taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
CDA1866436CB5E3688624859A7BC6AAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345584	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure5	Figure 5. The heterospecificity of the three species in LCNP is well supported in the phylogenetic analysis, in which divergences started from ~ 41 Ma (Middle Eocene) to ~ 18 Ma (Early Miocene). The estimated divergence time of the COI gene of the different species of LCNP is represented by 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and the time is expressed in million years ago (Ma) (upper corner left). The Timetree was calculated using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method and has bootstrap values, divergence time estimates, and error bars (pink) representing 95 % CI (upper left). Species divergences in LCNP are highlighted in pale blue in the ML tree and network, and divergences (nodes) of species in LCNP are marked with red dots in the ML tree. The p-distance heatmap matrix (upper right) with genetic distances is expressed in percentage. The generated phylogenetic network of the same COI gene sequences of different Orphnaecus species and outgroups (lower right). The distribution map shows the locations of the analyzed sequences (lower left). Philippine relief map: © 2024 Mapsland.	Figure 5. The heterospecificity of the three species in LCNP is well supported in the phylogenetic analysis, in which divergences started from ~ 41 Ma (Middle Eocene) to ~ 18 Ma (Early Miocene). The estimated divergence time of the COI gene of the different species of LCNP is represented by 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and the time is expressed in million years ago (Ma) (upper corner left). The Timetree was calculated using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method and has bootstrap values, divergence time estimates, and error bars (pink) representing 95 % CI (upper left). Species divergences in LCNP are highlighted in pale blue in the ML tree and network, and divergences (nodes) of species in LCNP are marked with red dots in the ML tree. The p-distance heatmap matrix (upper right) with genetic distances is expressed in percentage. The generated phylogenetic network of the same COI gene sequences of different Orphnaecus species and outgroups (lower right). The distribution map shows the locations of the analyzed sequences (lower left). Philippine relief map: © 2024 Mapsland.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
CDA1866436CB5E3688624859A7BC6AAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345585	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure6	Figure 6. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., holotype ♂ A prosoma, dorsal view B ventral view C ocular tubercle, dorsal view D left chelicera, prolateral view E retrolateral view F cheliceral strikers, retrolateral view G lyra (stridulatory organ), on prolateral maxillary surface H largest stridulatory setae of lyra, prolateral view I dorsal view J smallest stridulatory seta on lyra, dorsal view K prolateral view.	Figure 6. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., holotype ♂ A prosoma, dorsal view B ventral view C ocular tubercle, dorsal view D left chelicera, prolateral view E retrolateral view F cheliceral strikers, retrolateral view G lyra (stridulatory organ), on prolateral maxillary surface H largest stridulatory setae of lyra, prolateral view I dorsal view J smallest stridulatory seta on lyra, dorsal view K prolateral view.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
CDA1866436CB5E3688624859A7BC6AAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345586	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure7	Figure 7. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., holotype ♂ pedipalp and palpal organ A left pedipalp, prolateral view, showing the dense palpal scale brush (arrow) B left palpal organ, prolateral view C retrolateral view D apical view E ventral view F tip of embolus, prolateral view. Abbreviations: PS = prolateral superior keel, PI = prolateral inferior keel, A = apical keel.	Figure 7. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., holotype ♂ pedipalp and palpal organ A left pedipalp, prolateral view, showing the dense palpal scale brush (arrow) B left palpal organ, prolateral view C retrolateral view D apical view E ventral view F tip of embolus, prolateral view. Abbreviations: PS = prolateral superior keel, PI = prolateral inferior keel, A = apical keel.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
CDA1866436CB5E3688624859A7BC6AAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345587	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure8	Figure 8. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype ♀ prosoma A prosoma, dorsal view B ventral view C ocular tubercle, dorsal view D right chelicera, prolateral view, E retrolateral view F intercheliceral setae on right prolateral chelicera G cheliceral strikers on right chelicera, retrolateral view H maxillary lyra (stridulatory organ), prolateral view.	Figure 8. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype ♀ prosoma A prosoma, dorsal view B ventral view C ocular tubercle, dorsal view D right chelicera, prolateral view, E retrolateral view F intercheliceral setae on right prolateral chelicera G cheliceral strikers on right chelicera, retrolateral view H maxillary lyra (stridulatory organ), prolateral view.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
CDA1866436CB5E3688624859A7BC6AAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345588	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure9	Figure 9. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype ♀ opisthosoma and genitalia A abdomen, dorsal view B magnified view of the setation on the dorsal abdomen showing two types of setae: tactile setae (TS) and scales (SC) C spermathecae, dorsal view.	Figure 9. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype ♀ opisthosoma and genitalia A abdomen, dorsal view B magnified view of the setation on the dorsal abdomen showing two types of setae: tactile setae (TS) and scales (SC) C spermathecae, dorsal view.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
