identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
CE4DD254FFE46E455CE743A3FE9D4A51.text	CE4DD254FFE46E455CE743A3FE9D4A51.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Messapus martini Simon 1898	<div><p>Messapus martini Simon, 1898</p><p>Messapus martini Simon, 1898: 214; Bosselaers &amp; Jocqué 2000: 307, figs 1A–H; Haddad 2013: 17, figs 1, 2, 27, 28, 34–38; Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: 387, figs 11–22.</p><p>Material examined. ESWATINI: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=31.716667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-26.8" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 31.716667/lat -26.8)">45 km SE of Manzini</a> [ca. 26°48’S, 31°43’E], 13.VI.1972, leg. E.S. Ross (quartz rocks), 1♀ (CAS, CASENT 9033203) .</p><p>Description. See Haddad (2013) for a description of both sexes.</p><p>Sequence data. Two female specimens from Ndumo Game Reserve in South Africa have been sequenced successfully for cytochrome oxidase subunit I, COI (NCA 2021 /247, SPIZA656-21; NMBA 18808, SPIZA1598- 23). A male from Ndumo and female from Ithala Game Reserve in South Africa were successfully sequenced for Ultraconserved Elements (UCE; Kelly et al. in press).</p><p>Distribution. Previously recorded from South Africa and Zambia. Recorded from Eswatini for the first time here (Fig. 1).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CE4DD254FFE46E455CE743A3FE9D4A51	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Haddad, Charles R.;Grismado, Cristian J.	Haddad, Charles R., Grismado, Cristian J. (2025): Further additions to the rare dark sac spider genus Messapus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Corinnidae). Zootaxa 5637 (2): 351-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8
CE4DD254FFE46E405CE74409FCDD4C73.text	CE4DD254FFE46E405CE74409FCDD4C73.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Messapus mygaloides Haddad & Grismado 2025	<div><p>Messapus mygaloides sp. nov.</p><p>Figures 2–26</p><p>Type material. Holotype ♀: TANZANIA: Tanganyika Region: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=35.666668&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-7.6666665" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 35.666668/lat -7.6666665)">6 mi. N of Iringa</a> [ca. 07°40’S, 35°40’E], 1475 m a.s.l., 16.XI.1957, leg. E.S. Ross &amp; R.E. Leech (CAS, TYPE21619, preparation CJG-2048).</p><p>Paratypes: MOZAMBIQUE: Manica Province: Majolele, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=33.7&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-18.983334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 33.7/lat -18.983334)">foot of Mount Sanga</a>, 18°59’S, 33°42’E, 565 m a.s.l., 19.XI.2016, leg. L. Geeraert &amp; M. Jocque (night, village), 1♂ (MRAC 247734) . TANZANIA: Ruvuma Region: Namswea, 10°28’09.9”S, 34°51’46.8”E, 14.XI.2023, leg. F.H. Pretorius (inside offices), 1♂ (NMBA 19155) .</p><p>Etymology. The species name refers to the massive, forward-protruding chelicerae in this species (notably in the female, Fig. 6), which resemble those of the spider infraorder Mygalomorphae .</p><p>Diagnosis. Messapus mygaloides sp. nov. is most similar to M. tigris Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015 in several respects, and the two species are probably closely related. Both species share a line of six or seven small arrowhead-shaped markings along the midline of the abdomen, which are unique in the genus (Figs 2, 5, 27; Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 1, 2, 8). The epigyne of M. mygaloides sp. nov. has the lateral ridges more widely separated, with angular anterior margins (vs. gently curved in M. tigris), and defining more distinct copulatory openings with the oval lateral lobes; the spermathecae are also massive, but differ by having anteromedian, nearly spherical pore-bearing receptacles and posteriorly directed median primary spermathecae, with coiled internal ducts, ending in an inconspicuous fertilization duct (cf. Figs 10–14 with Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 35, 49, 50). Males resemble those of M. tigris in palpal morphology, especially by the sickle-shaped dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis and the semicircular tegular apophysis retrodistally, but they differ by the embolus being broader, having a more prolateral origin, and by the tegulum lacking the additional thin spike-like prodistal tegular apophysis of M. tigris (cf. Figs 15–17 and 36–39).