Smeringopus saruanle, Huber, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3461.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0704C43A-73D8-4A28-915A-7FF8611C8606 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6418716 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FBB532-FFAD-1729-FF6A-0D983AC4FE58 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Smeringopus saruanle |
status |
sp. nov. |
Smeringopus saruanle View in CoL new species
Figs. 175–176, 182 View FIGURES 169–183 , 190–191 View FIGURES 184–193 , 200–201 View FIGURES 194–203 , 231–237 View FIGURES 231–237
Type. Male holotype from Somalia, Sar Uanle [~ 0°29’S, 42°25’E], 30.x.1971 “S.B.S. (P.L.)”, in MZF GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The name is a noun in apposition, derived from the type locality.
Diagnosis. Easily distinguished from similar congeners (other species of the arambourgi species group) by procursus (short thick shaft, details of tip; Figs. 231–233 View FIGURES 231–237 ), shapes of bulbal processes ( Figs. 234, 235 View FIGURES 231–237 ), and epigynum shape ( Fig. 200 View FIGURES 194–203 ; similar S. arambourgi and S. oromia ).
Male (holotype). Total body length 3.6, carapace width 1.2. Leg 1: 25.5 (6.9 + 0.5 + 6.4 + 10.3 + 1.4), tibia 2: 4.5, tibia 3: 3.5, tibia 4: 5.3; tibia 1 L/d: 56. Habitus as in Fig. 175 View FIGURES 169–183 . Carapace ochre-yellow, without dark pattern, clypeus with distinct pair of dark marks, sternum light brown with large light marks, legs monochromous ochreyellow, abdomen ochre-gray, dorsally only above spinnerets some dark marks, ventrally with pair of black lines in front of spinnerets. Distance PME-PME 135 µm, diameter PME 125 µm, distance PME-ALE 45 µm, distance AME-AME 45 µm, diameter AME 105 µm. Ocular area slightly elevated, secondary eyes with barely visible ‘pseudo-lenses’; small thoracic pit. Chelicerae as in Fig. 236 View FIGURES 231–237 , with pair of small distal apophyses. Palps as in Figs. 190 and 191 View FIGURES 184–193 , coxa without retrolateral apophysis, trochanter barely modified, femur with retrolateral furrow, proximal rim slightly more distinct, cymbium without projection near tarsal organ, procursus short and thick, with distinctive tip ( Figs. 231–233 View FIGURES 231–237 ), bulb with sclerotized embolus and slender partly sclerotized dorsal process ( Figs. 234, 235 View FIGURES 231–237 ). Legs with two rows of spine-like ventral hairs distally on femora 1, few vertical hairs, with curved hairs ventrally on tibiae and metatarsi 1–2, retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 3%; prolateral trichobothrium present on tibia 1.
Variation. Tibia 1 in 3 other males: 6.1, 6.3, 8.1.
Female. In general similar to male; tibia 1 in 2 females: 5.0, 7.6. Epigynum a simple flat plate without pockets, lateral whitish areas separated from median part by black marks, posterior part with indistinct darker areas ( Fig. 200 View FIGURES 194–203 ); internal genitalia as in Figs. 201 View FIGURES 194–203 and 237 View FIGURES 231–237 .
Distribution. Only known from type locality in southern Somalia ( Fig. 204 View FIGURE 204 ).
Material examined. SOMALIA: Sar Uanle: 1♂ holotype above; same locality, 2.vi.1973, 1♂ in MZF ; 18.vi.1973, 1♂ in MZF ; 19.x.1971, 1♀ in MZF .
Dubious locality (or mislabeled specimens): “Le Para (Mth)”, E. Simon collection 2587, 1♂ 1♀ in MNHN ( AR 10352 About MNHN ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |