Salvatoria rhopalophora ( Ehlers, 1897 ) Soto & Martín, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4353.3.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:452992DC-3E00-4E57-9484-608D4463B8BB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6003699 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE67F120-3B79-FFD3-FF32-F984FC13FEC2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Salvatoria rhopalophora ( Ehlers, 1897 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Salvatoria rhopalophora ( Ehlers, 1897) View in CoL n. comb.
Figures 8 View FIGURE 8 , 9 View FIGURE9 , 10 View FIGURE 10
Grubea rhopalophora Ehlers, 1897: 53 , pl. 3, figs. 66–70. Wesenberg-Lund 1962: 65. Brania rhopalophora Hartman 1964: 79 View in CoL , pl. 25, fig. 1.
Material examined. Station 41 (60), station 55 (3) (LBUV) and station 36 (13 specimens plus 2 specimens for SEM) (MNCN 16.01/17770).
Description. Body small, largest specimen a mature male with natatory chaetae, 2.8 mm long, 0.1 mm wide, for about 31 chaetigers. Prostomium ovate, wider than long, with four thick eyes in trapezoidal arrangement and two anterior eyespots. Antennae spindle-shaped ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 , 9A–C View FIGURE9 ), subdistally inflated, ending in short tip; shorter than combined lengths of prostomium and palps; median antenna longer than lateral antennae, inserted on line between posterior eyes ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ); lateral antennae inserted in front of eyes ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Palps similar in length to prostomium or shorter, fused dorsally by a membrane, with small distal notch ( Figs. 8A View FIGURE 8 , 9A–C View FIGURE9 ). Peristomium shorter than subsequent segments; tentacular cirri similar to antennae but more elongate, dorsal pair similar in length to lateral antennae, ventral pair shorter. Dorsal cirri spindle-shaped, present on all chaetigers, all similar in length or with slight variations in length, except those of chaetiger 1, slightly longer than subsequent ones ( Figs. 8A View FIGURE 8 , 9A–C View FIGURE9 ). Compound chaetae with bidentate blades, both teeth similar, provided with moderately long, distally directed, thin spines basally, shorter and straight as more distal on margin ( Figs. 8C View FIGURE 8 , 9D–F View FIGURE9 ); spines longer in dorsalmost chaetae. Anterior parapodia each with about 9–11 compound chaetae; posteriorly number of compound chaetae declines progressively to 5–6 on posterior parapodia, provided with shorter blades, less marked dorsoventral gradation in length of blades. In mid-body, blades of most dorsal compound chaetae 36 mm above, 17 mm below. Dorsal simple chaetae from mid-body, unidentate or minutely bidentate ( Figs. 8B View FIGURE 8 , 9A, B View FIGURE9 ), with minute subdistal marginal spines. Ventral simple chaetae on most posterior parapodia of some specimens, sigmoid, bidentate, similar to dorsal ones ( Figs. 8E View FIGURE 8 , 10C View FIGURE 10 ). Anterior parapodia each with two aciculae, one straight and another one acuminte; solitary acicula in mid-body and posterior parapodia, acuminate ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ). Pharynx through about 3–4 segments; pharyngeal tooth small, rhomboidal to ovate, located near anterior margin, but distinct posteriorly, without papillae on opening ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Proventricle similar in length to pharynx, through about three segments, with 18–20 muscle cell rows. Pygidium small, with two anal cirri, similar to dorsal cirri but slightly longer.
Remarks. Salvatoria rhopalophora n. comb. Is similar to S. clavata ( Claparède, 1863) , a common species in NE Atlantic and Mediterranean, which is widely reported and shows great variability and S. koorineclavata San Martín, 2005 from Australia and China. These species have similar compound chaetae with bidentate blades and short spines on the margin. A revision of this group worldwide, using molecular methodology or a detailed comparative morphological study, would be necessary to segregate and delimitate species. However, S. rhopalophora n. comb. seems to have shorter and thicker antennae than the other two species, and with a shorter pharynx and proventricle. Salvatoria clavata also has the pharyngeal tooth farther back than S. koorineclavata and S. rhopalophora .
Distribution. Sub-Antarctic Islands. New to Chile. Chilean Patagonia: from Concepción channel to Magellan Strait (50°16 ʹ S–54°57 ʹ S).
Habitat. Sediments and algae. Intertidal to shallow subtidal (30 m depth). Inside tubes of Chaetopterus cf. variopedatus in fjords and channels from Patagonia. Salinity: from 30.2 to 35 PSU, temperature: from 8.7 to 8.9°C. From Macrocystis pyrifera kelp holdfast Salinity: 16 temperature: 5.7°C.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Salvatoria rhopalophora ( Ehlers, 1897 )
Soto, Eulogio H. & Martín, Guillermo San 2017 |
Grubea rhopalophora
Wesenberg-Lund 1962: 65 |
Ehlers 1897: 53 |