Thalassia propinqua Hutton, 1882

Brook, Fred J., Kennedy, Martyn, King, Tania M., Ridden, Johnathon, Shaw, Matthew D. & Spencer, Hamish G., 2020, Catalogue of New Zealand land, freshwater and estuarine molluscan taxa named by Frederick Wollaston Hutton between 1879 and 1904, Zootaxa 4865 (1), pp. 1-73 : 34

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4865.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:039515F7-5688-400B-A5B6-CFF8618C248F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4428496

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AD3987E6-FA13-FFF0-50B6-FC31FC33B9E9

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Thalassia propinqua Hutton, 1882
status

 

Thalassia propinqua Hutton, 1882 View in CoL

Pl. 4, fig. C

Hutton, 1882. New Zealand Journal of Science, 1: 281.

Type material. Lectotype (designated here), CMNZ M168.4, and paralectotypes, CMNZ M168.1–3 (3) and CMNZ M12772 [ex M168] (1) (dry shells). The molluscan collection at CMNZ has a radula and jaw mounted on a glass slide with the label details ‘ Thalassia propinqua, Weka Pass, XVI p. 169’, in Hutton’s handwriting (i.e., CMNZ 2017.17.83), which is probably primary type material (see description of radula by Hutton 1883d: 137).

Label details. M168—‘65. Thalassia propinqua Hutton, Weka Pass , Canterbury’, pillbox label in Hutton’s handwriting.

Type locality. ‘Weka Pass (C. Chilton)’ ( Hutton 1882p: 281, 1883d: 137).

Previous illustrations of type material. Pilsbry (1892 [in 1892–1893]: 72, 304, pl. 22, figs. 55–57—‘drawn from the type, ‘H. Suter, del.’), Suter (1915: pl. 9, figs. 1, a—same shell as illustrated by Pilsbry).

Remarks. Hutton submitted a description of Thalassia (?) propinqua to the Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute issue for 1882, but publication was delayed until May 1883 ( Hutton 1883d: 137), and was pre-empted by a brief description in an account of a meeting of the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury ( Hutton 1882p: 281). A description by Hutton (1884b: 169, pl. 10, fig. G, pl. 11, fig. V) of a jaw and radula purported to be from propinqua was based on a specimen from Southland collected by G. M. Thomson (i.e., CMNZ 2017.17.82) that is not type material of, or conspecific with, Thalassia propinqua Hutton, 1882 . From Pilsbry (1892 [in 1892– 1893]: 72) onwards propinqua has generally been assigned to Thalassohelix Pilsbry, 1892 at subgenus or genus level, and it has been interpreted as having a wide distribution in New Zealand, between Auckland in the North Island, and the southern South Island (e.g., Hutton 1884c: 203, Hedley & Suter 1893: 636, Suter 1913: 631, Powell 1979: 318). However, preliminary results of a phylogenetic study indicate that propinqua belongs in genus Therasia Hutton, 1883 ; the genetic data and examination of museum collections indicate that it has a distribution spanning the south-eastern North Island and north-eastern South Island, only (M. Kennedy unpub. data).

Taxonomy. Here treated as Therasia propinqua (Hutton, 1882) n. comb.

Distribution. New Zealand; south-eastern North Island from East Cape to Cape Palliser; Marlborough and Canterbury in the South Island (AIM and NMNZ collection records).

CMNZ

Canterbury Museum

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF