Tomosvaryella ellipiensis Motamedinia & Skevington
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5002.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5DC2A66A-3F04-42D0-8A8C-F0686054E556 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5122563 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A887D0-5F58-FF92-FF3E-EBD5FE8C4B4D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tomosvaryella ellipiensis Motamedinia & Skevington |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tomosvaryella ellipiensis Motamedinia & Skevington View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 12A–D View FIGURE 12 , 53 View FIGURE 53 , 66E View FIGURE 66 –F
Diagnosis: This species can be recognized by the shape of epandrium in dorsal view, expanded towards the left side ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ); small surstyli with a ventromedial projection in lateral view ( Fig. 12C–D View FIGURE 12 ); phallic guide curved towards surstyli, with a pair of dorsolateral spines in lateral view ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ).
Description: MALE: Body length (excluding antennae): 2.6 mm. Head. Scape, pedicel, arista dark brown, flagellum brown; scape and pedicel without setae; flagellum tapering (LF: WF = 3.0). Eyes meeting for a distance of 7–8 facets. Frons silver-gray pollinose. Vertex black, lacking pollinosity. Occiput dark and gray pollinose. Thorax. Postpronotal lobe light yellow, gray pollinose with 2–3 small pale setae along the upper margin (up to 0.02 mm). Prescutum and scutum black, with uniseriate rows of intra-alar setae. Scutellum black, silver-gray pollinose, without bristle. Subscutellum and pleura dark brown, gray pollinose. Wing. Length: 2.5 mm. LW:MWW = 2.6. Wing almost entirely covered with microtrichia. Cross-vein r-m reaching cell dm at the middle. M 1 strongly undulating in middle. Halter length: 0.28 mm. Whitish, narrowly light brown at base. Legs. Dark brown but narrowly yellow at base of tibiae and all tarsal segments except distitarsi. Trochanters smooth. Femora partly gray pollinose, hind femur shining in posterior. Hind femur bearing two rows of dark, peg-like anteroventral spines in apical one third. Fore, mid and hind femora with 1–2 wrinkled indentations in basal quarter. Tibiae with two rows of short setae on anterior and three rows on posterior side. Hind tibia with 1–2 wrinkled indentations in the middle. Tarsi light brown, gray pollinose. Pulvilli shorter than distitarsi. Claws white with black tips. Abdomen. Ground color dark brown. Tergite 1 entirely gray pollinose with 3–4 yellowish short lateral setae (up to 0.05 mm). Tergites 1–5 with scattered yellowish setae (up to 0.05 mm). Sternites brown laterally and dark centrally, gray pollinose. Genitalia. Genital capsule in dorsal view: epandrium and surstyli brown, gray pollinose. Epandrium wider than long (MLE:MWE = 0.5), expanded towards left side ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ). Surstyli small, rather symmetrical, triangular-shaped, slightly curved to each other at apex ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ). Genital capsule in ventral view: gonopods large and slightly equal in height, subepandrial sclerite wide basically ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ). Genital capsule in lateral view: both surstyli small with ventromedial projection (12 C–D); phallic guide broad at base, curved towards surstyli, with two small dorsolateral spines at basal half ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); phallus with three small ejaculatory ducts, one broader than other ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ). FEMALE: unknown.
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to Ellipi, the historical name of Kermanshah, from where the holotype has been collected.
Specimen examined: HOLOTYPE: IRAN: Kermanshah: Gheshlagh , 34°56’N, 46°27’E, 1533 m a.s.l., 1.vii.2015, M. Zardouei, Malaise trap, JSS51945 (1♂, CNC). GoogleMaps
Distribution: Iran ( Fig. 53 View FIGURE 53 ).
Note: Based on DNA barcodes, T. ellipiensis sp. nov. is genetically most similar to T. teligera (5.6% pairwise divergence).
CNC |
Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |