Pseudoloxops hibiscus, Yasunaga & Duwal, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5356502 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B42B453D-AD9D-4C0E-8E45-1B197AA0BAE3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B3E544AA-A567-4CDF-BF4E-66B8DD5EF845 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:B3E544AA-A567-4CDF-BF4E-66B8DD5EF845 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Pseudoloxops hibiscus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pseudoloxops hibiscus , new species
( Figs. 4I View Fig , 7A, B View Fig , 9A, B View Fig , 10A–D View Fig )
Material examined. Holotype male, THAILAND: Rayong, Ban Phe coast, N12°35′ E 101°25′, 0 m, on Hibiscus tiliaceus L., 27–29 December 2013, T. Yasunaga, B. Shishido ( DOAT) ( AMNH _ PBI 00380543 About AMNH ) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: THAILAND: same data as for holotype, 1 female ( TYCN) (00380544) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Recognised by the generally pale green (whitish brown in dried specimen, cf. Fig. 9A, B View Fig ), subparallel-sided body ( Fig. 7A, B View Fig ); fuscous-red anterior portion of head and apex of cuneus; uniformly pale brown antennal segments II–IV; reddish lateral margins of pronotal calli; sanguineous veins of forewing membrane; apically notched pygophoral process ( Fig. 10A View Fig ); flat, minutely serrate hypophysis of right paramere ( Fig. 10C View Fig ); squared sensory lobe of left paramere ( Fig. 10D View Fig ); broadened phallotheca; and two slender, long spiculi of endosoma ( Fig. 10B View Fig ).
Description. Body largely pale green, subparallel-sided; female larger than male; dorsal surface not spotted, with uniformly distributed, silky, semierect setae. Head fuscous red anteriorly, weakly pointed in front; eyes comparatively enlarged. Antennal segment I rouge, in male with two fuscous (inner and lateral) stripes; segments II–IV pale brown, except for extreme base of II rouge. Labium shiny pale brown, reaching apex of mesocoxa; apex of segment IV reddish brown. Pronotum pale green (pale yellowish brown in dried specimen), with reddish margin at lateral sides of calli; mesoscutum tinged with brown. Hemelytron shiny, smooth, without dark spots; apex of cuneus fuscous red; basal inner part of male cuneus with a rouge, short, oblique stripe; membrane pale smoky brown, darkened along sanguineous veins. Coxae and legs whitish brown; apical part of each femur faintly tinged with orange; proportion of meta-tarsomeres I–III as 4: 6: 7. Abdomen wholly pale brown (pale green in live or fresh specimen). Male genitalia ( Fig. 10A–D View Fig ): Pygophore with sharp apical margin and distally serrate pygophoral process ( Fig. 10A View Fig ); right paramere thickened, with triangular, spinulate subapical part of sensory lobe and flat, narrow, minutely serrate hypophysis ( Fig. 10C View Fig ); left paramere with squared sensory lobe and medially bent, rather broad hypophysis (10D); phallotheca broadened; endosoma with two elongate, slender spiculi ( Fig. 10B View Fig ). Female genitalia not dissected.
Measurements. Male/female: Total body length 3.00/3.50; width of head across eyes 0.71/0.72; width of vertex 0.30/0.33; lengths of antennal segments I–IV 0.41, 1.40, 0.60, 0.54/0.45, 1.35, 0.62, 0.56; total length of labium 0.90/0.99; basal width of pronotum 0.89/1.05; maximum width across hemelytra 1.08/1.50; and lengths of metafemur, tibia and tarsus 1.20, 1.71, 0.30/1.35, 1.92, 0.33.
Etymology. Named for its plant association with Hibiscus tiliaceus L.; used as a noun in apposition.
Biology. Unknown; the two available specimens were collected by sweep-netting Hibiscus tiliaceus L. ( Malvaceae ) at a sandy shore ( Fig. 4I View Fig ).
Remarks. Based on the similar colouration and morphology (generally pale green colouration, faintly orange apical part of each femur, produced subapical sensory lobe of right paramere, broadened, apically rounded phallotheca and two endosomal spiculi), P. hibiscus is most closely related to P. ayutthaya ; But the latter can be distinguished from this new species by the left paramere more slender curved at middle, one of two endosomal spiculi thickened apically, and lacking any red pattern on the dorsum ( Yasunaga & Yamada, 2009). Host preferences of these two species also differ from each other ( Malvaceae and Fabaceae ). In addition, P. pericarti resembles both P. ayutthaya and P. hibiscus , but the former is easily separable from the latter two by having the brownish hemelytron with uniformly scattered, brown, small spots ( Fig. 8D, E View Fig ). Sharing similar morphological characters in the male genitalia, P. ayutthaya , P. hibiscus and P. pericarti are presumed to constitute a monophyletic group.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |