Plagiotylus, SCOTT, 1874
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00770.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10544406 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E8878D-FFA5-FFA9-5D94-F9D4B48CF9BB |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Plagiotylus |
status |
|
PLAGIOTYLUS SCOTT View in CoL ( FIGS 4 View Figure 4 , 50–51 View Figure 50 View Figure 51 )
Plagiotylus Scott, 1874: 272 View in CoL (gen. nov. type species: Plagiotylus maculatus Scott, 1874 View in CoL by monotypy); Atkinson, 1890: 125 (cat.); Reuter, 1891: 98, 160 (descr., key); Hueber, 1906: 5 (key); Kirkaldy, 1906: 131 (cat.); Oshanin, 1910: 783 (cat.); Reuter, 1910: 148 (cat.); Stichel, 1933: 235 (key); Carvalho, 1952: 74 (cat.); Carvalho, 1955: 67 (key); Carvalho, 1958: 30 (cat.); Wagner & Weber, 1964: 285 (descr., key); Wagner, 1973: 100 (descr., key); Schuh, 1995: 69 (world cat.).
Diagnosis: This genus is distinguished from all other Halticini by the following combination of characters: glossy surface; uniform pale green and yellow coloration; MTG obsolete; females with coleopteroid hemelytra.
Redescription: Coloration ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ): mostly pale green, with yellow, brown, or black markings. Head, pronotum, and scutellum sometimes with blackish markings, antennae often with some brown or black apically, hemelytra sometimes reddened, legs generally pale. Surface and vestiture ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 50A–F View Figure 50 ): body shining and impunctate. Body clothed in long, dark simple setae ( Plagiotylus dispar with both dark and pale setae); antennae and legs spinose, spines longest on AI and tibiae. Structure: male elongate and macropterous, female oval, coleopteroid. Head ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 50A–C View Figure 50 ): transverse, slightly broader than anterior margin of pronotum; approximately as tall as broad, genae height greater than eye height; posterior margin of vertex straight, weakly dorsally rounded; vertex with shallow, narrow, transverse depression, posterior margin weakly upturned and carinate; frons broadly medially rounded, sulcate at clypeus. Labium ( Fig. 50A, C View Figure 50 ): LI short and thick; generally reaching meso- or metacoxae. Antennae ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 50A–C View Figure 50 ): adjacent to lower margin of eye; always shorter than body, shortest in female; AI slightly swollen, almost twice length of eye height. Thorax ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 50A–D View Figure 50 ): pronotum trapezoidal and sloping in males, shorter, subrectangular and flat in females, collar present in males, thin and flat; callosite region weakly defined, lateral margins sloping, posterior margin straight to weakly medially concave; mesoscutum visible in both sexes; metathoracic spiracle elongate-oval, without evaporative bodies; MTG obsolete. Hemelytra ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 50A View Figure 50 ): macropterous male – elongate, lateral margins subparallel to apex of cuneus; clavus apically expanding; embolium narrow, R + M vein running nearly to cuneus; cuneus elongate and narrow; membrane with two cells. Coleopteroid female – clavus and R + M vein faint, cuneus and membrane absent. Legs ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 50E View Figure 50 ): slightly longer in males; metafemora somewhat swollen in females; pretarsi without fleshy pulvilli. Abdomen ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 50A View Figure 50 ): male: elongate, parallel-sided to pygophore. Female: broadly elongate-oval. Male genitalia ( Figs 50A, F View Figure 50 , 51A–D View Figure 51 ): pygophore conical, genital opening large; phallotheca broad, apically tapered, with small lateral flanges, apicodorsally sulcate and weakly sclerotized; left paramere shorter than right, L-shaped, with broad sensory lobe and narrow apical apophysis, apex typically weakly hooked; right paramere much longer than left, apical club weakly laterally deflected, narrow, weakly concave, tapered at apex; ductus seminis short, thick, with flexible ribbing; secondary gonopore elongate and scoop-shaped with prised operculum, opens ventrally, apically dorsoventrally compressed, with distinct scale-like texture; endosoma simple, without spicules, in P. maculatus (and possibly others) with weakly sclerotized fields of spines. Female genitalia ( Fig. 51E, F View Figure 51 ): sclerotized rings ovate, transverse, subcontiguous, weakly sclerotized, most strongly sclerotized laterally, less so towards midline, lateral margins and adjacent portion of DLP strongly upturned; lateral upturned margins of DLP strongly sclerotized; lateral-most region of VLP joins with rami to form paired, medially projecting, sclerotized processes; posterior wall mostly membranous, with weakly sclerotized, transverse, M-shaped process; opening to vestibulum symmetrical, lateral margins weakly swollen and weakly sclerotized.
Diversity and distribution: Plagiotylus includes six species, all restricted to the Mediterranean region.
Included species: Plagiotylus bolivari ( Reuter, 1880) Spain
Plagiotylus dispar Reuter, 1899 View in CoL * Syria; Israel
Plagiotylus maculatus Scott, 1874 View in CoL * Spain
Plagiotylus ruffoi Tamanini, 1960 View in CoL Italy
Plagiotylus sahlbergi Reuter, 1901 View in CoL Algeria; Greece; Libya; Tunisia
Plagiotylus zorzii Tamanini, 1955 View in CoL Italy
Biology and host plant associations: The limited biology and host information available for Plagiotylus comes primarily from Wagner (1973). Plagiotylus maculatus is said to prefer dry, sunny areas and is found on Teucrium chamaedry s ( Lamiaceae ). This species has a single generation per year, overwinters as eggs, with adults present in June and July. Plagiotylus ruffoi has been collected at high altitude (1200–1890 m) in Sicily, on Astragalus siculus nebrodensis (Fabaceae) , with adults are present in July. Tamanini (1960) also reports this species on an unidentified species of Prangos (Apiaceae) ( Table 1).
Remarks: This redescription is based on examination of P. dispar and P. maculatus , as well as the literature. Wagner (1973) provided descriptions, illustrations, and a key to all species; however only the parameres and aedeagus of Plagiotylus sahlbergi are illustrated.
The relative placement of Plagiotylus differs between our equal weights and implied weights analyses, and its true relationship within the Halticini remains uncertain.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Plagiotylus
Tatarnic, Nikolai J. & Cassis, Gerasimos 2012 |
Plagiotylus
Wagner E 1973: 100 |
Wagner E & Weber HH 1964: 285 |
Carvalho JCM 1958: 30 |
Carvalho JCM 1955: 67 |
Stichel W 1933: 235 |
Oshanin B 1910: 783 |
Reuter OM 1910: 148 |
Hueber T 1906: 5 |
Kirkaldy GW 1906: 131 |
Reuter OM 1891: 98 |
Atkinson ET 1890: 125 |
Scott J 1874: 272 |