Leptothrips fasciculatus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4294.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00F6974B-2074-4BA4-99A6-B80937D16865 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6040336 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2620F071-FFA5-AC1A-FF0A-FC9BFEAD4770 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Leptothrips fasciculatus |
status |
|
Leptothrips fasciculatus View in CoL (Crawford DL)
Phyllothrips fasciculata Crawford DL, 1909: 105.
Phyllothrips fasciculata var. stenoceps Crawford View in CoL DL, 1909: 108. Anthothrips nigricornis Jones, 1912: 17 View in CoL .
Haplothrips jonesi Karny, 1912: 344 View in CoL . Replacement name for nigricornis Jones View in CoL , a homonym of nigricornis Bagnall, 1910 View in CoL . Leptothrips russelli Morgan, 1913: 39 View in CoL .
Described from both sexes on Eriogonum fasciculatum [ Polygonaceae ] at Claremont, California, this species is known to breed in the flowers of this plant with no evidence that it is predatory ( Wiesenborn 2012). Specimens have also been studied from Nevada and Arizona. Despite sharing with purpuratus View in CoL the presence of a fore tarsal tooth and the absence of duplicated wing cilia, the pronotum of fasciculatus View in CoL has no prominent sculpture lines but has well-developed mid-lateral setae ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ). Moreover, the sculpture lines on the mesonotum are not closely spaced, but form an almost reticulate pattern ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25 – 30 ). The fore tarsal tooth of males is considerably larger than that of females.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Leptothrips fasciculatus
Mound, Laurence & O’Donnell, Cheryle 2017 |
Phyllothrips fasciculata var. stenoceps
Jones 1912: 17 |
Haplothrips jonesi
Morgan 1913: 39 |
Karny 1912: 344 |