Sinothomisus dawai Wang, Lu & Zhang, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1217.127555 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B7E1DDC6-9834-42EA-A80E-77ABAADF14F1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14025557 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/36CEFA28-BE47-4CBD-8D15-BD72D8EAC7D9 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:36CEFA28-BE47-4CBD-8D15-BD72D8EAC7D9 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Sinothomisus dawai Wang, Lu & Zhang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sinothomisus dawai Wang, Lu & Zhang sp. nov.
Figs 2 B, C View Figure 2 , 3 G, H View Figure 3 , 8 View Figure 8 , 11 View Figure 11
Type material.
Holotype • ♂ ( SWUC -T-THO-04-01 ), China, Xizang, Medog County, Mirage Observation Deck , 29°20'36"N, 95°20'43"E, elev. 1297 m, 8 July 2023, Z. S. Zhang, L. Y. Wang, Q. L. Lu and X. L. Chen leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: • 1 ♂ ( SWUC -T-THO-04-02 ), same data as for holotype GoogleMaps ; • 1 ♀ ( SWUC -T-THO-04-03 ), Beibeng Township, Damu , 29°14'51"N, 95°11'1"E, elev. 924 m, 28 June 2018, L. Y. Wang, Y. N. Mu and Z. S. Wu leg. GoogleMaps
Etymology.
The specific name is a patronym in honor of Mr. Dawa from the Tibet Plateau Institute of Biology in Lhasa, Xizang.
Diagnosis.
The new species resembles S. beibeng Wang, Lu & Zhang , sp. nov. (Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ) in having same shaped bulb and same position of embolus origin, but differs from the latter by the long and large retrolateral tibial apophysis (vs short and C-like in S. beibeng ), the small spine between the retrolateral tibial apophysis and the dorsal tibial apophysis (vs absent in S. beibeng ), the fingernail-like protuberance at epigynal plate (vs absent in S. beibeng ) (Fig. 8 View Figure 8 ).
Description.
Male holotype ( SWUC -T-THO-04-01 , Figs 2 B View Figure 2 , 3 G View Figure 3 ) total length 4.21. Prosoma 2.19 long, 2.04 wide; Opisthosoma 2.34 long, 1.92 wide. Carapace border black, with a large deep brown spot in the middle. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.18, PME 0.01, PLE 0.16; AME – AME 0.24, AME – ALE 0.21, PME – PME 0.24, PME – PLE 0.45, ALE – PLE 0.21. MOA 0.24 long, anterior width 0.37, posterior width 0.29. Clypeus height 0.18. Chelicerae brown. Labium and endites brown, longer than wide. Sternum brown and scutellate, with brown hairs. Leg measurements: I 8.40 (2.54, 3.04, 1.58, 1.24); II 8.52 (2.62, 3.07, 1.63, 1.20); III 5.42 (1.81, 1.98, 0.91, 0.72); IV 5.34 (1.70, 1.99, 0.95, 0.70). Leg formula: 2134. Opisthosoma oval, yellow, with black spot. Spinnerets brown.
Palp (Fig. 8 A, B View Figure 8 ). Tibia as long as wide. Ventral tibial apophysis small, thumb shaped, closing to retrolateral tibial apophysis. Retrolateral tibial apophysis middle part bulging, with a hook end. Dorsal tibial apophysis small, cone-shaped. A spine-like tubercle between retrolateral tibial apophysis and dorsal tibial apophysis. Bulb flat, apical tegular apophysis nail-shaped. Embolus filiform, originating at approximately 6 - o’clock position, curved along with bulb, tip staying in cymbial furrow.
Female paratype ( SWUC -T-THO-04-03 , Fig. 3 H View Figure 3 ) total length 5.59. Prosoma 2.28 long, 2.25 wide; opisthosoma 3.10 long, 2.61 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.18, PME 0.02, PLE 0.15; AME – AME 0.28, AME – ALE 0.25, PME – PME 0.25, PME – PLE 0.54, ALE – PLE 0.25. MOA 0.26 long, anterior width 0.46, posterior width 0.33. Clypeus height 0.22. Leg measurements: I 7.00 (2.19, 2.56, 1.30, 0.95); II 7.35 (2.30, 2.79, 1.28, 0.98); III 5.05 (1.65, 1.90, 0.76, 0.74); IV 4.84 (1.44, 1.86, 0.84, 0.70). Leg formula: 2134.
Epigyne (Fig. 8 C, D View Figure 8 ). Epigynal plate wider than long, with a fingernail-like protuberance at middle part. Copulatory openings slit like, far away from each other. Copulatory ducts S-like. Spermathecae C-shaped. Fertilization ducts crescent.
Variation.
Males (n = 2) total length 4.21–5.17.
Distribution.
China (Xizang, Medog) (Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |