Pepsis nanoides Vardy, 2005: 268

Paratypes: 1♀ (# MZSP 56488) ‘[Brazil], São Paulo, Rio Claro, Horto Florestal [Edmundo] Navarro de Andrade, 30.vi.[19]87, coletado no barranco, R.P. Martins, col.’ ‘ Paratype, ♀, Pepsis nanoides n. sp., Det. Vardy, 2001’; 1♀ (# MZSP 56489) ‘[Brazil], Pará, Belém, June, 1924’ ‘ F.X. Williams collector’ ‘ Paratype, ♀, Pepsis nanoides n. sp., Det.Vardy, 2001’; 1♀ (# MZSP 56490)‘[Brazil], E.[stado] de S.[ão] Paulo, 12.430 [Brazil, São Paulo, Jundiaí, 21.iv.1899, M. Beron col.], Pepsis dimidiata ’ ‘ Head Figured Specimen’ ‘ Paratype, ♀, Pepsis nanoides n. sp., Det. Vardy 2001’ ‘MZUSP’; 1♀ (# MZSP 56491)‘[Brazil], E[stado] S[ão] Paulo, Jundiahy [Jundiaí], ♀, 12.430[Brazil, São Paulo, Jundiaí, 21.iv.1899, M. Beron col.], Pepsis dimidiata ’ ‘ Coll antiga’ ‘ Pepsis dimidiata Fabr .’‘ Paratype, ♀, Pepsis nanoides n. sp., Det.Vardy,2001’‘MZUSP’; 1♀ (# MZSP 56492)‘ Brasil, S.[ão] P.[aulo], Itu, Faz.[enda] Pau D’Alho, ii.1963, F. Werner & U. Martins col.’‘ Pepsis dimidiata, Fabr., ♀, det. H. Evans 1967’ ‘ Pepsis dimidiata, Fabr .’‘ Paratype, ♀, Pepsis nanoides n. sp., det. Vardy 2001’.

Comments: The original publication listed the specimen from Belém (Brazil) (# MZSP 56489) as collected on May, but the correct date in the label is June.