Sulcomesitius duni ( Kurian, 1955 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5019.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:241751BA-E759-49B8-A394-271B2A4650AD |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ED87EE-3B7C-4426-31ED-FD21FE43C3ED |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sulcomesitius duni ( Kurian, 1955 ) |
status |
|
39. Sulcomesitius duni ( Kurian, 1955)
Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 , A–H
Mesitius duni Kurian, 1955 , 4: 83, 85, 86, Figs: 70–75.
Type locality: Dehradun , India (♀ holotype, NFIC-FRI) .
Diagnosis. Female. Length about 5.5 mm. General colour black with apex of metasoma reddish-brown. Head as long as wide; frons coriaceus; ocelli distinct; eye weakly setose; median clypeal lobe conspicuous, anterior margin almost rounded, longer than lateral ones; mandible tetradentate; antenna with sparse pubescence, scape 2.5 × longer than pedicel, pedicel shorter than first flagellomere. Pronotum strongly coriaceous; mesonotum as long as pronotal dorsal area; notauli complete, longer than parapsidal signum; mesoscuto-mesoscutellar suture sulcate. Metapectalpropodeal disc wider than long; metapostnotal median carina present; first abdominal spiracle dorsally placed; posterior propodeal projection spine-shaped. Tarsal claw bifid. Wings nearly hyaline; forewing with pterostigma brown; hind wing with three hamuli. Metasoma polished; second abdominal segment distinctly longer than distal ones. Male. Unknown.
Material examined. Holotype: [ INDIA, Uttarakhand,] Dehra Dun {Dehradun}, Shisham bark, 22-I-1913.
Type conditions. Holotype completely dissected on slide Nº. 122/B. On slides : S1 C1—one complete antenna; forewing; one proleg in three fragments—femur, tibia and basal four tarsal segments; mesoleg without coxa and pretarsal segment; metaleg in three fragments—coxa, femur and tibia and tarsi. S1 C2—fragment of palpi; mandible; distal part of hind wing. S2 C1—head and with attached anterior part of mesosoma; posterior part of mesosoma; metasoma.
Remarks. The holotype is a female and not a male as labeled. Móczar (1970, p. 424) also observed this mistake.
Hosts. Unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sulcomesitius duni ( Kurian, 1955 )
Singh, Sudhir, Colombo, Wesley D., Shreevihar, Santhosh, Pandey, Vijay P. & Tribull, Carly M. 2021 |
Mesitius duni
Kurian 1955 |