Tinytrema bondi, PLATNICK, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2002)271<0001:AROTAG>2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EAE52A-FFE7-A61B-801E-2728DAE24BB2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Tinytrema bondi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tinytrema bondi , new species Figures 151 View Figs , 165–168 View Figs ; Map 11 View Map 11
TYPE: Male holotype from Bondi State Forest , 37 ° 07 ̍ S, 149 ° 08 ̍ E, New South Wales (Nov. 28, 1980; G. Gowing), deposited in AMS (KS69129) .
ETYMOLOGY: The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
DIAGNOSIS: Males can easily be recognized by the retrolaterally directed prong situated at about half the length of the retrolateral tibial apophysis (figs. 165, 166), females by the narrow, convoluted epigynal ducts (figs. 167, 168).
MALE: Total length 2.8. Carapace dark chestnut brown, abdominal dorsum dark gray with pair of transverse white marks at about half of length and third white mark above spinnerets, paired marks extending around sides to venter; anterior legs with coxae and trochanters light brown, femora and patellae dark brown, distal segments orange, posterior legs with coxae and trochanters white, remaining segments as in anterior legs. Leg spination typical for genus. Retrolateral tibial apophysis enormous, longer than tibia itself, basal portion directed dorsally, distal portion directed ventrally, bearing retrolateral prong at base (fig. 166), embolus situated medially, short, with curved tip (fig. 165).
FEMALE: Total length 3.5. Coloration as in male. Leg spination typical for genus. Epigynum with bipartite anterior margin (fig. 167), ducts narrow, convoluted, anterior portion cshaped (fig. 168).
OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED: Tasmania: Woodsdale, 42 ° 28 ̍ S, 147 ° 34 ̍ E, Feb. 7, 1986, pitfall (R. Bashford, FCTH 162 View Materials ), 1♀. Victoria: Airey’s Inlet , 38 ° 28 ̍ S, 144 ° 06 ̍ E, May 13–14, 1992, under eucalypt bark (M. Harvey, M. Blosfelds, WAM 99 About WAM /633, 634), 2♀ ; Cobon South Coupe , 37 ° 25 ̍ S, 148 ° 56 ̍ E, Feb. 19–26, 1992, pitfall (R. Coy, NMV K3592 About NMV ), 13 ; Coranderrk Reserve , Heales ville, 37 ° 39 ̍ S, 145 ° 31 ̍ E, Mar. 4–5, 1980, un der bark of Eucalyptus viminalis (M. Harvey, ANIC) , 2♀ (with ant models), Feb. 24, 1981 (M. Harvey, ANIC), 1♀ ; Lerderberg River, 3.8 km WNW Blackwood , 37 ° 29 ̍ S, 144 ° 20 ̍ E, Sept. 13, 1982, under bark of Eucalyptus rubida (M. Harvey, ANIC) , 13 ; Separation Creek , 38 ° 38 ̍ S, 143 ° 54 ̍ E, Aug. 28, 1988, under eucalypt bark (M. Harvey, M. Blosfelds, WAM 99 About WAM /632), 1♀, Sept. 19– 21, 1989 ; under eucalypt bark (M. Harvey, M. Blosfelds, WAM 99 About WAM /635–641), 53, 2♀ ; Werribee River , 15 km NNW Ballan, 37 ° 36 ̍ S, 144 ° 15 ̍ E, Sept. 13, 1982, under bark of Eucalyptus rubida (M. Harvey, ANIC) , 1♀ .
DISTRIBUTION: Southeastern Australia, including Tasmania (map 11).
Tinytrema kangaroo , new species Figures 169–172 View Figs
TYPES: Male holotype and female allotype taken under bark of Eucalyptus rubida at Kangaroo Ground, 37 ° 41 ̍ S, 145 ° 12 ̍ E, Victoria (winter 1974; J. Wainer), deposited in QMB ( S26726 View Materials ) .
ETYMOLOGY: The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
DIAGNOSIS: Males resemble those of T. bondi but have subequal prongs on the retrolateral tibial apophysis (fig. 170) and a prolaterally much less protuberant tegulum (fig. 169); females also resemble those of T. bondi but have the epigynal ducts more widely separated (fig. 172).
MALE: Total length 2.4. Coloration as in T. bondi except white mark on abdominal dorsum above spinnerets much reduced. Leg spination: tibiae III, IV v1p00. Retrolateral tibial apophysis directed dorsally, distally bifid, prongs subequal in size (fig. 170); tegulum not produced prolaterally, embolus situated medially (fig. 169).
FEMALE: Total length 3.3. Coloration and leg spination as in male. Epigynal ducts recurved, widely separated, especially anteriorly, where obliquely oriented (fig. 171, 172).
OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED: None.
DISTRIBUTION: Known only from the type locality in Victoria.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.