</p><p>Female (holotype, Iringa, CAS TYPE21619). Measurements: CL 3.40, CW 3.12, AL 5.25, AW 3.20, TL 8.40, SL 1.84, SW 1.88, CH 0.16, AME–AME 0.14, AME– ALE 0.06, ALE – ALE 0.64, PME–PME 0.26, PME–PLE 0.12, PLE–PLE 0.88, PERW 1.04, MOQAW 0.54, MOQPW 0.62, MOQL 0.60. Length of leg segments (sequence from femur to tarsus, and total): I 3.16 + 1.52 + 2.40 + 2.24 + 1.12 = 10.44; II 2.88 + 1.40 + 2.04 + 2.08 + 0.96 = 9.36; III 2.44 + 1.24 + 1.92 + 2.24 + 1.00 = 8.84; IV 3.76 + 1.48 + 3.12 + 3.52 + 1.20 = 13.08.</p><p>General appearance as in Figs 5–9. Carapace (in ethanol) yellow-brown, paler laterally and posteromedially, with broad mediolateral, sinuose brown markings, brown marking in front of fovea, and two forwardly diverging bands of silver-white feathery setae. All eyes surrounded by black rings; AER slightly procurved; AME larger than ALE; PER slightly procurved; PME slightly larger than PLE. Chelicerae orange-brown, lighter on the anteromedian margins and on the condyles, with dark brown setae on paturon; cheliceral promarginal pronounced mound present; promargin with four teeth, proximal tooth largest; retromargin with five teeth, proximal largest, separate from remaining teeth that are adjacent and subequal. Endites creamy-brown, cream distally; serrula distinct; labium yellow-brown, cream distally; sternum shield-shaped, broader than long, uniform yellow-brown, with scattered straight brown setae. Legs creamy-yellow, distal segments slightly darker; markings covered in dark squamose setae with brachia, except tarsi, covered in feathery setae; femora with broad dark band at 2/3 their length, scattered small dark spots in proximal half; patellae with dark proximal half; tibiae and metatarsi with broad median dark band and faint narrow distal ring; tarsi uniformly dark, without markings. Leg spination: femora: I pl 1 do 3, II pl 1 do 2, III pl 2 do 3 rl 2, IV do 2 rl 1; tibiae: I and II spineless, III pl 2 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 1 vt 2, IV pl 2 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 0-1 vt 2; metatarsi: I vt 3, II rl 1 rlv 2 vt 3, III pl 1 rl 1 rlv 2 vt 1, IV pl 1 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 3. Palp: femora: do 3; patellae: pl 1. Abdomen brown dorsally and laterally, with light, narrow arrowhead-shaped chevrons dorsally and light scattered patches laterally (denser near venter); brown areas covered in dark squamose setae with brachia, with scattered elongate striate scales between them; venter cream, covered in short straight brown setae and cream feathery setae and squamose setae with brachia. Epigyne with widely separated lateral ridges with angular anterior margins, separated by twice their width, with copulatory openings between them and internal oval lateral lobes (Figs 10, 12); copulatory ducts short, entering massive ST II on their anterior margin; ST II directed posterolaterally, with nearly spherical field of pore-bearing receptacles anteromedially near their base (Figs 11, 13), internal ducts coiled, leading into posteriorly directed median ST I, ending in inconspicuous fertilization duct posterolaterally (Figs 13, 14).</p><p>Male (paratype, Namswea, NMBA 19155). Measurements: CL 3.90, CW 3.30, AL 4.85, AW 2.85, TL 8.28, SL 1.98, SW 1.96, CH 0.19, AME–AME 0.10, AME– ALE 0.03, ALE – ALE 0.65, PME–PME 0.22, PME–PLE 0.16, PLE–PLE 0.95, PERW 1.22, MOQAW 0.61, MOQPW 0.65, MOQL 0.67. Length of leg segments (sequence from femur to tarsus, and total): I 3.20 + 1.30 + 2.56 + 2.40 + 1.25 = 10.71; II 2.97 + 1.46 + 2.19 + 2.23 + 1.15 = 10.00; III 2.80 + 1.31 + 2.02 + 2.25 + 1.15 = 9.53; IV 3.95 + 1.63 + 3.18 + 3.61 + 1.38 = 13.75.</p><p>General appearance as in Figs 2–4, 18–22; carapace (in ethanol) deep wine red, with black mottling, with creamy-grey markings in front of fovea, on sides of eye region and undulating along lateral margins. All eyes surrounded by black rings; AER slightly procurved; AME larger than ALE; PER slightly procurved; PLE slightly larger than PME. Chelicerae wine red, lighter on anteromedian margins and condyles, with dark brown setae on paturon; cheliceral promarginal pronounced mound present; promargin with three teeth, decreasing in size distally, proximal tooth largest, slightly separate from median tooth, median and distal teeth adjacent; retromargin with five teeth, proximal largest, slightly separated from second tooth, third to fifth teeth subequal and on common base. Endites and labium orange-brown, paler towards inner margins, cream distally; serrula distinct; endites depressed laterally, labium semi-circular, with basolateral depressions; sternum shield-shaped, as broad as long, orange, with darker margins and dense black mottling. Coxae and trochanters all deep yellow, with black mottling; femora yellow, darker distally; patellae to tarsi deep yellow-orange, with black mottling; all tibiae and metatarsi with broad black median band and proximal and distal creamy-grey rings, tarsi