Zygomolgus dentatus Kim I.H., 2006

Kim, Il-Hoi & Boxshall, Geoff A., 2021, Copepods associated with Ascidian hosts (Tunicata): Intramolgidae and Lichomolgidae, with descriptions of four new genera and 13 new species, Zootaxa 5013 (1), pp. 1-75 : 70-73

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5013.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BBB1CB11-1AEA-4678-8F6C-B43B7F35E453

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D4A87BF-FFFE-FFC6-FF19-FD979ED4FCAC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Zygomolgus dentatus Kim I.H., 2006
status

 

Zygomolgus dentatus Kim I.H., 2006

( Figs. 43 View FIGURE 43 , 44 View FIGURE 44 )

Material examined. 1 ♀ (MNHN-IU-2014-21495, dissected) from a compound ascidian aẚplosoma lẚsterẚanum (Milne Edwards, 1841) MNHN-IT-2008-3533 (= MNHN A2 About MNHN /DIP.A/30): Port de Sète , Mediterranean coast of France, Monniot coll., 12 March 1984 .

Supplementary description of female. Body ( Fig. 43A View FIGURE 43 ) with broad prosome and narrow urosome; body length 1.67 mm; prosome 1.11 mm long, strongly tapering posteriorly. Cephalothorax markedly expanded, globular, 735×815 μm. Urosome ( Fig. 43B View FIGURE 43 ) 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite 175 μm wide; genital double-somite as long as wide (190×190 μm), with slightly broadened anterior half; genital apertures positioned dorsolaterally at mi- dlength of double-somite. Three free abdominal somites 48×101, 38×88, and 84×95 μm, respectively; anal somite with 4 or 5 denticles each side on posteroventral margin ( Fig. 43C View FIGURE 43 ). Caudal ramus ( Fig. 43C View FIGURE 43 ) about 4.3 times longer than wide (156×36 μm) and 1.86 times longer than anal somite, and ornamented with 4 denticles on posteroventral margin; armed with 6 naked setae, lateral seta positioned slightly distal to midlength of ramus.

Rostrum ( Fig. 43D View FIGURE 43 ) distinct, nearly semicircular. Antennule ( Fig. 43E View FIGURE 43 ) 336 μm long, 7-segmented; armature formula 4, 13, 6, 3, 4+aesthetasc, 2+aesthetasc, and 7+aesthetasc (deduced from setae and their insertion scars). Antenna ( Fig. 43F View FIGURE 43 ) 4-segmented, with armature formula 1, 1, 2+claw, and 3+4 claws; terminal segment about 2.6 times longer than wide (75×29 μm); claw on third segment (second endopodal segment) rather strong, annulated; four terminal claws unequal in length and thickness, outermost claw longest, slender and setiform.

Labrum ( Fig. 43G View FIGURE 43 ) with broad median incision and tapering posterolateral lobes fringed with membrane; midposterior margin with row of fine spinules. Mandible ( Fig. 43H View FIGURE 43 ) with elongate distal lash bearing densely arranged spinules along both margins and 3 digitiform processes (scales) on convex outer side of blade. Maxillule ( Fig. 43I View FIGURE 43 ) distally with 2 broad spiniform setae, 1 shorter spiniform process, and 1 small seta. Maxilla ( Fig. 43J, K View FIGURE 43 ) consisting of broad, unarmed syncoxa and basis; basis with elongate distal lash and 3 setae; distal lash with 3 thick spines proximally, followed by row of spinules on outer margin; inner seta (seta I) large, slightly shorter than distal lash, spinulose along both margins; anterior seta (seta II) simple; outer proximal seta (seta III) minute. Maxilliped ( Fig. 44A View FIGURE 44 ) 3-segmented; first segment unarmed; second segment with 2 small setae and produced into claw-like process at outer distal corner (indicated by arrowhead in Fig. 44A View FIGURE 44 ); small terminal segment claw-like, with 1 minute seta proximally.

Legs 1, 2 ( Fig. 44B, C View FIGURE 44 ) and 3 with 3-segmented rami. Leg 4 ( Fig. 44E View FIGURE 44 ) with 3-segmented exopod and 2-segmented endopod. Outer seta on basis of legs 1-4 and inner coxal seta of leg 4 small and naked, other setae pinnate. Third exopodal segment of leg 2 with bifid distal process (indicated by arrowhead in Fig. 44C View FIGURE 44 ). Leg 3 same as leg 2, except third endopodal segment armed with 3 spines and 2 setae ( Fig. 44D View FIGURE 44 ). Leg 4 endopod less than half length of exopod; distal endopodal segment twice as long as wide (55×24 μm), armed with 2 distal spines 35 μm (outer) and 52 μm long (inner). Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows (same as in iẚchomolgus):

Coxa Basis Exopod Endopod

Leg 1: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; III, I, 4 0-1; 0-1; I, 1, 4

Leg 2: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; III, I, 5 0-1; 0-1; I, II, 3

Leg 3: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; III, I, 5 0-1; 0-1; I, II, 2

Leg 4: 0-1 1-0 I-0; I-1; II, I, 5 0-1; 0, II, 0

Leg 5 ( Fig. 43B View FIGURE 43 ) consisting of dorsolateral seta on surface of somite and free exopodal segment; exopod ( Fig. 44F View FIGURE 44 ) about 1.9 times longer than wide (34×18 μm), with convex outer margin, pointed inner distal corner; armed distally with 1 bilaterally serrate spine (33 μm long) and 1 naked seta (38 μm long). Leg 6 ( Fig. 44G View FIGURE 44 ) represented by 2 naked setae and 1 denticle on genital operculum.

Male. Not found.

Remarks. Although the caudal ramus of our examined specimen is 4.33 times longer than wide, which differs from the 5.6 times in the type material of ZK dentatus known from Korea (Kim, I.H., 2006), our Mediterranean specimen is identified as Z. dentatus . The type material and our Mediterranean specimen share numerous specific morphological features, including the three proximal scales on the distal lash of the maxilla, the recurved, claw-like distal process on the second segment of the maxilliped, and the bifid terminal process on the third exopodal segment of leg 2, which suggest that they are conspecific. The host ascidian aẚplosoma lẚsterẚanum is a cosmopolitan species, whose known distribution includes the Atlantic, Mediterranean and North Pacific, and it is possible that ZK dentatus can be found in association with this host across its geographical range.

Gotto (1955) recorded Zygomolgus tenu ẚfurcatus as an associate of the ascidian aẚplosoma lẚsterẚanum in Northern Ireland. Although our specimen from the Mediterranean was obtained from the same ascidian host, it cannot be identified as Z. tenu ẚfurcatus, because, according to the original description ( Sars, 1917), its caudal ramus is more elongate (more than twice as long as the anal somite), and none of the above-mentioned diagnostic features of Z. dentatus is observable in his illustrations.

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF