Protuberosa protuberosa (Wehner, 1988)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/1045 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3A934459-9088-4AAB-8CAA-53787046FA17 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF7AFE1F-1117-1C1B-FF09-D98F5A30FFD3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Protuberosa protuberosa (Wehner, 1988) |
status |
|
Protuberosa protuberosa (Wehner, 1988) View in CoL
Figure 15 View FIGURE 15
1988 Prosopon protuberosum Wehner , p. 20, fig. 7, pl. 1.3-1.4.
2000 Prosopon protuberosum Wehner ; Müller et al., fig. 17B.
2009d Protuberosa protuberosa Wehner ; Schweitzer and Feldmann, p. 77, fig. 2.9.
Diagnosis. Carapace widening posteriorly, longer than wide (l/w ratio ~1.2). Very bulbous appearance anterior to branchiocardiac groove, in particular mesobranchial, epibranchial, base mesogastric,
protogastric, and hepatic regions. Ridge with two tubercles on flank. Tubercles scattered across carapace, often with pit in center.
Material studied. Holotype: SNSB-BSPG 2016 XXI 482 ; paratype: SNSB-BSPG 2016 XXI 484 .
Occurrence. Coralgal “Kelheimer Schuttkalk” of Saal an der Donau near Kelheim, southern Germany (Google Earth coordinates: 48.88, 11.94), Late Jurassic (late Kimmeridgian), see Wehner (1988).
Dimensions. ( In mm) Holotype SNSB-BSPG 2016 XXI 482 : max. length excl. rostrum but incl. epigastric swellings (L)=~8.3, max. width (W)=~6.7; paratype SNSB-BSPG 2016 XXI 484 : L=-, W=6.0.
Description. Referral is made to Wehner (1988, p. 20-21) and the English translation in Schweitzer and Feldmann (2009d, p. 77).
Remarks. These two type specimens were housed in the private Sylla collection, but were recently purchased by the Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Munich, Germany. Now the specimens have become available for research, a restudy is warranted. We refigure the specimens including the lateral side of the paratype for the first time, showing a peculiar ridge with tubercles ( Figure 15D View FIGURE 15 ) that was only drawn previously (Wehner, 1988, figure 7B).
Recently, Guinot (2019) suggested removing Protuberosa from Prosopidae and hypothesized relatedness to Bucculentidae. Given the strong similarity of Protuberosa to prosopids, Guinot (2019) implied substantial convergent evolution of the carapace of Protuberosa towards prosopids if Protuberosa indeed would be a bucculentid. However, Bucculentum is widest at the hepatic region, has a spiny to three-pronged rostrum, and does not possess a concavity on the lateral side anterior of the cervical groove as seen in other prosopids (e.g., Starzyk et al., 2011; Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2009d; Schweitzer et al., 2018). As Protuberosa does not appear to differ much from other prosopids (see also Figures View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 11-14), we maintain Protuberosa within Prosopidae.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.