with broad median black band only. Leg spination: femora: I pl 1 do 3-4, II pl 1 do 2, III pl 2 do 3 rl 1, IV pl 1 do 2; all patellae with single fine dorsal distal seta; tibiae: I plv 3 rlv 3 very short spinules, II spineless, III pl 2 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 1 vt 2, IV pl 2 rl 2 plv 2 vt 2; metatarsi: I rlv 2 vt 3, II rlv 1 vt 3, III pl 1 rl 1 plv 1 rlv 2 vt 3, IV pl 1 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 3. Palpal spination: femora pl 1 do 2, patellae pl 1, tibiae pl 1 plv 1, tarsi plv 1. Abdomen dark brown, almost black dorsally, with narrow cream arrowhead-shaped chevron markings along midline (setae abraded in posterior half following preservation, cf. Figs 2 and 18) and light scattered patches laterally; dorsal scutum bright orange, extending just past midpoint of dorsum; brown areas covered in dark elongate striate scales and squamose setae with brachia; venter cream, covered in short straight setae and squamose setae with brachia. Male palpal femora and patellae yellow, tibiae and tarsi deep orange-brown; tibia with short subrectangular prolateral apophysis (Figs 15, 23), longitudinal ventral depression (Figs 16, 24), finger-like ventral RTA with pointed tip and large sickle-shaped dorsal RTA with sharp, distally directed tip (Figs 17, 25, 26); tegulum oval, with complex sperm duct with numerous loops, leading to broad, flattened embolus originating prolaterally distally, curving towards retrolateral side; broad semicircular tegular apophysis at distal end of tegulum; conductor absent (Figs 16, 24).</p><p>Variation. The paratype male from Mozambique has a total length of 7.70.</p><p>Sequence data. The paratype male from Namswea sequenced successfully for COI (NMBA 19155, SPIZA2084- 24).</p><p>Distribution. Although the female and male of this species have not yet been collected together, the two Tanzanian localities (Iringa and Namswea) are reasonably close together and would suggest they represent one species. Also collected from northwestern Mozambique (Fig. 1).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CE4DD254FFE46E405CE74409FCDD4C73	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Haddad, Charles R.;Grismado, Cristian J.	Haddad, Charles R., Grismado, Cristian J. (2025): Further additions to the rare dark sac spider genus Messapus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Corinnidae). Zootaxa 5637 (2): 351-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8
CE4DD254FFE16E4F5CE7479FFDD24F60.text	CE4DD254FFE16E4F5CE7479FFDD24F60.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Messapus tigris Haddad & Mbo 2015	<div><p>Messapus tigris Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>Figs 27–39</p><p>Messapus tigris Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015: 395, figs 1–3, 8, 23–31, 35, 49–50.</p><p>Material examined. BOTSWANA: Ngamiland: Okavango Delta, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=21.896183&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-18.430367" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 21.896183/lat -18.430367)">Near Shakawe, Lesideng Research Camp</a>, 18°25.822’S, 21°53.771’E, 26.XI.2006, leg. C. Haddad (on reed fence at night), 2♂ (MACN-Ar 12953, 12956); same data, 4♀ (MACN-Ar 12952, 12954, 12955, 12957) . ZIMBABWE: Matabeleland North: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=28.033333&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-19.933332" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 28.033333/lat -19.933332)">St James Mission</a>, 19°56’S, 28°02’E, XII.1995, leg. S. Wilson, 1♂ (NMZ/A14555) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Females can be distinguished from congeners by the broad epigyne with two obliquely orientated incomplete oval ridges that are directed posterolaterally (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 35, 49). Males share with M. mygaloides sp. nov. the sickle-shaped RTA in lateral view but can be distinguished by the thin spike-like prodistal tegular apophysis (in addition to the shared semicircular retrodistal tegular apophysis) and the short, flattened, mediodistally placed embolus (cf. Figs 32–39).</p><p>Female. See Haddad &amp; Mbo (2015) for description.