4A5E6F24B03E5A80A7136D95D393A100.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345581	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure2	Figure 2. Dorsal habitus of theraphosid species of LCNP A Orphnaecus pellitus, female B mature male C Orphnaecus tangcongvaca sp. nov., holotype female D Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype female E holotype male. Note: Size on actual scale.	Figure 2. Dorsal habitus of theraphosid species of LCNP A Orphnaecus pellitus, female B mature male C Orphnaecus tangcongvaca sp. nov., holotype female D Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype female E holotype male. Note: Size on actual scale.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
4A5E6F24B03E5A80A7136D95D393A100.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345582	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure3	Figure 3. Anterior carapace of all known Orphnaecus species showing the comparison of ocular tubercles A, B O. pellitus, showing variation in eyes A ♂ UST-ARC 0055 B ♂ UST-ARC 0052 C O. libmanan sp. nov., holotype ♂ UST-ARC 0133 D O. tangcongvaca sp. nov., holotype ♀ UST-ARC 0142 E O. kwebaburdeos, paratype ♂ BPB 2112012-13 F O. adamsoni, holotype ♂ PNM 14889.	Figure 3. Anterior carapace of all known Orphnaecus species showing the comparison of ocular tubercles A, B O. pellitus, showing variation in eyes A ♂ UST-ARC 0055 B ♂ UST-ARC 0052 C O. libmanan sp. nov., holotype ♂ UST-ARC 0133 D O. tangcongvaca sp. nov., holotype ♀ UST-ARC 0142 E O. kwebaburdeos, paratype ♂ BPB 2112012-13 F O. adamsoni, holotype ♂ PNM 14889.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
4A5E6F24B03E5A80A7136D95D393A100.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345584	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure5	Figure 5. The heterospecificity of the three species in LCNP is well supported in the phylogenetic analysis, in which divergences started from ~ 41 Ma (Middle Eocene) to ~ 18 Ma (Early Miocene). The estimated divergence time of the COI gene of the different species of LCNP is represented by 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and the time is expressed in million years ago (Ma) (upper corner left). The Timetree was calculated using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method and has bootstrap values, divergence time estimates, and error bars (pink) representing 95 % CI (upper left). Species divergences in LCNP are highlighted in pale blue in the ML tree and network, and divergences (nodes) of species in LCNP are marked with red dots in the ML tree. The p-distance heatmap matrix (upper right) with genetic distances is expressed in percentage. The generated phylogenetic network of the same COI gene sequences of different Orphnaecus species and outgroups (lower right). The distribution map shows the locations of the analyzed sequences (lower left). Philippine relief map: © 2024 Mapsland.	Figure 5. The heterospecificity of the three species in LCNP is well supported in the phylogenetic analysis, in which divergences started from ~ 41 Ma (Middle Eocene) to ~ 18 Ma (Early Miocene). The estimated divergence time of the COI gene of the different species of LCNP is represented by 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and the time is expressed in million years ago (Ma) (upper corner left). The Timetree was calculated using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method and has bootstrap values, divergence time estimates, and error bars (pink) representing 95 % CI (upper left). Species divergences in LCNP are highlighted in pale blue in the ML tree and network, and divergences (nodes) of species in LCNP are marked with red dots in the ML tree. The p-distance heatmap matrix (upper right) with genetic distances is expressed in percentage. The generated phylogenetic network of the same COI gene sequences of different Orphnaecus species and outgroups (lower right). The distribution map shows the locations of the analyzed sequences (lower left). Philippine relief map: © 2024 Mapsland.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
4A5E6F24B03E5A80A7136D95D393A100.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345583	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure4	Figure 4. Eye indices (AME and ALE) of selected Orphnaecus species. Connecting lines denote the same individual. The ALE and AME diameter of O. pellitus are relatively smaller than its epigean and troglophile congeners and the ALE ≤ AME based on EI values. Note: Eye index is the ratio of the eye diameter of ALE or AME to the length of the carapace.	Figure 4. Eye indices (AME and ALE) of selected Orphnaecus species. Connecting lines denote the same individual. The ALE and AME diameter of O. pellitus are relatively smaller than its epigean and troglophile congeners and the ALE ≤ AME based on EI values. Note: Eye index is the ratio of the eye diameter of ALE or AME to the length of the carapace.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
35DC70D0BD30551A815AF58383D83436.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345588	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure9	Figure 9. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype ♀ opisthosoma and genitalia A abdomen, dorsal view B magnified view of the setation on the dorsal abdomen showing two types of setae: tactile setae (TS) and scales (SC) C spermathecae, dorsal view.	Figure 9. Orphnaecus libmanan sp. nov., paratype ♀ opisthosoma and genitalia A abdomen, dorsal view B magnified view of the setation on the dorsal abdomen showing two types of setae: tactile setae (TS) and scales (SC) C spermathecae, dorsal view.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
35DC70D0BD30551A815AF58383D83436.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1345589	https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.52.142334.figure10	Figure 10. Orphnaecus tangcongvaca sp. nov., holotype ♀ A habitus, dorsal view B prosoma, dorsal view C prosoma, ventral view D ocular tubercle, dorsal view E left chelicera, retrolateral view F left chelicera, prolateral view G cheliceral strikers at ventrolateral chelicerae H left maxilla prolateral surface showing a single stridulatory seta (arrow) I left maxilla, prolateral view J spermathecae, dorsal view.	Figure 10. Orphnaecus tangcongvaca sp. nov., holotype ♀ A habitus, dorsal view B prosoma, dorsal view C prosoma, ventral view D ocular tubercle, dorsal view E left chelicera, retrolateral view F left chelicera, prolateral view G cheliceral strikers at ventrolateral chelicerae H left maxilla prolateral surface showing a single stridulatory seta (arrow) I left maxilla, prolateral view J spermathecae, dorsal view.	2025-06-05	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.		Zenodo	biologists	Acuña, Darrell C.;Ragasa, Lorenz Rhuel P.;Santiago-Bautista, Myla R.;von Wirth, Volker;Guevarra Jr, Leonardo A.			
