Ulmus series Crassifoliae C.K.Schneid., Pl. Wilson.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13695569 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AE022-4C47-FFB0-FF10-F8F0FE0FFEE7 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Ulmus series Crassifoliae C.K.Schneid., Pl. Wilson. |
| status |
|
Ulmus series Crassifoliae C.K.Schneid., Pl. Wilson. (Sargent) 3: 264. 1917
Holotype:— Ulmus crassifolia Nutt.
Notes:— Schneider (1917) attributed the name to Schneider (1916), but the name does not appear there. Ulmus crassifolia is the only species cited in the protologue.
Ulmus section Dryoptelea Spach, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2. 15: 361. 1841, nom. illeg. ≡ Ulmus subgenus Dryoptelea (Spach) Planch., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 3. 10: 260. 1848, nom. illeg.
Notes:—This name is superfluous since the protologue of this section included the generitype, Ulmus campestris , in synonymy (Art. 52.1 of the ICN).
| ICN |
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.