Pontogeneus priscus Leidy, 1852

Martínez-Cáceres, Manuel, Lambert, Olivier & Muizon, Christian de, 2017, The anatomy and phylogenetic affinities of Cynthiacetus peruvianus, a large Dorudon-like basilosaurid (Cetacea, Mammalia) from the late Eocene of Peru, Geodiversitas 39 (1), pp. 7-163 : 13

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2017n1a1

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:40D6C996-226D-49BF-8BF2-E07050BE9035

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4535947

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA8455-8005-FFBE-89DF-FA2914ABFB1F

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Pontogeneus priscus Leidy, 1852
status

 

Pontogeneus priscus Leidy, 1852

HOLOTYPE. — ANSP 13668 About ANSP , isolated middle cervical centrum.

TYPE LOCALITY AND HORIZON. — The original description indicates that the holotype is “from the Eocene formation of Ouachita, Louisiana ” ( Leidy 1852: 52). Recently, Uhen (2005) pointed out the possibility that it comes from the vicinity of the Caldwell Parish, Louisiana, where the upper Eocene Jackson Group (Eargle 1959) is exposed.

DISCUSSION

Leidy (1852) created the taxon Pontogeneus priscus based on an isolated cervical vertebra ( Fig. 4 View FIG ), figured by Kellogg (1936) and interpreted as a fifth cervical. Uhen (2005) recognized it as a more anterior cervical (C3 or C4) and considered both genus and species as nomina nuda because the original description was not diagnostic and the vertebra could belong to a small specimen of Basilosaurus (indeed, the centrum is quite similar in size to that of UM-WH74, a small Basilosaurus isis ). However, it can be evaluated that the vertebarterial foramina in the holotype of P. priscus are proportionally larger than in Basilosaurus ( Fig. 4 View FIG ). Such a feature is diagnostic for the genus Cynthiacetus (Martínez-Cáceres & Muizon 2011) . Because of this character Pontogeneus priscus could have closer affinities with Cynthiacetus than with Basilosaurus (as proposed by Gingerich 2015). However, such a holotype (the centrum of an isolated cervical vertebra) is not regarded as diagnostic enough to characterize a basilosaurid taxon and it is suggested here that the binome Pontogeneus priscus should only refer to the cervical vertebra described by Leidy (1852). Therefore, the genus name and the species name should be regarded as a Basilosauridae or a Pelagiceti incertae sedis and restricted to the type specimen of P. priscus .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Cetacea

Family

Basilosauridae

Genus

Pontogeneus

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF