Rubus auritus A. Beek & P.P. Ferrer, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.677.3.8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87F2-FFAA-A16C-E88F-FF6A74B4FD2D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rubus auritus A. Beek & P.P. Ferrer |
status |
nom. nov. |
4. Rubus auritus A. Beek & P.P. Ferrer , nom. nov., pro Rubus inermis Willdenow (1809: 548)
Lectotype ( Monasterio-Huelin & Weber (1996: 316), pro “ holotype ”; designated by Van de Beek & Widrlechner 2021):—[UNKNOWN], s.d. (B barcode B-W 09891-01 0).
Epitype (designated here):— NETHERLANDS, Veenendaal , Petenbos 6, 52.00908N / 5.54351E, 13 July 2023, A. Van de Beek 2023.04 ( B barcode [in process]; isoepitypes: L barcode [in process] and MAF barcode [in process]) (see Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) GoogleMaps .
The whole plant unarmed. Primocane ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ) roundish to obtuse angular, diameter 5–10 mm, in the sun dark brown red, with dense very short stellate hairs. Stipules linear 9–15 mm long, high (5–10 mm) inserted on the petiole. Petiole 4–7 cm long, with dense short stellate hairs. Leaves ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ) 3-foliolate with lobate lateral leaflets, on strong stems partially 4–5-foliolate, serrature irregular, rather fine, sharp with long mucrons, irregularly rounded periodical, adaxially glabrous or with a few (0–4 pro cm 2) hairs, abaxially grey or greyish green, hardly to rather dense tomentose and with long simple hairs, soft on touch. Central leaflet ovate, elliptical, rhomboid or obovate, with a wedged or rounded base, gradually to rather abruptly short pointed to almost acute; width-length index 0.66–0.88. Length of the petiolule 16–26% of the length of the leaflet. Petiolule of the lateral leaflets 2–4 mm. Flowering branch angular, with dense very short stellate hairs. Leaves 3-foliolate, adaxially with long appressed hairs on the veins and outside these 0–25 hairs per cm 2 on the surfaces, abaxially green or grey tomentose, and with long hairs; serrature rather fine and regular, sharp. Peduncles slightly erect, densely short tomentose ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Pedicels thick, 6–13 mm long. Sepals reflexed, grey tomentose. Petals ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ) pink to pinkish red, ovate or elliptical, sometimes slightly obovate length 11–15 mm, width 5–9 mm, width-length index 0.45–0.66. Stamens longer than the yellow styles. Anthers glabrous. Ovaries with long hairs. Receptacle densely long hairy.
Rubus auritus , on the one hand, shows features that indicate a relation with R. ulmifolius View in CoL , especially the shape of the inflorescence and the many short stellate hairs. However, on the other hand, it has such different characteristics that it certainly does not belong to that species. With its long procumbent primocanes, its leaves that are often 3-nate with deep lobate lateral leaflets with sharp serrature, its short petiolulated central leaflets with wedged or rounded base, it reminds of taxa of the North-American dewberries, the series Procumbentes Rydberg (1913: 430) . Seringe conceived the plant of R. inermis sensu Willdenow View in CoL in the Botanical Garden in Berlin already as a variety of R. flagellaris Willdenow (1809: 549) View in CoL : R. flagellaris var. inermis (Willd.) Seringe (1825: 559) View in CoL . Both R. inermis View in CoL and R. flagellaris View in CoL grew in the Botanical Garden and were published by Willdenow from material that he collected there. Rubus auritus might be a stabilized hybrid of R. flagellaris View in CoL , or one of other Procumbentes , with R. ulmifolius View in CoL . This might also explain the North American origin that Willdenow (1809) claims. Molecular research may give more clarity about the precise taxonomic position of R. auritus .
Willdenow (1809: 548) published once again a R. inermis View in CoL , based on a plant that grew in the botanical garden in Berlin. It is, as the name indicates, just like Pourret’s plant unarmed, but it has also substantial differences: it has often 3-foliate leaves, which are abaxially greenish grey or grey (not white), with a sharper serrature with long mucrons; short petiolulated central leaflets base; especially with young plants the lower leaflets are very small, like ears ( van de Beek & Widrlechner 2021). Nevertheless it was identified as R. ulmifolius View in CoL and consequently conceived as a later synonym of R. inermis Pourr. View in CoL ( Monasterio-Huelin & Weber 1996).
Willdenow’s type specimen is very poor, so that it was difficult to establish its identity ( van de Beek & Widrlechner 2021). Fortunately, recently, a young blackberry plant that corresponded precisely with Willdenow’s specimen was found in Veenendaal (NL) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; for the type of Willdenow see: https://ww2.bgbm.org/Herbarium/specimen. cfm?Barcode=BW09891010). It grew under a high tree where birds used to rest, so that it may be supposed that is emerged from seeds in bird droppings. It was grown to adulthood in the garden so that the identity of a mature plant could be investigated. Plants bred from seeds kept the characteristics, also the lack of prickles. It appeared to be a taxon that is cultivated and sometimes escapes.
In contrast to the St. Francis blackberry, R. inermis sensu Willdenow remains unarmed in the next generation, so that it can be concluded that this feature belongs to the genome of the plant. Another important observation is that the plants are tetraploid ( Ferrer-Gallego & Van de Beek 2021), in contrast to the diploid R. ulmifolius . All together the distinctive characteristics of both taxa are so clear that it is better to provide R. inermis sensu Willdenow with a new name. We chose the epithet ‘ auritus ’, because of the very small lateral leaflets of especially young plants, such as Willdenow’s specimen, which are like ‘ears’ on the petiole. Because the young plant that Willdenow collected is not very instructive, an epitype is designated here. This is taken from the plant that was grown from the young plant that was found in Veenendaal.
A |
Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum |
B |
Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitaet |
L |
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University branch |
MAF |
Universidad Complutense |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rubus auritus A. Beek & P.P. Ferrer
Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo & Beek, Abraham Van De 2024 |
Procumbentes
Rydberg 1913: 430 |
Procumbentes
Rydberg 1913 |
R. flagellaris var. inermis (Willd.)
Seringe 1825: 559 |
R. ulmifolius
Schott 1818 |
R. ulmifolius
Schott 1818 |
R. ulmifolius
Schott 1818 |
R. inermis
sensu Willdenow 1809 |
R. flagellaris
Willdenow 1809: 549 |
R. inermis
sensu Willdenow 1809 |
R. flagellaris
Willdenow 1809 |
R. flagellaris
Willdenow 1809 |
R. inermis
sensu Willdenow 1809 |
R. inermis Pourr.
Pourret 1788 |