</p><p>Male (Lesideng, MACN-Ar 12953). Measurements: CL 3.36, CW 2.92, AL 3.92, AW 2.68, TL 7.11, SL 1.60, SW 1.72, CH 0.20, AME–AME 0.10, AME–ALE 0.08, ALE–ALE 0.66, PME–PME 0.22, PME–PLE 0.16, PLE– PLE 0.90, PERW 1.10, MOQAW 0.56, MOQPW 0.56, MOQL 0.54. Length of leg segments (sequence from femur to tarsus, and total): I 3.12 + 1.36 + 2.44 + 2.00 + 1.08 = 10.00; II 2.68 + 1.28 + 1.96 + 1.76 + 1.04 = 8.72; III 2.40 + 1.20 + 1.80 + 2.04 + 1.04 = 8.48; IV 3.40 + 1.52 + 2.72 + 3.08 + 1.20 = 11.92. General appearance as in Figs 27– 30; colouration, markings and cheliceral morphology as for female, except the following: chelicerae dark brown, labium dark brown with cream anterior margin; and presence of a reddish-brown dorsal scutum on the abdomen. Leg spination: femora: I pl 1 do 2, II pl 1 do 2, III pl 2 do 3 rl 2, IV do 2 rl 1; tibiae: I rlv 1, II spineless, III pl 2 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 2, IV pl 1 rl 2 plv 2 vt 2; metatarsi: I plv 2 rlv 1 vt 2, II plv 1 rlv 1 vt 2, III pl 1 rl 1 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 3, IV pl 1 rl 1 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 3. Palpal spination: femora do 2, patellae pl 1, tibiae plv 1. Male palp with femur and patella light yellow, tibia and cymbium brown; tibia with short finger-like prolateral apophysis (Figs 31, 36), longitudinal ventral depression (Figs 32, 37), finger-like ventral RTA (variable in length, Figs 32–35, 37–39) and large sickle-shaped dorsal RTA with sharp, distally directed tip (Figs 33–35, 39); tegulum oval, with complex sperm duct with numerous loops, leading to short, narrow, flattened embolus originating mediodistally on tegulum, directed retrodistally; broad semicircular tegular apophysis at distal end of tegulum retrolaterally, with additional spike-like tegular apophysis prodistally; conductor absent (Figs 32, 37).</p><p>Variation. The male MACN-Ar 12956 from the type locality has a total length of 7.43, whereas the male from Zimbabwe has a total length of 8.38.</p><p>Sequence data. A male and female from Lesideng Research Camp in Botswana were successfully sequenced for Ultraconserved Elements (UCE; Kelly et al. in press).</p><p>Distribution. Known from the Okavango Delta in Botswana, the Caprivi Strip in Namibia, and recorded from Zimbabwe for the first time here (Fig. 1).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CE4DD254FFE16E4F5CE7479FFDD24F60	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Haddad, Charles R.;Grismado, Cristian J.	Haddad, Charles R., Grismado, Cristian J. (2025): Further additions to the rare dark sac spider genus Messapus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Corinnidae). Zootaxa 5637 (2): 351-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8
CE4DD254FFEF6E4D5CE747CAFA284B47.text	CE4DD254FFEF6E4D5CE747CAFA284B47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Messapus Simon 1898	<div><p>Updated key to the species of Messapus</p><p>1. Males (males of M. meridionalis Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015 and M. seiugatus Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015 unknown).............. 2</p><p>- Females............................................................................................. 7</p><p>2. Palp with single elongate slender RTA; embolus very long, originating prolaterally, curving in broad arc distally and ending midway along the retrolateral margin of the tegulum (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 37, 38, 43, 44).................................................................................................. M. megae Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>- Palpal tibia with more than one apophysis; embolus shorter.................................................... 3</p><p>3. Palpal tibia bearing four retrolateral apophyses, dorsal RTA bifid; embolus short, needle-shaped, obliquely situated beneath sclerotised tegular apophysis (Haddad 2005: figs 4–6); large spiders,&gt; 11.7 mm in length........ M. natalis (Pocock, 1898)</p><p>- Palpal tibia bearing two or three retrolateral apophyses, dorsal RTA not bifid; embolus not hidden beneath tegular apophysis, slightly curved and flattened; medium to large spiders, &lt;10 mm in length......................................... 4</p><p>4. Palpal tibia with two apophyses; dorsal RTA massive, sickle-shaped in retrolateral view, as long as dorsal surface of tibia and approximately half the length of the cymbium (Figs 17, 39).................................................... 5</p><p>- Palpal tibia with three apophyses; dorsal RTA shorter, triangular (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: fig. 54) or hatchet-shaped (Haddad 2013: fig. 38), clearly shorter than dorsal surface of tibia and less than half the length of the cymbium.................. 6</p><p>5. Tegulum with distinct spike-like prodistal tegular apophysis; embolus originating mediodistally, axis directed approximately towards 1 o’clock (Figs 32, 37).................................................. M. tigris Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>- Tegulum without prodistal tegular apophysis; embolus originating prodistally, broad and flattened, slightly curved and transversely oriented (Figs 16, 24)...................................................... M. mygaloides sp. nov.