Rhyncocheilus griseosericans ( Fairmaire, 1894 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EE775F60-7A04-4DBF-AE0E-C1C4F4F7F030 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4616181 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F90987FD-FFAA-7F00-FF7B-FD4AF8EADEC1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhyncocheilus griseosericans ( Fairmaire, 1894 ) |
status |
|
Rhyncocheilus griseosericans ( Fairmaire, 1894) View in CoL
( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 7–12 , 22–24 View FIGURES 22–29 , 42–49)
Emus griseosericans Fairmaire, 1894: 217 View in CoL .
Rhyncocheilus griseosericans: Coiffait, 1974: 383 View in CoL ; Schillhammer; 2012: 199.
Material examined. China: Sichuan: 1³ 6♀♀, Tianquan County, Erlangshan , alt. 2000 m, 15–21.VIII.2011, Huang Hao leg. ( SHNU) ; 3³³ 2♀♀, Emei Mt., Jiulinggang , 29°34′N, 103°21′E, alt. 1900–2000 m, 1–9.VIII.2012, Huang Hao leg. ( SHNU, NMW) GoogleMaps ; 2³³ 4♀♀, Emeishan Mt., Jiulinggang , 29°34′N, 103°21′E, alt. 1900 m, 25.VII.2012, Peng, Dai & Yin leg. ( SHNU) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Emeishan Mt., Huayanding , 29°33′N, 103°21′E, alt. 1900 m, 22.VII.2012, Peng, Dai & Yin leg. ( SHNU) GoogleMaps .
Measurements. Male: BL: 15.7–21.4 mm, FL: 11.0– 12.1 mm. HL: 2.89–3.17 mm, HW: 2.89–3.06 mm, EYL: 1.00– 1.22 mm, TL: 1.22–1.45 mm, PL: 2.78–2.89 mm, PW: 2.78–2.95 mm, EL: 4.56–5.34 mm, EW: 4.78–5.45 mm. HW/HL: 0.95–1.04, TL/EYL: 1.09–1.44, PL/PW: 0.94–1.00, EL/EW: 0.84–1.01.
Female: BL: 19.0– 26.1 mm, FL: 12.3–14.7 mm. HL: 3.39–3.89 mm, HW: 3.22–3.56 mm, EYL: 1.00– 1.22 mm, TL: 1.72–2.00 mm, PL: 3.11–3.61 mm, PW: 3.22–3.67 mm, EL: 5.56–6.17 mm, EW: 5.17–6.39 mm. HW/HL: 0.87–0.97, TL/EYL: 1.52–1.83, PL/PW: 0.95–1.02, EL/EW: 0.93–1.09.
Distribution. China (Sichuan).
Diagnosis. The species was described from a single female from Ya’an, and the detailed locality is unknown. The locality, Erlangshan of Tianquan County, is very close to Ya’an, and the specimens from there do not differ from the holotype in appearance. Therefore, we regard the specimens listed here as true Rhyncocheilus griseosericans ( Fairmaire, 1894) . The specimens from Emeishan of Sichuan are identical to those from Erlangshan of Tianquan County externally, though the apical portion ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 46–53 ) of aedeagal median lobe is somewhat different, which may be considered to be within the variability range of the species. Schillhammer (2012) redescribed R. griseosericans based on the holotype and specimens from Hailuogou of Sichuan, however, those specimens from Hailuogou belong to a new species which is described herein as Rhyncocheilus gonggashanus sp. nov. For differences between those two species see the comparative description below. Rhyncocheilus griseosericans ( Fairmaire, 1894) is also very similar in appearance to R. sommersgutteri Schillhammer, 2004 described from Liziping of Sichuan, except for the darker body color and the shorter silvery pubescent patches on the elytra.
NMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhyncocheilus griseosericans ( Fairmaire, 1894 )
Tang, Liang, Schillhammer, Harald & Zhao, Xin 2021 |
Rhyncocheilus griseosericans:
Coiffait, H. 1974: 383 |
Emus griseosericans
Fairmaire, L. 1894: 217 |