indicated below. Asterisk refers to the estimation by Zhang et al. (2011). The last point represents an incomplete decade (2021-2023). Subgenera are not included.	2025-03-21	André K, Henri M.		Zenodo	biologists	André K, Henri M.			
A96F4B7CE96FFFF7FE7EFBACFD71F95D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16953599/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16953599	Figure 4. Mean number of binomina of species according to the description year. Description years are grouped by decade. The last point represents an incomplete decade (2021-2023).	Figure 4. Mean number of binomina of species according to the description year. Description years are grouped by decade. The last point represents an incomplete decade (2021-2023).	2025-03-21	André K, Henri M.		Zenodo	biologists	André K, Henri M.			
A96F4B7CE96FFFF7FE7EFBACFD71F95D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16953603/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16953603	Figure 6. Classification (left) and evolution (phylogram of genitals, right) of the genus Brachytydeusand its subgenera. LCA: least com- mon ancestor; V: vertition; RDA: random developmental accident. Right scale: number of genitals on each hemibody from 6-6 to 2-2. The scenario retained postulates that (Quadrotydeus) forms a branch (Eotydeus)-(Quadrotydeus) arising from a common ancestor LCA and that (Eotydeus) arises from that branch. In another scenario, (Quadrotydeus) might be closer to (Brachytydeus) and forms a branch (Brachytydeus)- (Quadrotydeus) before which arises (Eotydeus). Either scenario is consistent with the classification proposed.	Figure 6. Classification (left) and evolution (phylogram of genitals, right) of the genus Brachytydeusand its subgenera. LCA: least com- mon ancestor; V: vertition; RDA: random developmental accident. Right scale: number of genitals on each hemibody from 6-6 to 2-2. The scenario retained postulates that (Quadrotydeus) forms a branch (Eotydeus)-(Quadrotydeus) arising from a common ancestor LCA and that (Eotydeus) arises from that branch. In another scenario, (Quadrotydeus) might be closer to (Brachytydeus) and forms a branch (Brachytydeus)- (Quadrotydeus) before which arises (Eotydeus). Either scenario is consistent with the classification proposed.	2025-03-21	André K, Henri M.		Zenodo	biologists	André K, Henri M.			
A96F4B7CE96FFFF7FE7EFBACFD71F95D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16953601/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16953601	Figure 5. From tridactyly to palpian evolution. A – Archetype; B – Tridactyly (André & N′Dri, 2013); C – Heterobidactly (Oudemans, 1925); D – Apotele fused (Kuznetsov, 1980); E – Homobidactyly (André, 2008, 2024); F – Monodactyly (Treat, 1970); G – Apotele vestigial (putative	Figure 5. From tridactyly to palpian evolution. A – Archetype; B – Tridactyly (André & N′Dri, 2013); C – Heterobidactly (Oudemans, 1925); D – Apotele fused (Kuznetsov, 1980); E – Homobidactyly (André, 2008, 2024); F – Monodactyly (Treat, 1970); G – Apotele vestigial (putative	2025-03-21	André K, Henri M.		Zenodo	biologists	André K, Henri M.			