</p><p>6. Dorsal RTA triangular, originating dorsally above two smaller teeth-like ventral apophyses (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 39, 40, 53, 54).................................................................... M. tropicus Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>- Dorsal RTA stout, hatchet-shaped, slightly curved ventrally in retrolateral view, originating dorsally above tongue-like ventral RTA, with small lobed apophysis between them proximally (Haddad 2013: figs 36, 37)............ M. martini Simon, 1898</p><p>7. Epigyne with horseshoe-shaped ridges; cheliceral promarginal pronounced mound absent............................ 8</p><p>- Epigyne with oval- or slit-shaped ridges; cheliceral promarginal pronounced mound present.......................... 9</p><p>8. Lateral margins of epigynal ridges almost parallel but converging slightly posteriorly, forming subrectangular atrium (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 33, 45); copulatory ducts longitudinal to epigynal axis; ST II without anterior pore-bearing receptacle (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: fig. 46)............................................. M. meridionalis Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>- Lateral margins of epigynal ridges broadening medially, forming diamond-shaped atrium (Haddad 2013: fig. 34); copulatory openings obliquely oriented to epigyne axis; ST II with anterior pore-bearing receptacle (Haddad 2013: fig. 35)............................................................................................ M. martini Simon, 1898</p><p>9. Epigyne ventrally with strongly sclerotized ridges forming complete ovals, directed anterolaterally along their axis....... 10</p><p>- Epigyne ventrally with ridges forming incomplete ovals or with curved ridges.................................... 11</p><p>10. Epigynal ridges touching medially (Haddad 2005: figs 1, 2); spermathecae linked by broad median U-shaped tube (Haddad 2005: fig. 3); large spiders,&gt; 15 mm in length........................................... M. natalis (Pocock, 1898)</p><p>- Epigynal ridges clearly separated (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: fig. 41); spermathecae not connected by broad median U-shaped tube, but projecting anterolaterally (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: fig. 42); small spiders, ca. 7 mm in length.................................................................................................. M. megae Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>11. Epigyne with two widely separated oblique incomplete oval ridges, with their anterior margins directed anteromesally; ST II large, suboval, situated laterally (Figs 12, 13; Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 35, 49, 50)............................... 12</p><p>- Epigyne with curved epigynal ridges, oriented more or less parallel to body axis; ST II either small, round and medially situated (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: fig. 48) or with large lateral extensions projecting posteriorly (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: fig. 52)...... 13</p><p>12. Epigynal ridges with distinct oval lateral lobe positioned posterior to lateral ridge (Figs 10, 12)..... M. mygaloides sp. nov.</p><p>- Epigynal ridges with narrow fringe along their anterior margin, without oval lateral lobe (Fig. 46; Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: fig. 49)......................................................................... M. tigris Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>13. Epigyne with small ridges, curved inwards, copulatory openings anteriorly in ridges (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 34, 47)............................................................................. M. seiugatus Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p><p>- Epigyne with large ridges, curved outwards, forming ovoid median atrium, with copulatory openings posteriorly in ridges (Haddad &amp; Mbo 2015: figs 36, 51)............................................. M. tropicus Haddad &amp; Mbo, 2015</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CE4DD254FFEF6E4D5CE747CAFA284B47	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Haddad, Charles R.;Grismado, Cristian J.	Haddad, Charles R., Grismado, Cristian J. (2025): Further additions to the rare dark sac spider genus Messapus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Corinnidae). Zootaxa 5637 (2): 351-362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.8
