taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
29E4A562B55A50F89EF44151CEA90FA4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468544	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure7	Figure 7. Coryneum lanciforme from Betula pendula. A, B. Habit of ascostromata on branch; C. Ostioles embedded in ascostroma in section; D. Transverse section through ascostroma; E. Longitudinal section through ascostroma; F. Asci; G. Ascospores. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 20 μm (F, G).	Figure 7. Coryneum lanciforme from Betula pendula. A, B. Habit of ascostromata on branch; C. Ostioles embedded in ascostroma in section; D. Transverse section through ascostroma; E. Longitudinal section through ascostroma; F. Asci; G. Ascospores. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 20 μm (F, G).	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
D28CB89EA953556DB23DD03FF0E3FDDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468547	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure10	Figure 10. Morphology of Cryptosporella betulae from Betula pendula. A – C. Habit of conidiomata on branch; D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F, G).	Figure 10. Morphology of Cryptosporella betulae from Betula pendula. A – C. Habit of conidiomata on branch; D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F, G).	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
D28CB89EA953556DB23DD03FF0E3FDDD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468542	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure5	Figure 5. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cryptosporella generated from combined ITS, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	Figure 5. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cryptosporella generated from combined ITS, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
F95D8FD2DE5D509F90BBAD2AA64D90E4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468548	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure11	Figure 11. Morphology of Cryptosporella tomentella from Betula microphylla. A, B. Habit of ascostromata on branch; C. Ostioles embedded in ascostroma in section; D. Transverse section through ascostroma; E. Longitudinal section through ascostroma; F – H. Asci; I. Ascospores. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 20 μm (F – I).	Figure 11. Morphology of Cryptosporella tomentella from Betula microphylla. A, B. Habit of ascostromata on branch; C. Ostioles embedded in ascostroma in section; D. Transverse section through ascostroma; E. Longitudinal section through ascostroma; F – H. Asci; I. Ascospores. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 20 μm (F – I).	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
F95D8FD2DE5D509F90BBAD2AA64D90E4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468542	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure5	Figure 5. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cryptosporella generated from combined ITS, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	Figure 5. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cryptosporella generated from combined ITS, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
1BD156863BA85FD288CB087023568051.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468545	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure8	Figure 8. Morphology of Cytospora altayensis from Betula pendula. A, B. Habit of conidiomata on branch; C, D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Conidia. Scale bars: 300 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F, G).	Figure 8. Morphology of Cytospora altayensis from Betula pendula. A, B. Habit of conidiomata on branch; C, D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Conidia. Scale bars: 300 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F, G).	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
1BD156863BA85FD288CB087023568051.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468541	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure4	Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cytospora pruinosa species complex generated from combined ITS, act, rpb 2, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cytospora pruinosa species complex generated from combined ITS, act, rpb 2, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
E961D39CA5AB5747837DD36724EF0440.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468540	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure3	Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cytospora chrysosperma species complex generated from combined ITS, act, rpb 2, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cytospora chrysosperma species complex generated from combined ITS, act, rpb 2, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
87199035F4C05EEAA7DA9C4EE1F1BA06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468546	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure9	Figure 9. Morphology of Cytospora tanaitica from Betula pendula. A, B. Habit of conidiomata on branch; C, D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F – G).	Figure 9. Morphology of Cytospora tanaitica from Betula pendula. A, B. Habit of conidiomata on branch; C, D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F – G).	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
87199035F4C05EEAA7DA9C4EE1F1BA06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468539	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure2	Figure 2. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cytospora ribis species complex generated from combined ITS, act, rpb 2, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	Figure 2. Maximum Likelihood tree of Cytospora ribis species complex generated from combined ITS, act, rpb 2, tef 1 and tub 2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.90 are demonstrated at the branches. Ex-type strains are marked in bold.	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
C9C91DB8752058019E1062B26F8694FF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468549	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure12	Figure 12. Morphology of Melanconis groenlandica from Betula tianchanica. A – C. Habit of conidiomata on branch; D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Alpha conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F, G).	Figure 12. Morphology of Melanconis groenlandica from Betula tianchanica. A – C. Habit of conidiomata on branch; D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Alpha conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F, G).	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
E69CA32E9D4B5DBFBEA1C92220D4C31B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1468550	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.125.169956.figure13	Figure 13. Morphology of Melanconis stilbostoma from Betula pendula. A – C. Habit of conidiomata on branch; D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Alpha conidia. H. Beta conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F – H).	Figure 13. Morphology of Melanconis stilbostoma from Betula pendula. A – C. Habit of conidiomata on branch; D. Transverse section through conidiomata; E. Longitudinal section through conidiomata; F. Conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; G. Alpha conidia. H. Beta conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B – E); 10 μm (F – H).	2025-11-18	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Caixia;Jiang, Ning;Liu, Chuli;Xu, ZiYan;Lu, Hailong;Ma, Rong			
