Diguetinus raptator Roewer, 1912

(Figs 1A, B, E; 2A, B; 3A, B; 6 A-F; 7A-C; 8-9)

Diguetinus raptator Roewer, 1912: 271, pl. 1 fig. 25; 1923: 863, fig. 1030; 1956: 252. — Bronn 1932: 7, fig. 9b. — Di Caporiacco 1938: 280. — Goodnight & Goodnight 1942a: 15. — Weidner 1959: 121. — Cokendolpher & Lee 1993: 16. — Crawford 1992: 17. — Kury & Cokendolpher 2000: 150; 2020: 52. — Cokendolpher et al. 2021: 119, fig. 1-9.

TYPE DATA. — See Cokendolpher et al. (2021) .

MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Mexico • 6 ♂, 10 ♀; Jalisco: Guadalajara: Bosque El Centinela; 20°45’44.4”N, 103°22’51.1”W; 1584 m a.s.l.; 26.X.2023; D. Ochoa-Vázquez, O. I. Ochoa-Vázquez leg.; GenBank accession numbers: PV430733-36; CRLSM-OP_01; CNAN-OP2021 .

EMENDED DIAGNOSIS. — Diguetinus raptator can be distinguished from Diguetinus spinulatus stat. restit. by the combination of the following characters: a) dorsum with transverse rows of spines running across each tergite of the opisthosoma, not in a single row (as in Diguetinus spinulatus stat. restit.) but rather with random to at least two rows of spines per tergite; b) leg femur predominantly dark brown; c) glans length less than length of alae section, about 1/2 the length of alae; d) alae section proportion approximately 1/6 of the total length of the penis; e) alae section internal texture with a reticulate pattern, dark in colour, present over the entire alae surface.